It could turn out that our experience of free will is an illusion, just as it could turn out that our experience of the exter-nal world is an illusion—we could be living in a computer simulation like the
nuts
It could turn out that our experience of free will is an illusion, just as it could turn out that our experience of the exter-nal world is an illusion—we could be living in a computer simulation like the
nuts
o act freely, libertarians believe, your desires must be your own. In other words, you must be self-programming
i feel saying someone is self programmed is extreme
do not believe in free will. Schopenhauer’s words: “Man can do what he wants, but he cannot want what he wants”
disagree
fine what’s moral as whatever your God mandates andsuddenly most people become immora
weve talked about this alot.
Instead of showing that free will is an illusion,neuroscience and psychology can actually help us understand howit works
i agree i feel scientists are very one sided.
oraland legal responsibility may be closebehind.
that aint good
Also, it is often suggested that individuals are free tochoose and modify their environment and that, in this respect, theycontrol their destiny
i believe this
mind—body problem,
??
r. Yet a basic tenet ofthe judicial system and the way that we govern society is that wehold individuals accountable (we consider them at fault) on theassumption that people can make choices that do not simply reflecta summation of their genetic and environmental history
i agree with the judicial system.
surely it follows that individuals cannotlogically be held responsible for their behavio
i disagree
ead trauma to the tendency of violent video games tomake children behave aggressively
makes sense
rachnoid cysts were associated withviolence
can u try and get rid of these cysts surgically?
whether it’s an unhappychildhood or an arachnoid cyst or both.
horrible comparison
The implications of the claim were considerable. American law holds peoplecriminally responsible unless they act under duress (with a gun pointed atthe head, for example)
i mean that makes sense
an abnormal cys
not a mental defect
neuroscience began to transform the American legal system
??
But what of thedistinction between testimonial and material evidence?
true
including consid-50erable risk of false-negative and false-positive results.
trustworthy???
EG andfMRI techniques need not raise special privacy concernsthat make them any more objectionable than accepted tech-niques such as polygraphs or tissue sampl
makes it ethical
electroencephalogra-phy
what does this mean??
henyou'retellingthetruth,thisareaisasleep.Butwhenyou'retryingtodeceive,thesignalsareloudandclea
pretty cool
ceptionscans,asifmymindhadtoworkhardertogeneratethefictitiousnarrative.Crucially,theareasofmybrainassociatedwithemotion,conflict,andcognitivecontrol–theamygdala,rostralcingulate,caudate,andthalamus–were"hot"whenIwaslyingbut"cold"whenIwastellingthetru
interesting
hatapolygraphactuallymeasuresisthestressoftellingalie,asreflectedinacceleratedheartrate,rapidbreathing,risingbloodpressure,andincreasedsweating.Sociopathswhodon'tfeelguiltandpeoplewholearntoinhibittheirreactionstostresscanslipthroughapolygrapher'snet
would love to try and beat a lie detector test
cientistsareusingthetechnologytoanalyzethecognitivedifferencesbetweentruthandlies
this is very cool
MRIismakingitpossibleforneurologiststodetectearlysignsofAlzheimer'sdiseaseandotherdisorders,evaluatedrugtreatments,andpinpointtissuehousingcriticalabilitieslikespeechbeforeventuringintoapatient'sbrainwithascalpe
this is very beneficial for society
ould planting ‘beneficial’ false memories be the next big thing for tacklingobesity, or myriad other health complaints from fear of the dentist to depressio
even if there are positive results i think its unethical
lse suggestion ate about 25% less peach yoghurt than the others. The avoidance of peach yoghurt was most pronounced among those people who now said they could ‘remember’ the fictional sickly inciden
interesting
memory researchers have known for decades that our recollections of the past are often inaccurate, and that sometimes we remember entire events that never happened at all.
this sometimes happens to me with dreams thinking that they are real memories
brainwashed you without your consent
i feel this is so un ethical in many ways
uppose, for example, that some well-intentioned person could have deliberately planted a vivid false memory of this fictional event in your consciousness, believing that the memory would change you in ways that would benefit your life
seems so messed up
Would it be ethical to implant false memories in therapy?We can implant false memories with increasing ease –and it may well help you to live a healthier, happier life. But what are the ethics?TTake a moment to remember an event that you experienced as a child. Pick something that’s important to you –an event that really shaped for the better the person you are today.
the event happened but as time goes on you forget the exact details
U0126 deletes fearful memories,
seems crazy
ecause of these effects, propranolol is regarded as a memory erasing drug.
its like alcohol
Because of these effects, propranolol is regarded as a memory erasing drug
kinda like alcohol
Because of these effects, propranolol is regarded as a memory erasing dru
kinda like alcohol
If seeking happiness is a common dream of all human beings, and if living with painful memories causes unhappiness, then erasing painful memories seems to be an obvious human desire.
i disagree, losing a family member is painful but you would never want to forget about that
ethical questions.
yes it does
ltimate human desire.
not me
s there a risk that you would forgivehim too easily?
think that this is a situation where u shouldnt forgive
even about keyautobiographical facts – are actually incorrect or evenfalse
crazy statment
he soldier might also holderroneous beliefs about his courage or cruelty, traits thatmight be relevant in a crisis situation.
true
self-deception wouldbe to change our knowledge of who we are: a soldier whoforgot what he did during a war (or even that he participatedin the war) might face unpleasant surprises upon learningevidence of his past
this is a good argument cause PTSD is a terrible thing and veterans go through alot but being in the military is also a huge part of people
uch research raises hope for treatingconditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder(PTSD), in which painful memories become intrusiveand damage an individual’s ability to live an ordinarylife.
i think this is a great way to use memory erasing
hen theymade the mice produce an excess of this protein,memories of painful events were completelyeliminated.
crazy how you can figure this out
CT is now being used to alter and destroy memories.
seems messed up
electroshock therapy
whats that?
physical pain couldbring her to orgasm
what.....
Freud discovered had more to do with psychologicaltrauma than physical illness
interesting
“morality pill”
dont think this is possible
Undoubtedly, situational factors can make a huge difference, andperhaps moral beliefs do as well, but if humans are just different intheir predispositions to act morally, we also need to know moreabout these differences
i agree with this
seminary students on their way to give a lectureabout the parable of the Good Samaritan would, if told that theywere running late, walk past a stranger lying moaning beside thepath.
should help the person
Why are some people prepared to risk their lives to help a strangerwhen others won’t even stop to dial an emergency number?
because some people arent good people
ast October, in Foshan, China, a 2-year-old girl was run over by avan. The driver did not stop. Over the next seven minutes, morethan a dozen people walked or bicycled past the injured child. Asecond truck ran over her
that is just crazy and horrible.
ocial skills
i dont think you can enhance social skills
The power to modify brains and the resulting mentalstates and behavior obviously has enormous ethical, legal,and policy implications
seems sketchty
umerous studies haveindicated that a wide array of cognitive and behavioralphenomena can be affected by such interventions, frommemory to mood to morality
this is interesting
free coffee in the break room to the more
free coffee would be amazing in the workplace
Sure, you’ve got the talent for this, but we require you to take Adderall.
never would happen
were more likely to use the drugs as study aids and bring along those habits as they moved up the ladder
agree
dozen of their colleagues had admitted to regular use of prescription drugs like Adderall, a stimulant, and Provigil, which promoteswakefulness, to improve their academic performance.
very obvious this has occured
ra of doping may be looming in academia
defentialy see that happening
At present we don't know enough about the connections between intelligence and personality to know how serious a risk that is but I think it's a risk worth considering
there are always going to be risks in different experiments
Last week I spoke with Buchanan at length about the ethics of deep brain stimulation, the history of cognitive enhancement, and what a world of cognitively enhanced human beings might look lik
i would be interested to see that
DCS has now reached a critical stage where its risks must be carefully considered before the research goes further
seems risky
Using technology to enhance our brains sounds terrifying, but using tools to make ourselves smarter may be part of humans' nature
just doesnt seem right
.1.3. Ethics
i think this is one of the biggest topics in this whole discussion
hirdly, we briefly review the ethical issues associated withcurrent neuroscience technologies.
ALot of ethical issues with these technologies
In fact, until forty days after conception, the fertilized egg is considered as “mere fluid.” These facts form the basis for the Jewish legal view on abortion
I am jewish and i disagree with this
Coma, PVS and anencephaly
i disagree, my cousin was in a coma for months and now is fine so i do think there are different degrees
ccording to philosopher Mary Anne Warren (1973), "the traits which are most central to the concept of personhood . . . are, very roughly, the following: 1. consciousness . . . and in particular the capacity to feel pain; 2. reasoning (the developedcapacity to solve new and relatively complex problems); 3. self-motivated activity (activity which is relatively independent of either genetic or direct external control); 4. the capacity to communicate, by whatever means, messages of an indefinite variety of types . . . ; 5. the presence of self-concepts, and self-awareness. . . .
we are all human regardless of these five traits
To be classified as a "person" normally entails having strong moral rights and legal protections, and higher moral status than living things that cannot credibly be classified as persons.
I disagree, we are all people but our morals make or break if we are a good human being or not
t’s difficult to imagine our selves as disconnected from the particular bodies we have
I can never see my self in a different body. I never could put my mind to think of it
We take for granted the intimate connection between our minds and bodies.
I agree, our mind and bodies do have such a connection
This has led the experts to conclude that althoughnon-human, dolphins and whales are "people" in aphilosophical sense, which has far-reachingimplicatio
They might be very smart mammals but i do not think in a philosophical sense they are humans either
It is based on years of research that has showndolphins and whales have large, complex brains anda human-like level of self-awareness
they might have large complex brains but they are not human.
Experts in philosophy, conservation and animal behaviour want support for a Declaration ofRights for Cetaceans.They believe dolphins and whales are sufficiently intelligent to justify the same ethicalconsiderations as humans.
I think this is a ridiculous statement
fense.Is it wrong to kill som eoneto puthim out of his m
it is wrong
Th ou shaltnot ki
agree unless its war
. Good peopleus uallyperformrightactions,bu t it doesn’talwaysturn out th at
this is true but its the moral thought i guess that counts
We usuallyjustifyour acti ons by appealing to var ious mo ral pr in ciples,such as: it’s wrongto steal,it’s wrongto li e, it ’s wrong to br eak pr omises, andthe lik
these are all morally wrong
t wa s an act o
disagree.. if my sisters told me to kill them i would never do it. thats not an act of love
id Lest er Zygmanikdo the rightthing?
no that is murder...
On the other hand, surgery and general anesthesia carry some smalldegree of risk to an otherwise healthy patient, and we are under anobligation "not to harm" the patient.
this is known going into surgery that there might be risks you have to take and if the patients agrees then there isnt harm being committed
Our medical goal should be toprovide the greatest benefit to the patient,
I feel like that is known when doctors give their oath
pluralistic
what does this mean??
Deductive
what does that mean
Therefore,every rave n that ever wil
cant really argue with facts
Everybody does it, so I sho uld be allow ed t
opinion
ere may be sever a
Shouldnt there be only 1 conclusion?
be anyth ing but logical . In phil osophy ,the term “argument”is rese rved for those claims in which ther e is suppo sedlya logical relationbetwe en the premisesand the co nclus
I feel in arguments there are not alot of logical arguments
Whatmakesapersongoodorbad?
i think this is very interesting topic to discuss because everyone can have many different opinions.
Canweacquireknowledgeoftheexternalworld?
very interested in this topic.
Whatisaperson?
this makes me really think
right
I think no opinion is right unless its factual.
o we have a soul that will survive the death of our bodies, or will we cease to exist when our bodies die?
I find this very interesting because this thought has come to my mind plenty of times and I am really curious to what happens.