without first considering if Korean women are prepared to take on new freedoms
I'm conflicted: should I interpret this as a sign of introjected societal norms that makes the author fear changes that might be too drastic? Or is it a very wise way of approaching a thorny issue because he doesn't want "women's liberation" to fail?
if only men are engaged in scholarship, knowledge in certain fields might be developed, but the development of a more comprehensive knowledge for humankind will be hampered. Even knowledge specific to men will tend to lag behind.
this is a very powerful argument! She's basically telling men that they are limiting humankind by not allowing women to participate in scholarship.
She's also leveraging scholars' narcissism by telling them that their own knowledge is limited and they could achieve much more by engaging with women scholars. I'm curious to know what was the reception of this essay. I guess it made some men furious...
select some text
this is an example of annotation.
If you wish, you can add images, videos, or links.
To add tags, type in the bow below and press Enter.
Mario Barenghi
prova
This is where y
prova
The events of that period twenty years ago
this is an example of annotation
this is an example of annotation. Scanned PDFs are not so good because you cannot highlight passages.
Notes on the Texts
