Why, then, beat such a hasty retreat to the state of knowledge as it existed in 1978, and miss out on all this new information?
I have found that there is something about older information that makes it feel more trustworthy or just a "better" source than a more recent one. I found myself, when working on the mysteries paper, subconsciously choosing older studies. I find this to be incredibly interesting as, like Wengrow states, this deprives us of new, hopefully less biased, information.