Add a figure with a caption. This could be a figure from your previous work or a picture of you in Hawaii.
Do you want to specify that the license should be permissive enough to allow this re-use?
10 Matching Annotations
- Jan 2019
-
git.dhimmel.com git.dhimmel.com
-
- Apr 2018
-
www.bioverlay.org www.bioverlay.org
-
Both reviews are available in full below.
Demonstrating that hypothes.is allows comments to be world visible here.
-
- Aug 2016
-
-
The CS would perform document conversion to ease viewing and searching for material, thereby accelerating new discoveries.
It's hard for me to understand why a central service is going to be more innovative in this area. This also seems to be something that would be more within the purview of a journal.
-
The CS/Governance Body will work with universities and funders to apply uniform standards of author identity, checks for plagiarism, moderation of problems, and create ethical guidelines for research and disclosure
- Author identity seems easy & makes sense.
- Plagiarism checks seem like they might better be the purview of a journal. If someone wants to use their preprint for something, that seems like the time for a check to come in.
- Moderation of problems is a bit confusing. I'm not sure what it refers to and would have trouble commenting.
- Does this mean something above and beyond the standard for publication, or does this mean applying the standard for publication in this domain?
-
Scientists want their preprint to “count” for hiring, promotions, and grant applications.
Scientists want their research to count. The only way I can really see a preprint counting is if people read it. I think that having a public document that we can point to in our promotion & tenure docs/etc is more important than some idea that it's an 'official' preprint.
-
rchiving content through a CS better assures permanence of the scientific record, even if a preprint server/publisher decides to discontinue their services.
What are the current standards for preservation and how does this proposal differ? I am under the impression that to get the ability to mint DOIs there must be some sort of plan in place. Does this go above and beyond that?
-
The CS would become the location for scientists to search for all new pre-peer reviewed content.
Is this thing a gateway or a gatekeeper? This makes it sound more like a gatekeeper a la a regular journal. Would the journals be as accepting of preprint servers if this happened? This seems to step on their business model much more than the current standard.
-
services (such as archiving, automated screening, and document conversion)
Are they going to provide services or the software underlying those services? If they promote high-quality open source software, then it seems like the physical infrastructure is less important than the software.
-
Clarity on what qualifies as a respected preprint
Why should we respect a preprint? I'm not sure that we should respect anonymously peer reviewed journal articles as much as we do. It's important to remain critical, and I worry that trying to put a veneer of 'respectability' over preprints is not as helpful as expecting people to read them to judge content.
-
- Feb 2016
-
asapbio.org asapbio.org
-
Some feedback was already provided when this was first posted: http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=1820
-