already doing already
already doing already
already doing already
already doing already
something
an example?
multisig
worth explaining what a multisig is?
No system will be neutral, but designers can set out to make it as pliable as possible, avoiding the temptation to simply replicate the architecture of the computer or the culture of its builders in the design of social spaces.
Well said
Its hiccups often seem to remind students why they prefer systems that powerful companies manage for the price of their data.
hahaha
gvoernance
typo
rolls
rolls?
his
whose?
play
Still unclear what play exactly is.
beginning infiltrate
beginning to?
exactly what investors want to avoid paying for in their pursuit of scalability and market dominance
Could we make a case for customisation even for investors? For instance, today D&I is a top priority owing to the research that points to business profits resulting from diversity in thoughts and company culture.
“Is This Model Right for You Checklist” from the Creative Interventions Toolkit
What is this exactly for?
Online spaces need abolitionist imaginations
I really enjoyed this entire section. Could we draw parallels between the many offline transformations discussed here and what they would be like in the online space? It is probably covered in the next section, in which case please ignore.
For democracy to thrive its institutions must be vulnerable to continual reinvention. Its traditions must be alive enough to permit that
I love this take of viewing democracy as a continuously evolving institution. Im excited to read what's next.
racialized minorities as “the miner’s canary”—people whose experiences represent early warnings for social problems poised to affect everyone else
Nice
In 1995
I felt like the previous and next chapter had nice introductions that set stage better. It explains the context without ruining the intrigue. With this chapter, I had to read quite a bit to understand what this chapter is trying to address. Terms like 'no-politics' and 'superhighway' did not give me too much of a context before reading the chapter.
China’s achievements in human development are historically unprecedented. Under our system my generation has thrived, and is far more positive and forward-looking compared to our peers worldwide. There may be a “perfect” model of democracy that you have in mind, but democracy as practised throughout most of history is best described as corrosive and sclerotic. One need only contrast the state of American and Chinese infrastructure to arrive at this conclusion.
Could you discuss this a bit more? It's mentioned as a statement from your student, and discussed a little from a neutral standpoint. This section felt like a case against democracies/ Could you express your thoughts on this and talk about why you believe the world needs democratic reforms?
Rather than flame wars, technologies might thereby encourage the art of consensus-making, as brown teaches in Emergent Strategy. They might enable movements to persist and evolve, rather than disappearing into the next viral moment.
Love this line of thought.
Until we have some sense of how to live our solutions locally, we won’t be successful at implementing a just governance system regionally, nationally, or globally
Love this
other kinds of lessons, seeking other forms of salvation
What exactly is other here?
its history and progeny alike
Wasn't able to understand this
but adopters have decoded meanings very much their own, which become new encodings in turn
Nice
“These tools are often blunt and senseless”
Nice section
Albert O. Hirschman predicted that while exit-based organizational logic excels in producing variety, choice, and innovation, voice-based logic confers greater commitment and stability. A study of the GameCenter online community, for instance, observed that when the platform’s “benevolent dictator” became less active over time, subgroups developed unexpected resilience.104
This is nice. Felt like this section was missing a "why not feudalism" up until this point because of how successful the other organisations/websites are.
derives
derived?
Conway’s Law
Nice.
The company shrugged, called the vote “advisory,” and proceeded with the rule change as it saw fit.
Haha wow. Didn't know this happened. Interesting story.
Progenitors: BBS, Usenet, and e-mail lists
Is it worth mentioning Ethereum here? It's the newest amongst others, with philosophies that want to break the autocracy. But in reality, Vitalik has been a BDFL. One that the community is happy with, though.
elevating messages to the top of a group’s feed
could talk about pinned posts?
“rape in cyberspace,” a prolonged case of sexual assault
would it be worth explaining what exactly happened here?
exit
exist?
digital economy
what exactly are we talking about here?
Corporations found benefits in encouraging centralized control among user communities
Nice "Ahhh I see" moment here
habit more than of malice
Agreed. Nice way to explain the gravity of the matter without attacking the creators.
effective from affective voice
Nice one.
had only a single board member
Had some trouble understanding the timeline here. I was under a misconception that BLM was founded only around the time of George Floyd's passing. I just learnt that it's been active since 2013.
Would like to better understand the chronology of 1. BLM founding 2. movement's expansion 3. Geroge Floyd's passing and BLM's rise 4. donations 5. statements demanding transparency 6. Cullors stepping down
Democracy as a design practice
I liked this section and title. Democracy as a design is a novel way to look at it.
.
Loved the entire introduction and it talks a lot about why governable spaces are important. It's a convincing introduction.
I have not read media study books so I was wondering if an introduction with so many citations are common. Felt like this was a mix of an introduction and prologue combined into one.
I found parts with examples and stories (like the garden one or the park one) to be more of an "introduction". Even the "why" for the book would fall into the introduction because it motivates the reader to keep reading. But probably the inspirations and citations could be part of an acknowledgements or prologue section? Just a thought.
I hope to provoke a more widespread recognition that the design of everyday self-governance in online spaces matters
I like this.
sensual
cerebral/psychological?
Democratic erosion
This section clears some of the ambiguity in the previous section. Answers the "why" for the book.
What happens online is terrible and wonderful; I love my favorite online haunts. If I criticize our networks as they are, it is because I see glimpses of what they could become. Our networks are spaces we have still only begun to co-create and self-govern, and thus to inhabit fully.
Nice.
For instance, communities seeking to challenge anti-democratic power should cultivate democratic practices, including through intentional choices about their social technologies.
Could we have some example to understand this better?