On each line, immediately to the right of the line number, appears a statementF of 𝔏, which was entered on that line in accordance with a single rule2. To the right of F appears the justification for F’s having been entered on thatline, consisting of a notation indicating the rule in accordance with which Fwas entered and the antecedent line(s), if any, to which the rule was applied3. To the left of the line number appears the set of premises of F (the statement(s)in the numbered sequence on which F depends), where each premise is citedby the number of the line on which it appears, and where the set of premises ofF is determined by the rule in accordance with which F was entered

The formalization of logical deduction, especially as it has beendeveloped by Frege, Russell, and Hilbert, is rather far removed from the forms of deduction usedin practice in mathematical proofs.”

'white' as a re-sponse to the familiar kind of sensation, provides that term with nosemantic identity. It acquires a semantic identity as, and only as, itcomes to figure in a network of beliefs and a correlative pattern ofinferences. Depending on what that acquired network happens to be,that term could come to mean white or

Also sprach Grann

his is a rather generous reading of our pedagogical transactions,for it assumes that we knew how to excavate these disagreements further. Butthe perceived limits were often real limits at which we did not know how toproceed.

Rather than arguing for the primacy of the virtual over the material, or the material over the virtual, xenofeminism graspspoints of power and powerlessness in both, to unfold this knowledge as effective interventions in our jointly composed reality,

“If substance possesses equally all attributes, there is no hierarchy among the attributes, one is not worth more thananother.

Equalityandsimilarity, andaboveallthesimilarity ofthosewhoaresimilarinbeingvirtuous,isfriendship.Forvirtuouspeopleareenduringly[virtuous]inthemselves,andenduring[friends]toeachother.Theyneither requestnorprovideassis-tancethatrequires baseactions,but,you might evensay,preventthis.Foritispropertogood peopletoavoiderrorthemselvesandnottopermititintheirfriends

S

JiirgenHabermas

polemios, and not ekhthros.

inamicus

hostis,

The specific political dis-tinction (die spezifische politische Unterscheidung) to which po-litical actions and motives can be reduced is the distinctionbetween friend and enemy (dze Unterscherdung von Freund undFeind)”

reversingapostrophe which converts the friend into an enemy and com-plains,

d, first, Ihave not yet said anything in my own name.

Eleatic

ceteris paribus

Malthusian f

Mutatis mutandi

“vicarious traumatization.”

m") is v

The epistemic virtue of being conscientious issurely intermediate between the epistemic vice of carelessness and the epistemic vice of beingfar too careful, such that one’s inquiries become completely stymied

I have two hands cannot be coherently supported byreasons (and hence is inappropriate) and neither can it be rationally doubted.