5 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2023
    1. A woman I’ll call Anna was searching for a job in Texas when she stumbled across a generic listing for online work and applied. It was Remotasks, and after passing an introductory exam, she was brought into a Slack room of 1,500 people who were training a project code-named Dolphin, which she later discovered to be Google DeepMind’s chatbot, Sparrow, one of the many bots competing with ChatGPT. Her job is to talk with it all day. At about $14 an hour, plus bonuses for high productivity, “it definitely beats getting paid $10 an hour at the local Dollar General store,” she said.

      this is definitely something i would do for fun to make some money

    2. They are labeling food so that smart refrigerators don’t get confused by new packaging, checking automated security cameras before sounding alarms, and identifying corn for baffled autonomous tractors.

      this is just to much work for something that should be programmed for there purpose.

    3. These AI jobs are their bizarro twin: work that people want to automate, and often think is already automated, yet still requires a human stand-in. The jobs have a purpose; it’s just that workers often have no idea what it is.

      i feel like if we having AI work for us why do we need a standin to just make sure there doing there job when we can just have us humans just do it, its like a self check out.

    4. “Some people don’t know how to stay in one place for long,” he explained with gracious understatement. Also, he acknowledged, “it is very boring.”

      I can understand that sometimes its hard to stay in something that doesn't benefit you in any way.

    5. It’s difficult and repetitive work. A several-second blip of footage took eight hours to annotate, for which Joe was paid about $10.

      I couldn't imagine having to work 8 hours just to make $10 and not even get your full about of work pay for something that is difficult.