We can tell that JFK views the United Nations as a functional organization that will be effective at regulating and enforcing certain global policies as well as brining awareness to issues such as human rights violations. However, because the United Nations does not have governmental authority it only serves as a way for leaders to claim they will make changes and abide by their rules and regulations, while continuation to violate them once the meeting is over.

Here is another example of JFK injecting slight amounts of communist rhetoric into his views of Americans and the amount of external intervention we should extent on impoverished countries in terms of using government funds gained through taxes, instead of supporting individual contributions to private charities, which have shown to better manage and maximize resources.

From this statement we can conclude that President Kennedy intents to implement and support the creation of highly interventionist foreign policies and fight against those who attempt to unlawfully subjugate their populations or populations of other nearby groups on the basis of governmental intentions.

We can imply from this section that Barry Goldwater opposes not only those who disagree with his position and attempt to label him as a extremist, but he opposes the foreign and domestic policies established by the previous administration, which from the date, I can assume is John F. Kennedy, who was a strong self-proclaimed Democrat.

We can assume that this speech was created as the definitive response to opposition from clearly liberal politicians and individuals who suggest that retaining traditional policies and political positions is incorrect, and that the United States should embrace similar characteristics of Communist Countries.

The seperate but equal laws were flawed because they attempted to establish equality which cannot be established when individuals are forced to use seperate amenities and attend seperate educational institutions most of which were underfunded due as the educational system was focused on providing the best resources to the larger majority which consisted of whites.

Separation on the basis of race is fundamentally discriminatory and prevents any other following legislative action from achieving equality, therefore this doctrine represents an oxymoron because it represents a contradictory situation which existed just to partially appeal to the African Americans who did not understand that this argument is logically flawed.

This use of the word Ghetto is a reference to how the German Government lead by the Nazi Party moved Jewish Individuals as well as groups they hated to areas that were very low quality and offered little amenities and job opportunities as way of appealing to the crowd most of which were still alive and have a vivid memory of the reports that came back from Poland when the United States Invaded Germany.

Here we can see that MLK had no problem using the term Negro to describe African Americans, and considering that he himself was a member of the black community and was not known for having self-deprecating views. However, this term is considered to be highly offensive and is rarely used by the African American Community to describe themselves, even though the other word they use is even more offensive.

Here the author describes how Communism far from being an altruistic ideology that treats all humans equally, is a system that forces those who who have abilities and capacities over others to relinquish their personal rights and freedoms to benefit other, which is the most factual and objective information.

The author goes to great lengths to communicate that Communism is diametrically apposed to the Systems and moral values and government that existed in the United States, by essentially repeating the same fear mongering argument but using different words and sentence structures to do so. He provides very little evidence to suggest that Communism, which he claims is completely opposed to all that the United States stands for, will be able to persuade wand influence people who embrace those opposing ideas.

This statement fails to understand that Hitlers ultimate purpose for invading and conquering most of Europe was world domination, a feat that he wildly overestimated in terms of his ability to successfully defeat the combined forces of the United States and Great Britain. To state that the Soviet Unions is the only one to have a animated ideology that resembles a religion in terms of its blind dedication, is an attempt to over exaggerate Communism's immediate potential to destroy the nation, in order to rally people against a threat that had not yet entered into the United States through invoking fear and anxiety and paranoia.

Based on what we learned about the impact of joining the second world war on Foreign Policy, does it surprise you that the government would go to great lengths to proclaim and exaggerate the supposed threat of Communism and the actions deemed necessary to combat this threat, leading up to the Entrance into the Korean War.

The Senate committee called the HUAC was appointed to investigate the contents of the statements made by McCarthy in order to determine if his claim about the presence of possible communists who were known only to the state department.

He gave a speech in which he did not give any names, in order to generate a sense of paranoia and fear mongering that allowed the act of being called a communist to be a sentence and a charge which could result in societal isolation. He also did not mention the exact number in order to allow the range of those who he labeled as communist to expand past those who are actually communist or have any relationship or acceptance of slight ideologies similar to communism.

This statement begs the question, how does he know for certain that these individuals are actual identifying and claim to be full fledged communism.

Here McCarty claims that the cloaked ideologies that have caused the sorry conglomerate of warped thinkers can only be will only be solved when those individuals are removed from office, and a new system of honesty is reestablished. However, throughout the course of this article he fails to provide any evidence to backup his claims.

Here McCarty claims that he post-traumatic emotions generated after large scale conflicts and the moral desensitization has prevented the people of the United States from understanding or recognizing the entrance of the political ideology of communism from entering into the minds of those who execute substantial influence over the legalization.

This sentence confirms my above hypothesis, which states that McCarty accuses legislators in the government of not just having perspectives and views that might be slightly closer to communism than capitalism or conservatism, but of being members of a thorough infestation of outright definitive communists, a claim that he neglects to substantiate in the following paragraphs.

Here McCarthy implies that those who have been at work rendering the United States powerless and corrupting the strength and power that it had gained and sustained after the Second World War, are members of the higher elites who reside in the offices that have control and influence over the laws and operation of the United States.

Here McCarthy implies that opposition to communism should occur in the form of a purely religious rejection of its atheistic characteristics. However, he neglects to mention that one does not need to be religious or have any religious association or alignment to be opposed to communism, and the arguments which are derived from a non-religious perspective are much stronger and damning as they are based on pure objective reasoning, and do not require one to have any understanding of religion.

Here McCarthy uses an emotional and subjective statement and claim to either represent his feelings and views and impose them on a greater population in order to make it seem to the reader that this sentiment is a widespread perspective shared by a larger majority of the population.

The author also proposes that once the Nazis defeated the British they would not immediately attack the united states using weapons of war but weapons of propaganda, by taking over countries around the united states in an attempt to threaten us into submission and cut off our access to the outside world one trade lane at a time.

The author intends to bring awareness to the fact that just because Germany has not yet attempted to make any actions that would directly harm the United States domestically, the power and force that it represents a greater ideological threat that will be soon to come after Britain has fallen.

The author argues that in a sense we have already joined the war by becoming a supplier of resources which we provide to Great Britain which remains the only formidable power remaining in Europe to resist the forces of Hitler and the Japanese Empire. The English Channel is the lone obstacle that remains in Hitlers plans to eventually execute an attack on the United States, and it remains this way only because of the determination of 45 million Brits, and the supplies that we have provided. To enter the war with physical force would not be as great of a step as the isolationist propose.

This article takes the opposite position presented by the previous article, demanding that the assumption that the tremendous forces of Nazi Germany sweeping across Europe pose no threat to the new world. They oppose the isolated strengthening of the Domestic Forces along, however, if they believe that danger is not present why should they support increasing defenses.

The author argues that by refraining from becoming an element in the conflict currently occurring in Europe we will have the ability to focus our resources upon preparing for an attack which no country in the world would be able to successfully execute against us. He also states that no one can persuade the United States to enter into a war unless we ourselves are willing to do so, however, no one will attempt to fight us if we remain armed as a great nation should be.

From these polls it seems like those who have something to gain from their promotion and support of entering in the Second World War, are not represented by the majority of the United States Populations, 80% of whom did not think that entering the War was a good and feasible idea.

The author argues that continuing to provide the allies with support in Europe is darning the United States of its power while they attempt to remain neutral as possible without actual becoming an element of the conflict. The author does not see any benefit in joining this European conflict until the situation has the possibility to be sucessfull.

The interventionist insist that we should attack Germany without taking into consideration or evaluating our Military Forces and ability to locate a weakness that we can exploit in order to reduce the number of casualties and increase the amount of gained territory. These emotions are understandable, but avoiding making illogical decisions is the most important aspect of this situation.

We can assume based on this information that Germany currently occupies a large portion of Europe, which makes it difficult for the United States to find an effective path of entrance without meeting the full force of the Germany Army, who lead by Hitler has access to seemingly endless supply of artillery, firearms and aircraft. Britain, due to its geographic characteristics as an island prevents Germany from invading via landmass connections, thus making it the most formidable opponent, but not for long.

Based on this information we can conclude that Great Britain requested our assistance very early in the Second World war, especially after Germany began to annex Poland and surrounding countries. We also know that the United States had already begun sending resources to Great Britain to defend themselves against Germany, but we withheld our official entrance based on our desire to retain our isolationist foreign policies in light of the recent unilateral ending of the First world War.

It is of course very illogical to enter into warfare with another country or entity without first determining of a chance of success is beyond reasonable doubt, regardless of the other side was responsible for the first attack. While this type of unprovoked attracted may generate strong negative emotions, it is important to resist the urge to enter into combat justified by the thirst to take revenge, which may result in long term consequences that may worsen the situation.

Not only are these skills important for court room persuasion but they are often used by politicians, lobbyist or activists on a daily basis to manipulate individuals into believing their claims or even supporting and defending their cause.

It is true that Legal practices attempt to isolate themselves from the world of rhetoric which they erroneously believe is detrimental to their ability to persuade and influence. This belief is often times reinforced by stating that legal practice involves only the use of pure logical and reasoning with established objective concepts. However, it is still possible to incorporate the other less rational modes of persuasion while maintaining its objective tendencies, according to the idea that an advocate must be able to logically, to understand how to recognize in which circumstances each of the modes should be used.

This article belies that the most beneficial assumptions falls in the middle ground between assuming complete rationality and assuming ignorance, and care must be taken to ensuring that each audience is analyzed as a unique instance. One must change their use of each of these three modes of persuasion in proportion to the uniqueness of the audience and the context of the case in the courtroom.

The modern persuader wrongly assumes that their audience is widely rational and capable of logical analysis, however this understanding was not an element of Aristotle who operated on the notion that it is better to assume your audience is uneducated and have them demonstrate their intelligence than the inverse.

Why has the classical system of rhetoric died off, and might it be the result of the introduction of the acceptance of witness testimony based entirely on emotional justification and not logically analysis for political and ideological reasons rather then to serve the purposes of those involved or who have been wronged by an individual.

From this title I have concluded that the author of this article is going to discuss the use of rhetoric, specially the type developed by Aristotle and the benefits of applying in the courtroom, when the utmost care must be taken when analyzing the facts, evidence and judgement can determine the future of those involved.

Average intelligence is considerably lower than that which is desired for most of the population to contain, as it prevented Hazel from fully understanding that she had just seen her son and a ballerina murdered for the crime of wanting freedom from the oppression of the government which they is the path to true equality, when in reality it just serves to ensure that the citizens are unable to fight back no matter how strict and unreasonable the rules become.

We now know that even so much as taking your handicaps off or taking them off someone else in order to grant them freedom even if temporarily is a crime which is punishable by death. The handicapper general must be a position that can cause a person to become overwhelmed with power, as they can literal kill people who try to regain their god given rights to not be subjected to such oppression.

Harrison was the only person who had both the strength and the intelligence to overcome all of the handicaps that had been placed on him to the point where he was even able to escape from prison wearing 300 pounds of scrap metal and other weights. I now understand the true reason why these handicaps are required for only citizens who are not government employees. They use devices on the strong and the intelligent to keep them from thinking, and they do nothing about the average, because the average thinking person cannot conceive a plan to overthrow the government that is oppressing its people, under they guise of establishing equality.

As I concluded, the HG men along with all the other totalitarian government officials are not required to wear these handicaps, because they would not be able to design the handicapping devices in the first place if they were forced to wear concentration and focus breaking devices, those are only for the scummy general population the stinky common people who must allow their rights to be violated in every aspect or face the consequences of death

When a person pursued a profession that they enjoyed, they were required to wear weight when doing so. This makes it difficult for me to understand how any buildings were constructed in the first place, when the person required to carry heavy loads, was already so weighted down they had the equal strength of an average person. They even placed ugly masks on people who couldn't help being beautiful having warm luminous voices, by requiring them to intentionally make it sound horrible and almost hard to comprehend. I just realized that the government and all who work for them, are the only ones free from these attached handicaps, which makes me wonder, what makes them privileged and unequal enough from anybody else to receive this status. It would be impossible for the police or military to be efficient if they were handicapped so they are exempt from this equality which is hypocritical to say the least.

Not only did they use mental restrictions such as high frequency noises that were designed to interrupt the thinking processes of those who were more intelligent, they also place physical handicaps weights designed to make them just as strong as the average person, even when their strength is not something they can avoid. The government has also instituted excessive punishments and fines for removing any of the weights that a stronger person is required to carry, two thousand dollars, and 2 years in prison, for not wanting to carry around lead weights for so called equality.

It is clear by this statement made by Hazel that religion has been completely prohibited as it requires a person to believe in a certain set of system and methodologies, which makes a person have attributes that are not equal to others who may believe in another set of theological concepts. Therefore in order to establish this so called equality, the government eliminated religion and made it illegal, when in reality they have made equality their religion, even though they will not admit it.

From the terminology used in this first paragraph, the United States has taken totalitarian actions against its own people to ensure equality by any means necessary not by offering equal opportunity, but hiding, and reducing the abilities and attributes of those who are skilled and highly intelligent, attractive, strong, or otherwise. The only ones immune to this equality are those who work for the government, which makes no sense, as they themselves are in a position that violates the foundations tenants of their goal. It is clear from the fact that their have been 200 amendments that the rights of the individuals no longer matter, as they have been essential written away.

I conclude that this decrease in the overall loneliness of the story is an indication that the woman has lost a bit of her rejection for company especially the company of this man who saved her not because he wanted to know the message the saucer told her, but because he to was ugly and no one wanted to hire him. She has found the solution to her loneliness, the message that was given to her has united two alone individuals by a common experience.

The saucer was as I predicted merely a message container that had the ability to implant the information directly into their mind of the person with whom it interfaced, allowing them to understand it in their own language. It was a highly advanced message in a bottle.

It is clear that since she is the only one who knows the truth of what was said by the flying saucer, that the fact that the message does not contain anything regarding weapons, super races, or threats against the earth, would make it hard for the FBI to believe what she said, as they had no way to determine if what she was saying was true. Her refusal to tell them made her look even more like a spy.

I fail to understand exactly why they are holding a trial against this woman for not telling them exactly what the flying saucer told her. Even if it is a message of great importance given by some extraterrestrial race to mankind, how will we know if we can even understand it.

The FBI is clearly attempting to cover up this occurance and point to something other than aliens or extra terrestrial activity in order to avoid causing mass panic within the population. They are attempting to extract as much information as possible from the woman, and I can understand why they keep asking her the same questions. Not because they do are not exchanging information, but because they want to test and see if her recollection changes over time to determine authenticity.

I am very interested in how the FBI agent happened to arrive so quickly after the incident, and I find it difficult to believe that he just happened to be in the area very close to the woman when it attacked her. Something tells me that the FBI had been tracking this device for a long time, and he was actually tracking it when it attacked.

This saucer could not contain any living creatures, as it is clearly smaller than a car tire, which can be implied by the fact that it was able to attach to her head quite easily and not cause permanent damage to her skull or brain, which would occur if it was any larger.

I consider the possibility that the flying saucer might not be attacking her, which seems strange as there are many other people in the area that it could have attacked, but for some reason it choose her. It also could be applying the only method available to it for communication, as it is clearly an extraterrestrial object that came from a civilization that may have developed highly advanced technology.

I am wondering exactly why the sounds and sights of the city suddenly disappeared and if it is a result of the flying saucer that is mentioned in the paragraph below, or the fact that her attention has been drawn to another object, which prevents her from noticing those background noises,

This girl has clearly gone through a serious traumatic experience that has rendered her perspective of all people to be entirely negative. No one understands her, everyone wants something from her. This explains the severe rejection of all the kindhearted help that the man offered her, and the fact that she desperately attempted to stop him from saving her life.

She is so determined to kill herself that she insults the man who has saved her by asking why he couldn't leave her alone. We are informed that their is a legitimate reason for the suffering that had caused this attempt by stating that she had no longer had the capacity to feel fear.

Why is this girl so determined to kill herself that when someone who is clearly trying to help, she attacks them violently and tells them to go away and to let her die alone.

Why exactly is this person near the edge of the beach where a girl has most likely attempted or is currently attempting to vomit suicide and has removed her clothes to eliminate suspicion if anyone finds her or any remnants of her personal belongings.

Why do you think this girl had decided to kill herself, and in the most painful way possible, which requires you to submerge yourself in the ocean or any suitable depth water until you become unconscious due to a lack of oxygen and then die from asphyxiation. Their are many other less painful and drawn out methods to commit suicide, the easiest being hanging, which does not require any special resources which might cause suspicion, such as using a firearm.

This number represents a very substantial loss even our modern era where over 80 years of inflation have decreased the value of the dollar. This means that around $26 billion dollars during the time of the Great Depression, in the 1930's is equal to around $470 billion dollars, which is an excessively large loss for any time period regardless of inflation. Now consider the fact that Amazon is worth about 107.9 Billion as of November of 2019.

If the author considers it a sin to even begin writing why does she continue to do so, and why does she think that writing what no one else has written is such an unforgivable crime, while she her self continues to comit the very sin she describes. What soceity is the author describing in which using her ability to write and dictate her thoughts and experience illegal to the point where it is considered more than just a crime against men but a crime against God.

This idea refers back to the fact that Satan often times used the Holy Scriptures to lead people into sin, which is one of the central themes in the Bible. The greatest example of this, is when Satan temps Jesus to jump from the top of the temple, because "If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee; and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone." Jesus replies, "It is written again/Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God."

This reference to an insane root, is used to imply that Banquo is questioning whether both of them had been poisoned by some herb or plant that causes a person to hallucinate and see things that do not exist, which seems reasonable after the witches suddenly vanish into thin air.

The witches begin to use their magic and boldly proclaim that Macbeth shall be king over Glamis as well as Cawdor, to which he is surely surprise, and Banque confused. They begin to chant Hail Hail Hail, and Macbeth interested in what the witches have to say begs them to continue.

Here Macbeth has been attracted by the witches magic to the region of the Forres where they have been conducting their magic, and is closely followed by Banquo who is of equal rank and position to the former. They come across the witches and Banquo is quick to ask whether they are even human, for their shriveled and sunken features give them a monsterous inhuman appearance.

Now here is something I find very intriguing, and is another example of Shakespeare's abilities as a playwright and literary expert. The primary sources that Shakespeare used to create Macbeth was the Holinshed Chronicles, where the weird sisters were known as the beautiful goddesses of destiny, but they are give a far more sinister and ugly nature in Macbeth.

It sounds as if the witches are using their demonic magic to collect the items that would be used to produce a potion or spell that most likely has the power to cause severe damage to whom every the spell is cast against.

Here we have direct references to the numbers 7 and 9 which were considered mystical to almost every civilization in history, but 9 is particularly interesting in terms of its relation with evil. The witches who are followers and worshipers of satan would delight using 9 upside down which when repeated 3 times is the number of the beast.

Here the witches are in the process of collaborating to generate a forces that will tear the ship on which the sailor has departed to Allepo Syria, one creating the wind the other making a hole big enough to sink it.

The man name Lennox has not entered the scene, after the sergeant has been attended to. Lennox has traveled to this location from a county that is located on the east coast of Scotland, which was known as the Kingdom of Fife to the natives of Scotland. He then goes on to describe how the norwegian rebel has made a mockery of the people of that area, as well as providing many praises to Macbeth's unsurpassed skills on the battlefield as one of two captains under the King.

Here we are given further information about Macbeth's position in the Kings Army, which provides us with information regarding his military experience and status as a veteran of many battles. Below this section, the sergeant describes how he was unable to understand exactly why the followers of the rebel fought back so hard against the Kings Army.

Here we can see the first time Macbeth enters into the scene, he is already demonstrating the power of his positive attributes and strength, wielding a sword ready to give everything to smite Macdonwald with all his will and might. The term smoked with bloody execution is used to describe the way in which he entered the battle with an expression of bloody murder. He even stated that he was not willing to leave until the rebel had been decapitated and had his head impaled on a stake outside their camp.

Here we are given the name of a person who we can imply is the enemy against which the Sergeant was fighting, when he suffered defeat but avoided capture and enslavement. He is described as being a merciless villain who is worth of being called a rebell, and the fact that all the evil in the world is attracted to him like flies to rotting meat.

It is very interesting that Shakespeare choose to use a word that we known in the modern era as a word that refers to a type of cooking that only uses the heating element above the food, where in this context he is clearly asking the Sergeant about the state of the battle, and when his injuries forced him to leave

I am interested to discover exactly what newest state Duncan is describing in this statement regarding the bleeding Sergeant, who has clearly been engaged in some wartime task. As it turns out this newest state is a reference to a latest condition, maybe of the battle in which he was previous engaged or the status of the enemy or his army.

I am also very interested in the definition of the word Padock, which I am implying is a creature or entity that lives in areas that are filled with air and fog, which may indicate it lives in a swamp. I looked up the definition and the work Padock means toad, as it was believed during this time period that Satan sent witches as evil spirits to help them carry out their deeds. These spirits would disguise themselves as animals according to the following, the first witch would become a cat, called Graymalkin, the second witch would become a toad, which was called a Padock. The third witch was not mentioned in the first act as having a form, but is later becoming a Harpy, which is a very nasty and vicious creature in Greek Mythology.

I am very interested in the contents of this exchange between these three witches, but need to know the definitions of the worlds Hurley Burley, as it will provide more context as to the intentions and purpose for which these witches exist and what they intend to do.

I am also very interested in the definition of the word Padock, which I am implying is a creature or entity that lives in areas that are filled with air and fog, which may indicate it lives in a swamp. I looked up the definition and the work Padock means toad, as it was believed during this time period that Satan sent witches as evil spirits to help them carry out their deeds. These spirits would disguise themselves as animals according to the following, the first witch would become a cat, called Graymalkin, the second witch would become a toad, which was called a Padock. The third witch was not mentioned in the first act as having a form, but is later becoming a Harpy, which is a very nasty and vicious creature in Greek Mythology.

The word hurley-burley means uproar or tumultuous, which makes since in the context of the previous sentence which mentions the thunder, lightning, and rain which are all natural entities that produce violent sounds.

I am very interested in the contents of this exchange between these three witches, but need to know the definitions of the worlds Hurley Burley, as it will provide more context as to the intentions and purpose for which these witches exist and what they intend to do.

Contents Of Treaty Of Versailles: Territory Of Germany Taken Back Colonies Of Germany Are Taken Away Germany had severe military restrictions Germany was required to stay under quotes They didn't follow the requirements Hitler. Germany is going to have to pay reparations. Creation of the League Of Nations

American has a desire to operate on its own, with its citizens making the decisions regarding its complete operation and who they elect to lead them and oversee their protection, without the influence and power of another larger body.

Here the author quotes and brings up the character of former President Lincoln who became the leader of the country during a very tumultuous period of history in the United States. He was a person who refused to pay the price of allowing slavery to continue even though it would have settled a large amount of the conflict between the north and south. This determination and resistance to external government or peace at the price of slavery is exact the type of resistance the author intends to instill in his readers.

The term League is an shorthand form for the intent of the nations who gathered after World War 1 to ensure that a battle of this scale would not repeat itself, called the League of Nations, which would soon dissolve at the beginning of the Second World War, and reemerge as the United Nations. The author sees this League as the formation of a World Government that would have the ability to subject countries to its rules and legislation none of which was voted on by the citizens of those countries.

He labels this Treaty Of Versailles as a foolish agreement that will endanger the underlying democratic principles of the Republic of the United States. He claims that it is in conflict and opposition to the right of the peoples to govern themselves free from any restraint, legal, moral, to the foreign powers and influence of the European countries. He intends to be faithful to the ideals that founded and established the United States of america, against which this Treaty stands.

The author of this document argues that the United States should not be deeply involved with the political and legislative actions of European countries, the high diversity and cultural differences might cause more conflict that it resolves.Also the author mentions how it is impossible to meddle and influence the affairs of the Europeans without the Europeans meddling and influencing the affairs of the United States.

We can see that President Woodrow wilson intended to make it plain that Germany was responsible for a large majority of the death and destruction brought about during the First World War, regardless of the fact that they were not directly responsible for its beginning. And that all of the European countries should come together and form an alliance that would serve to solve problems and conflict peacefully.

President Wilson does not intend for the United States to take military act against Germany in retribution for the attack on the Lusitania, but rather to have a civilized discussion and negotiate to come to a more peaceful resolution that does not cause massive loss of life.

We can assume that the Lusitania might have been either a military or civilian vessel that happened to enter into to German waters, and was subsequently shot down. This strict and violent use of force against any vessel that approaches Germany provides plenty of evidence to suggest they are war hungry.

This information provided by President Wilson, was obtained through an intercepted German communication between Zimmermann and the Mexican Government, which provided enough evidence to suggest that Imperial Germany was building up their armies and running practice drills in anticipation of War in Europe that could involve the United States.

Do you think the interception of this message provided the Americans with the strategic, political advantage they needed to organize the Allied forces against the Germans in the case that War broke out among the European countries, and prevented Mexico from gaining the element of surprise needed to take over the lost territory in Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona

Here we can see the first indications of possible Japanese involvement in the First World War. However, Japan did not appear to the United States to be a threat until their attack on Pearl Harbour made it plain that they intended to follow through with a plan similar to that of Hitler, but using soldiers who were willing to kill themselves to defeat their enemies, also known as kamikaze fighters.

According to this proposal Zimmerman indicates that he has a desire to form an alliance with the Mexican Government, and that Mexico has substantial resources and military power that they could use against the United States quite easily due to the direct contact with Texas and other southern states. How does the stability and integrity of the Mexican government and population during the early 1900's, compare to its current drug infested state of death and destruction and fear on all sides.

What type of code or encryption system did the Germans use prior to and during the First World War, and how did it compare to the later development of the Enigma machine that enabled them to change the encryption methods every single day to ensure that even if the Allies broke their code, they would not be able to use it on the next days transmissions. Why do you think the Germans thought that they had the advantage.

The term daedel is used in this context to describe something that is powerful, sizable and has the ability to exert its forces over others.

A legion of thoughts is more than 60,00 indicating that the author is using this word to state that these wild thoughts are numerous.

I have determined that the Arve is actually the name of a river in france that stretches over 100 miles, and is well known for its length and depth. Here the author uses references the river and mentions its strength and power as a medium to communicate with the reader and better explain.

Here the word power is capitalized to intentionally draw attention to the way in which this word is used to describe the Arve, which is a word I have never heard and will the find the definition of by the end of my annotations to help me understand what entity the author is referring to.

The author uses figurative language to compare the human mind and its vast functions to the way in which the water flows over the rocks in a river, the way the sounds of nature travel through the forest and the way the wind blows across the mountains.

Here the author goes back and reiterates a statement he had made previous a the beginning of the poem, describing how nature has always and will always have a positive impact on his life and how his absence has not affected his view of nature

The author describes how our mind should a safehouse for positive thoughts, about nature and beauty and the good things in life, without fear, pain, or grief, with nothing but the healing thoughts of joy and tenderness.

Here the author describes how we should allow nature to be a motivation to use, allow the moon to strenghthing us, the mounting winds to assist us, and to blow against you fowards toward your destiny.

Here the author describes how the world and the people within it do not appreciate the environments of nature and how their minds are filed with lofty thoughts, evil tongues, and rash judgements, and selfish men.

Here the author uses personification to describe nature by giving it the qualities of a human being, calling it his friend and describing how he understands the language that it speaks, and the former pleasure that he would feel when surrounded by it.

The author explains how his age has not affected his views of nature and his enjoyment of the meadows and woods, and mountains and all that exists upon the green earth.

Here the author compares the sky and the ocean to the way in which the mind operates, a vast expanse of thoughts and feelings that flow sometimes calmly and sometimes violently depending on the day the time and the circumstances.

The author describes how the charm and happiness that used to belong to his youthfulness has been taken by age, and he no longer looks at nature for what it can do for him, but for what he can do to enjoy it the best he can.

We can imply that since the author mentions that he has lost his boyish days, that he is either middle aged or a senior. Because of this he can no longer bound through the woods and leap over the rivers as hs used to be able to.

Here the author describes how he first behaved when he was able to experience the joys of nature, how he would go bounding over the hills like an animal, and walked over the mountains also the place where he became a man.

The author now returns to his current feelings by mentioning how he stands here under the tree of life, and is filled with the thoughts of what provides light and happiness in the world.

Here the author describes how the world without nature primarily in the city seems to be joyless and lacks happiness in the day time as well as the night, and how these feelings are heavy upon the heart of the author.

In a way the peace provided by surrounding yourself in nature can naturally slow our heartbeat which allows us to feel calm and relaxed as if we are sleeping internally and become a living soul.

The author explains here how the pleasure and comfort that nature provides is able to combat and cure the heavy and stressful responsibilities and the weight of the unintelligible world around is and invoke a serene and blessed mood.

This collection of verses is rather difficult for me to understand as it uses a very interesting literary device to compare the restoration provided by nature, to the slight or trivial influence on the best parts of a good man's life, and the his good and nameless unremembered acts of kindness and love.

As it turns out my prediction that the author has been living for these past five years in a city have been confirmed in this stanza, as he directly describes the lonely rooms and loud and distracting noises of the town and city in which he had resided.

Once again the author uses a metaphor in which the experience and lifestyles of a vagrant living in the woods, and a hermit living in a cave are compared to the uncertainty that is noticed

This section leaves me wondering where the author has been for these past 5 years, and what prevented him from experiencing the elements of nature and the calm that it provides. From the other term used in the following lines I have concluded that the author has been in the city or in a place that is seperate and isolated from authentic natural environments.

At this time their were little to no regulations on meat and food processing facilities, which resulted in the spread of many infectious and deadly illnesses from the contaminated food that came into contact with the water from the leaks as well as the rats who carried pathogens that are extremely dangerous. Not only were the rats in contact with the meat, they were killed with poisoned bread, and would then be sweeped into the machine to be processed together. Things entered into the processing machines that made a poisoned rat seem like just a small problem. Meat would be left in barrels and the rust and old water would further contaminate the meat.

The purpose of this metaphor hyperbole is to express the lengths that the assessor would go to find names that he could use to increase the list of voters in support of a particular party, consulting even the deceases persons, lost children's records and going as far as making up names of people who are non-existent just to ensure that enough votes are counted words.

What has happened to corrupt the political systems of Philadelphia to the point where the votes of the citizens no longer determine who will be elected for leadership positions in the city and who is personally responsible for igniting this massive scheme to control the financial resources of the city for their own personal gain.

The fact that boys as young as nine and ten could be legally employed in such dangerous work for so little compensation was the primary purpose for writing this article and doing investigations to determine first hand the extent of the employee abuse and how they were at risk of death everyday, not a situation in which a child should be placed ever.

The dangers that the boys were faced with were the same faced by the older men who had the maturity and development nesssiary to deal with these difficult situations, even though even an adult could not properly operate in these risky and unsafe environment where injury and fatality were common and dismemberment was a regular occurance due to the lack of protection against the forces of nature especially in the cold and oxygen deprived areas of the coal mines where gasses released from the ground could cause asphyxiation. These poor working conditions were not unique to this particular coal mine and processing plant, rather it could be seen and observed in almost all of the factories that produced coal in the united states. The most dangerous and life endangering job was that of the trap boy who would be forced to wait fourteen hours alone in the dark coal mines until dawn.

These boys did not have the ability to receive any schooling and were often times very undereducated and ignorant of the world around them. It was clearly a shock to the author to hear that the boys had not been introduced to the concept of God, which implies that this is a matter that is very important and should be provided to all young children. He was also surprised that they continued to persist in such traumatizing and dangerous environments without such thing as a belief in a great and all-good God.

These boys worked longer hours than anyone should legally be required to work, as the human body especially the young and fragile body of a child cannot be subjected to these kinds of conditions for long until they start to have a detrimental impact on physical, mental and cognitive health that is often times permanent or irreversible. The amount of coal dust in the air which by the way does not dissolve in the lungs and absorbed by the body, rather it collects and can cause black lung and asthma.

During this time period their were no safey precautions or protective measure taken by companies to ensure that their employees were protected against workplace accidents. They were not given any protection against the unforgiving metal machines that ground the coal into chunks, which was the cause of many deep cuts, and lost fingers. Their is also the irreversible psychological trauma that occurs when a young child who has not yet developed witnesses a fellow child being torn into pieces by a machine. Many of the regulatory bodies such as OSHA exist as a result of the progressive actions taken during this time period to provide suitable and safe working conditions as well as make it illegal to employ children for adult jobs.

Progressive reformers were people who supported implementing laws to protect workers, namely child labours from the manipulative and often abusive tendencies of the companies for whom they worked. The reform adjective is used to describe the intent to make significant changes that would be beneficial to the common person, by exposing the public to the wrong doings of the guilty parties, in order to generate enough support and resources to overcome the financially armoured opposition.

I find this description to be very interesting. and would seem a very strange political ideology to us living in the modern era where politics is primarily dominated by the conflict between radical leftists and the conservative party. However, I understand the addition of the conservative in front of the world socialist means that the author does not support heavy government interference in our daily lives, finances and economical systems. However, the increased support for socialism, is only directed towards the radical leftist views on the theory of socialized income, healthcare and economics, in which the government is involved almost 100 percent, a governmental system that has not succeeded at any time in history, regardless of the "lack of proper implementation" argument used to defend it.

While it might have been a priority of progressives to implement laws that would protect children from abuse and misuse in the workplace, they have clearly lost this empathy and care for children altogether which can be seen clearly by the increasingly radical push by modern progressives for abortion on demand, for any reason without restriction.

What characterised the focus of progressives during this times compared to the focus of progressives in this modern age, in the context of the term Social Justice. How has the term Social Justice been turned into nothing more than a euphemism used to blanket and disguise harmful and destructive doctrines with a more altruistic and appealing facade.

In this section the author uses the claim that we must follow in the footsteps of the prophets and martyrs who died to save us from the evils of the past, by expanding the boundaries of the republic, into the lands unexplored and the savage wilderness. This argument is purely derived from a perceived directive that is not contextually sound in terms of the foundational principles of the United States, and reveals itself as more of a desire for other lands over which to tule and dictate, in the same manner the English had conducted themselves towards the US only 150 years earlier.

The author once again uses arguments derived from some sort of divine instruction, the so called world duties that have been given into the hands of the United States, to go forth and disturb areas around the world, that we deem inferior and subjecting them to our standards and morality without their consent or agreement beforehand.

He then processes to justify the acquisition and governing of other external non-connected lands, by using the relative fact that France, England, and Germany all have governed and owned lands, past, present, and future. This is a very weak argument, and can be easily defeated by stating that America was built on a democracy where the people have the power to decide the elected leader, while the countries that still have colonies at this time were still Monarchies, and Dictatorships, and Empires. Justifying the invasion of other lesser countries, by stating that Monarchies have done so is very feeble and fragile. He also previously mentioned that we are supposed to spread our morality into foreign areas, so why would we allow much less justify doing so because of others.

He then proceeded to factually state that a government must have the consent to govern granted to it by the citizens, which is in all contexts accurate. He then goes as far as to claim that the peoples of those countries that he desires America to invade and correct, would prefer our governing.

Here the author makes a direct reference to one of the parables of Jesus, as documented in the New Testiment. In this parable, Jesus describes a rich man, who needed to go away for a while, so he gave his gold into the hands of his most trusted advisors. All but one of them took their gold and invested it and received in return more than they had been given. The last man was cowardly and instead buried it in the ground. When the rich man returned he gave the men who had gone out and multiplied his wealth, much riches, while scorning the man who had not even the discretion to put it in the back so even if he did nothing, it would still increase in value. Another example of a direct appeal to Heaven or a higher authority to justify his position.

Here the author of this document is using an argument from Heaven or essentially, justifying the invasion of countries that he claims are inferior in terms of society, culture and morality, by stating that God has given us a mission to do so, and we are not to question this divine instruction.

The author is even more worried about the prospect of allowing these external territories to be granted the same powers of governing and influence in the Senate, and Congress as any other contiguous state, due to the fact that the connected landmasses directly affect and relate to eachter, while external areas would remain highly isolated and unique.

The author does not want the United States to focus on obtaining any more land, as the contiguous states have already been purchased and acquired from the Countries that had originally colonized them. This practice is no longer necessary and should be avoided, so that the Government can focus on more pressing matters.

The author of this document encourages the United States to abandon this practice that in many ways is similar to the colonization methods used by the Country that they had declared independence from, and the fact that it will create divisions in status between citizens of the contiguous and non-contiguous territories of American.

The author of this document compares the acquisition of Alaska, to the colonization processes used by the British, im which the natives are considered to be lesser in status than a citizen of the mainland government.

The author of this document, created a list of the characteristics of all of the territorial acquisitions made by the United States, except for Alaska, the fact that they were contiguous with the mainland, and were not located in a tundra zone, where the institutions of democracy can operate properly/

The author of this document wants the reader to understand the original purpose of acquiring the other states in territories purchased by the United States, had 5 characteristics as mentioned in the previous paragraph.

The author of this document argues that at the very conception of the United States, a large amount of focus was placed on expanding its territory to the contiguous areas connected to the original 13 colonies, besides the regions of Mexico, and Canada.

This section describes how these Hawaiian people were very responsive and accepting of the Christian Religion, and they became even more dedicated to God, and righteously aligned to his word than some native and Christian born Americans and European.

This section describes how the established tribal governments in Hawaii, regardless of the improvements they put in place, still ruled their people with an oppressive dictatorship that took advantage of the lower class and impoverished, as was characteristic of many unrighteous and self centered European Monarchs.

The purpose of this instruction was to make sure that you do not show your partial broken down food to those around the table, as this was widely considered highly offensive. Looking around during drinking, was also perceived as a sign of deceit or the fact that you were untrustworthy or did not trust those around you .

The purpose of this statement is to make sure that people speak cleary and with boldness and authority, as using the proper and corrrect english language was one of the signs of education, intellect, and ability among other things. They also used language that we would consider highly technical in our modern era, to the point where a normal language conversation was almost a scientific exchange.

The purpose of this instruction is to ensure that a persons unavoidable birth characteristics are not a cause of embrarrasement in front of other expecially if it was gained through another persons attack or violence agianst them, a memory they might be trying to forgett.

This instruction is to make sure that people do not find purpose and value in themselves based on their achievements, but rather the content of their character, their integrity or those other beneficial behaviors and personality and character traits.

The purpose of this instruction is to ensure that you treat the subject or context with the same seriousness as the person who has started the discussion or contributed a piece of information. Also laughing at your own wit, is a sign that you intend for your spoken word to increase your own popularity rather than to show your intelligence.

THe purpose of this instruction is so that you will be able to empathize with the person who is suffering to make them more comfortable, for you are as serious as they are they will feel better due to the fact that you understand and are able to feel their pain with them.

The purpose of this instruction is to make sure that you become acquainted with a person at a distances so that you do not accidentally offend them or give them a bad impression. This is done to ensure that their personal space is respected in every situation, especially when speaking, since mouthwash and tooth paste had not yet been effectively invented, bad breath was a very common problem.

I am having a bit of trouble understanding exactly the importance of placing such significance upon allowing the man of higher position take the right hand position when walking together, especially since the english road system had been established so people drove their horsedrawn carriages down the left hand side, compared to the right hand side which is used by the United States.

The purpose for this instruction is to ensure that men stand at equal height when speaking, if they are of the same intellectual or authoritative stature, and also to make sure that everyone is treated with respect regardless, but especially when they are of higher power and position.

This instruction is given so that people respect the higher positions and authority of those who are in their current environment, to ensure that they understand that they are perceived by their acquaintances as being treated as having the authority and power they have gained not only in conversation but in passing as well.

The purpose of this instruction is to ensure that one does not become desensitised to the pain and suffering that the offender is going through to the point where we become non-confrontation when people are punished and abused and we ignore their anguish due to our inability to feel compassion even on the guilty.

This statement means that you should use the body language that is appropriate to the circumstances, so that their is no chance of misunderstanding due to conflicting or opposing signals, which can generate confusion and result in argument or conflict.

What George means by take care of your nails, but do not show great concern for them, is that you should not speak or make it known how much time you spend treating them, or purposely place your hands in a way that reveals how good you take care of them compared to others.

Even though I can immerse myself in my work to the point where noises around me such as people talking do not affect my concentration, but when someone moves the table continually by bumping their leg against it or jogging it with their body, I cannot concentrate to save my life.

This is one of the very few things that annoys me to no end, people humming or making noise with their fingers or pen, or anything else they by tapping it on a table. I notice that many of the things that we in the modern era teach to our younger students to establish control of their bodies was common knowledge in a person younger than me during the time this book was written.

This instruction means that you should not use your hands and have them contact any parts of your body that are not usually touched during normal social interaction, which does not include your arms, hands and shoulders which are the basic components body language.

I find it rather astounding that this very detailed and comprehensive etiquette and social behavior guide was written by George Washington when he was only 16 years old, as I had originally assumed that this document was written later in his life as a summary of all of the concepts and effective behavior methods he had learned throughout his life.

This is another example of how individuals in places of power such as the Presidency were coming to the realization that the Natives were humans, and therefore protected by the same document under which the white men who benefited from the Constitution. The establishment of indian schools would bring them into the modern age, while providing them with the same rights as their white neighbors and counterparts

This is the basis of establishing an orderly and equal civilization, when an unbiased, unpartisian law is used as a means of protecting and securing the rights of an individuals regardless of culture, race or ethnicity.

The law that dictates the relationship between Native Americans and the White settlers, has been purposely biased to the point where a white man can gain possession of Indian land merely by asking for it, and the indian without compensation is removed without question

Strangely, when the Natives were in the process of counting the dead they came upon the officer who had fought back with nothing more than a knife, and instead of stealing his belongings they were instructed to leave him, as he was dubbed the bravest man of all the white men they had killed.

The Indian strategie of surrounding the detail of soldiers in a circular rotating fashion which made mobile and almost impossible to hit from such as short distance. This prevented the deaths of all but a few of the horseback natives. The remaining officer was taken out as he attempted to lead the remaining survivors away from the attack but failed.

This story is a stark contrast between the previous record made by John, in terms of the subject the attackers the battle and the result. The major difference being that the victims of the Native American attack were armed soldiers on horseback, instead of the innocent women and children who were massacred by the white men and their bodies multilated beyond recognition.

I noticed that this is a documented record from the perspective of a Native American, which I derived from they way in which the author described the weapons used by the white men as well as they specific names of the tribes and the methods they used to ambush and overwhelm the soliders.

SInce the Native Americans did not have any written language, there are no existing original records of the experiences of these peoples as they were subjected to a new environment brought upon by the industrial development of the white man.

This is an example of how the Native Americans viewed their new and strict treatment while living on land that had once been uncontaminated by the houses and buildings of the white man. It documents how the natural and habitual ways of the native have been oppressed by the slow and sluggish traditions of the white man.