They consume music in order to beallowed to weep.
This emphasizes how powerful music can be on someone's emotions.
They consume music in order to beallowed to weep.
This emphasizes how powerful music can be on someone's emotions.
The actual function o f sentim ental music lies rather in the tem poraryrelease given to the awareness that one has missed fulfillment.
I think this is why music is so popular -- music can actually be really meaningful
Music today is largely a social cement
I wonder what this means
This natural language for the American listener stems from his earliest musical experiences,the nursery rhymes, the hymns he sings in Sunday school, the little tuneshe whistles on his way home from school. All these are vastly m ore important in the form ation o f musical language than his ability to distinguishthe beginning o f Brahm s’s Third Symphony from that of his Second.
I think this "natural language" is a little bit like building a musical vocabulary. For Jazz, one must be able to acquaint oneself with an arsenal of musical vocabulary in order to be able to improvise effectively.
Im itation offers a lead for coming to grips with the basic reasons for it.The musical standards of popular music were originally developed by acom petitive process.
This makes a lot of sense. It's almost like there was a "survival of the fittest" phenomenon with popular music that pushed popular music to become what it is today.
This dualism is not developed in a schematicway so that first the phrase o f the strings is elaborated, then the answer ofthe winds, and then the string them e is mechanically repeated.
I think that having one group of instruments say something and then having another group of instruments answer is a great way to develop some sort of story or mood to musical compositions, even without words. I find it very impressive.
For example, in the introductionof the first m ovem ent of B eethoven’s Seventh Symphony the second them e(in C-major) gets its true meaning only from the context. Only through thewhole does it acquire its particular lyrical and expressive quality— that is,a whole built up o f its very contrast with the cantus firmus—\ike characterof the first them e. Taken in isolation the second them e would be disrobedto insignificance
I agree with this statement. I think there are many songs that are a lot more meaningful and complete with knowledge of their contexts. If they didn't have context to back them up, then they would just be another song.
It is not overt like the latter but hidden behind a veneer ofindividual “effects” whose prescriptions are handled as the experts’ secret,however open this secret may be to musicians generally.
What does this mean?
This inexorable device guarantees that regardlesso f what aberrations occur, the hit will lead back to the same familiar experience, and nothing fundamentally novel will be introduced
People probably use this sort of structure as a template that demonstrates what works.
These assumptions concern notonly what takes place in the building but go deep into the nature of humanrelationships themselves.
It's like the author is implying that musicking and everything that revolves around musicking is meant to unite humans in their relationships.
It would not be stretching matters too far to call this building a sacredspace.
The author keeps on implying that the concert hall is a lot like a sacred space, almost like a church.
In general, discreet colors are favored: pastel, ocher or whitefor the piasterwork; the rich tones of natural wood; hangings in the colorsof natural dyes; seats upholstered in deep red, slate blue or soft sea green,with aisle carpets in matching or tastefully contrasting colors.
Maybe they're all discreet colors to not only show professionalism, but also to emphasize what is being shown on the stage.
We buy a booklet and thumb through it, more interested at this mo -ment perhaps in the crowd of people who, like ourselves,
It seems like the author is writing this while reminiscing on a memory of himself in a concert building
What’s really going on here?
This question is being repeated over and over again to emphasize its importance.
What does it mean when this performance (of this work) takes place at thistime, in this place, with these participants?
I suppose this is the same thing as adding context to your thoughts about the meaning of the piece. Adding context can really enhance the listening experience.
One wonders, in that case, why we should bother performing musi-cal works at all, when we could just sit at home, like Brahms, and readthem as if they were novels.
I think the interpretation of a piece of music given by a musician is also something that can be worthy of listening to. Musicians can play pieces of music with a sad tone, a happy tone, or any other kind of tone -- it all depends on how those musicians interpret the piece.
“The supreme reality of art,” he wrote, “is the isolated, self-contained work.”
I think this is what makes art so special. It's just an expression of the artist, and the only thing that the viewer of the art can do is interpret it.
In addition, musicology is, almost by definition, concerned withWestern classical music, while other musics, including even Western popu -lar musics, are dealt with under the rubric of ethnomusicology (the realmusical study of Western popular musics, in their own terms rather thanthose of classical music, is only just beginning and does not yet dare to callitself musicology).
I guess it kind of makes sense why classical music would be preferred -- classical music is probably seen as a sort of foundational kind of music, and it was used to play for lots of aristocrats back in the older days, so it probably has had a reputation for being designed for the educated.
“What is the meaning of music?”
I also don't think this is an answerable question -- it's such a broad an abstract question.