228 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2023
    1. What we’re finding in the market is that the buyers are trying to initiate these [green-steel] deals, but it’s not enough to shift the investment case for a producer,”
    1. Supporters say it would be more efficient for these offshore wind projects to sell all of their electricity to the state instead of a selling pieces of it to multiple utility companies, helping to control costs and keep rates lower.

      how?

    2. surcharge imposed on Californians’ electricity bills

      oof

  2. Jul 2023
    1. At the same time, even well designed rates will be an approximation of the underlying cost structure, as it is impractical to present the complete underlying details of utility costs to individual customers.

      tell that to NEM detractors

    1. ISO New England estimates that every 700 MW of solar capacity reduces oil consumption by 7 to 10 million gallons or gas demand by 1 to 1.5 billion cubic feet.

      average rooftop installation = 7kW = 100,000 homes for 700MW

    1. European Union is looking to include the shipping industry in its mandatory cap-and-trade carbon market, more commonly known as its emissions trading scheme, as early as 2022,

      go EU

    2. ohn Kerry in April announced the U.S. will join Saudi Arabia as the second of only two countries pledging to work toward the IMO’s greenhouse gas goal.

      why saudi arabia for IMO ghg goal?

    3. drop was primarily due to increased ship size, and design and operational improvements such as decreased traveling speed

      intensity has dropped slightly, but overall emissions have still increased.

      thanks to slower speeds, larger ships, and design/ops improvements

    1. According to a recent report by the UN International Maritime Organization, that number could increase to 17 percent by 2050.

      holy shit

    1. IMO watchers said China, Brazil, Argentina, South Africa, Belarus, Uruguay, Peru, Venezuela, Ecuador, Saudi Arabia, Angola, Colombia, Paraguay, Cuba, Russia and Bangladesh resisted tough interim targets.

      china, brazil, south africa, russia, argentina, etc

  3. Jun 2023
    1. Hydrogen and ammonia are also less energy-dense than fossil fuels, potentially necessitating ship redesigns for optimal storage.

      interesting of note

    1. Since trucks dedicated to moving goods from ports to warehouses rarely travel longer than 100 miles per day, they’re ideal for electrification.

      Smart

    2. Electric-truck technology is “light-years ahead” of federal and most states’ requirements

      interesting. good to connect with SC Garcia on this

    1. Similarly, the emotional water signs — Cancer, Scorpio, and Pisces — might take Sagittarius's blunt commentary a bit too personally, resulting in lots of hurt feelings.

      LOLLLL

    1. I use the solar PV analog scenario to estimate the volume of hydrogen covered by looser annual matching rules for different phase-in dates (2024-2032) & regimes (e.g., phase-out w/no grandfathering, placed in service w/grandfathering, commence construction w/grandfathering)

      I want these Excel skills

    1. written down the value of their ANS natural gas pipeline development costs to zero.

      i need a finance/accounting debrief on how this works and how fossil fuel plants could use the same

    2. the Alaska LNG project wouldn’t come online for at least 10 years so would have no effect on alleviating current shortages.

      this is not great

    3. While presented as a “temporary” solution, Alaska LNG would lock in an enormous amount of fossil fuel use and production beyond 2050, deepening the climate crisis.

      are there any other uses for LNG pipelines? green H?

    1. different ways of de-growth of the economy,

      de growth is already such a loaded term lol

    2. not enough minerals on the planet to replace every internal combustion engine with an electric vehicle

      this is wild. and not talked about enough

    3. bringing those experts to First Nations and helping them review and really be a part of the project,”

      such a good basic idea

    4. The very idea of Free, Prior and Informed Consent is too often unclear, Aspen found,

      this is the key thesis ( and my take away from the Indigenous Lands capstone)

    1. PG&E has focused billions of dollars and large portions of its workforce on burying and hardening its grid to prevent it from sparking deadly wildfires like those that drove it into bankruptcy in 2019, thereby reducing its capacity to connect new customers.

      ugh ugh.. ugh

    2. The roughly 33,500 drayage trucks serving California ports have an even tighter deadline of 2035 for going emissions-free — a tough target for trucking companies and independent drivers facing high upfront electric truck costs and sparse

      port trucking options

    3. bigger than Forum’s first eight-charger site at the Port of Long Beach,

      port freight charging!!

    1. every 100 megawatts of community solar [and] storage that gets built on warehouses and other large urban buildings instead of out in rural areas or the California desert, $175 [million] to $375 million in additional quantifiable value for ratepayers will be generated over the life of the projects, based on an average [project] lifespan of 25 years.”

      calc how they got this

    1. doesn’t mean it’s devoid of life. Microbes called methanogens inhabit its depths; they can devour organic matter in anoxic environments. When that happens, they release carbon-containing methane (CH4), a greenhouse gas that is shorter-lived than CO2 but 84 times more potent over a 20-year timeframe.

      omg

    2. The company is striving to sequester a gigaton per year by 2030, initially at $200 per ton of CO2, then decreasing to $80 per ton of CO2 once Rewind has optimized its supply chain, he said.

      less than the $100/tn DOE aiming for but more than the $50/tn Charm wants

    3. For one, organic carbon sequestration is notoriously difficult to measure,

      good to know

    1. James is heading a research project to determine whether the rock waste stockpiled at mine sites can be safely and effectively dusted over fields to sequester CO2.

      would it not potentially oxidize/whatever in co2 again?

    2. The facility will be designed to produce and recycle 2.2 tons of sulfuric acid and remove 1 ton of CO2 per day, according to its application to Stripe’s Frontier fund.

      2:1 ratio of sulfuric acid to CO2 - more a mine tailings upcycle than co2 removal

      and relies on electricity- additional load demand

    1. Ultimately, for Charm to succeed in removing substantial amounts of CO2, the company will need to not only limit risks and optimize technology but also significantly drive down its costs. Reinhardt said the company aims to lower its per-ton cost of CO2 removal from $600 to $50, below the U.S. Department of Energy’s own goal of achieving a cost of $100 per metric ton.

      holy

    2. Schmidt was the lead author on a 2018 paper that analyzed the merits of pyrolyzing biomass as a way of keeping carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. He said that, when it comes to bio-oil, ​“It really depends on how and where you store it. There is a risk of leakage. There is a risk of environmental harm. It’s nasty stuff.

      exactly what i thought!!

    3. Charm claimed it sequestered 24.3 metric tons of CO2 on April 11. But, after subtracting its emissions, the startup said it delivered only 19.3 tons of ​“net” carbon removal.

      i didn't realize they didn't actual reduce the claimed emissions

    4. Preventing emissions, they argue, is different from removing emissions that already occurred.

      oh huh wow yeah

    5. Organic waste, such as corn stover or wood chips, is heated at high temperatures in the absence of oxygen. The decomposed biomass takes three forms: a solid residue (biochar), a viscous fluid (bio-oil) and a synthetic gas (biogas). Engineers can tweak the temperatures and speeds, with ​“slow pyrolysis” yielding more biochar and ​“fast pyrolysis” delivering more liquid and gas.

      this is the main definition I needed!

    6. rising competition from biofuel-hungry transportation and chemical industries could potentially constrain the available supply of agricultural and forestry residues and push up prices for raw materials

      this seems like a big issue to me

    1. reduction in greenhouse gases (CO2 equivalent) of 1.5 billion tons per year in 2050.

      how to quant climate benefits

    2. The report offers a few ways to think about the impact of these reductions: They’d equate to over $1.2 trillion in public-health benefits in the form of over 100,000 avoided premature deaths, nearly 3 million avoided asthma attacks and the avoidance of over 13 million lost workdays.

      read report to get methods and metrics

    1. If the only reason why Country X is able to do that is because they pay below-market wages or they pour battery acid in the ocean, stuff we wouldn’t allow here, that’s just a regulatory-arbitrage question.

      ah here we go

    2. But free trade that’s regulatory arbitrage is not free trade.

      i wish i understood what this meant

    1. Why are electric rates for the California utilities so high?  Almost every possible influence on the average cost and unit price for electricity is present, including basic revenue requirement issues, above-market costs in rates, social programs, and rate design.

      not sure what this is getting at

    2. “income-graduated fixed charges” (IGFC), designed to increase bills for those with higher income, decrease bills for those with lower income, and reduce the per-kWh charge.

      i've seen this referred to as Ramsey pricing as well

    1. One challenge that’s come up as the idea has taken off is that no one can seem to agree about what it should be called. While the term is “networked geothermal” in Massachusetts, New York is using “thermal energy network.” Magavi said it’s also been referred to as “community geothermal,”

      this is so energy-community coded

    2. The project in Framingham involves building a new set of pipelines alongside the gas system.

      this seems expensive given the previous paragraph

    1. 20 to 25 percent of their peak electricity demand would ​“ensure high levels of reliability and resilience

      this seems like a good rule of thumb - what peak demand? annual total peak? i suppose 20% of max ever would be useful

    2. setting minimum transfer requirements between regional transmission organizations.

      interesting

    1. While Kevala predicts that EV charging will hit a peak at 9 pm – thanks to non-EV specific time-of-use rates that drop at that time – the Public Advocates Office’s research is based on forecasts that EV charging will occur much more evenly across the day, the office said. “We believe it is of paramount importance to understand the operational and cost implications of increased electrification to ensure system planning is undertaken optimally and that the most cost-effective approaches are taken

      interesting- not sure which scenario is more likely off the top of my head

    2. System-level peak load, meanwhile, could increase 56% on average from 2025 to 2035, predominantly due to electric vehicles, according to the study.

      without load shifting or efficiency measures

    1. regulatory action — especially a rule due out from the SEC that would set reporting standards for companies making environmental claims to investors — stand to upend the ESG ecosystem.

      this is good tho

    2. Those sectors, he said, have struggled to close all but the top tier deals in recent months.

      yessss

    1. ‘look, we need to diversify the sources of capital for the industry’, whether it’s [asset-backed securities], debt private placement, traditional bonds,”

      i clearly need someone to explain the financial sector to me

    1. report defines clean power as onshore and offshore wind, utility-scale solar and battery storage technology

      doesn't include DERs and rooftop solar, or geothermal

    1. how local and coastal communities and supply chains are considered are equally important.

      seeing very little discourse on local communities and their input, mostly just transition focused on workers - does that include local, port workers? not just seafarers

    1. DNV believes that because of its comparatively simple engineering and design requirements, methanol is likely to be adopted mainly by smaller ships

      hm smaller ships but would need 2.5x fuel tank sizes?

    2. Carbon emissions from green methanol would be considered as climate-neutral because combustion would not add more CO2

      interesting

    1. Electricity “deregulation” hasn’t led to probably lower costs for consumers 2. As NERC has continually warned, grid reliability is a major concern 3. Renewable mandates/subsidies are adding to reliability concerns

      hm not sure about this

    1. . This degree of cost increase could delay the ability to produce green hydrogen at cost parity to lower-cost, blue or grey hydrogen, ultimately hindering the economic competitiveness and adoption of both grid-connected and 100% renewable green hydrogen as a low carbon fuel.

      most renewable energy practitioners and leaders doubt this.

      article seen as fossil fuel propo

    2. Conversely, hourly matching requirements, depending on their implementation, could result in unfavorable economics for green hydrogen adoption, by limiting operating hours to those when renewable resources are available, ultimately reducing the electrolyzer capacity factor.

      hmmmm storage??

    3. This analysis was then benchmarked against our based case hourly generation, pricing and emissions data for each market.

      not exactly sure what this part means

    1. The TCR study was supported by a grant from Meta Platforms, a leading clean energy corporate user. Meta is part of the Emissions First Partnership, which supports carbon matching. Companies in the group, launched in December, include Amazon, General Motors and Intel.

      LMAO okay the study funded by Meta, part of the emissions first partnership that wants to hit carbon neutrality of avoided emissions (i don't think there's a clear process for measuring that yet with energy sources)

      the hourly matching scenario held to the most stringest standards of hourly, local CFE matching while all other scenarios much looser with geographic bounds or standards. hourly matching in my mind can be additional sources outside of grid used, because it places a premium on tough to decarbonize times such as peak evening loads

    2. “We don’t necessarily need more wind in Texas or solar in California, so the idea is how do we be a bit more strategic with deploying energy so we actually shave off those locations and times that are not yet carbon-free,” he said.

      hmmm i don't necessarily agree with this, my idea is that we build up cheap wind and solar and wait for storage units to become more cost effective as there are still fossil fuels being burned at peak solar times of day

    3. The study found that local, hourly energy matching is the least efficient strategy for cutting carbon emissions. It fails to achieve carbon neutrality on an hourly basis and only achieves annual carbon neutrality,

      interesting...

    4. ompanies buy emissions-free power in areas with high carbon emissions from power plants, such as in the Southwest Power Pool and parts of the upper Midwest, without considering how close those sources are to where the electricity is being used, he said. Sourcing renewable electricity from those areas will displace more carbon than, for example, purchases from California, which already has a high amount of emissions-free resources, he said.

      not sure how i feel about this

    1. As with other short-lived species, the radiative forcing from a continuous emission of hydrogen is proportional to emission rates, whereas the radiative forcing from a continuous emission of carbon dioxide is closely related to cumulative emissions.

      emissions rates important for hydrogen, not cumulative as is for CO2

    1. eat pump adoption is strongly correlated with geography, climate, and electricity prices

      i wonder when heat pumps started to become widely adopted and why especially in the south

    2. 15% of U.S. households have a heat pump as their primary heating equipment, and this is essentially the same for all levels of household income

      low levels- based off contractor recommendations?

    3. One concern with subsidies for low-carbon technologies is that they tend to go predominantly to high-income households.

      NEM 3.0 with residential solar

  4. May 2023
    1. adopted a bill to require a higher threshold to win an air permit in an environmental justice area in the state's major cities

      love this idea for air pollution policy

    1. the shorthand for the policy utilities want is “ROFR,” or “right of first refusal.”

      Right of First Refusal - increasingly recognized as major roadblock to building transmission competitively and efficiently

      in what jurisdictions is it still applied?

    1. highlighted by the Brookings Institution to send challenges to the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

      The Brookings Institute? I don't know them for much environmental or energy related stuff.

      DC circuit leans D? from what I remember

    2. imposing strict time limits on environmental reviews while also increasing funding to ensure regulators have the capacity to meet those deadlines.

      not a big fan of arbitrary time limits

    3. a mess created by decades of well-intentioned efforts to prevent corporations from running roughshod over the interests of individuals, communities and the environment

      "running roughshod" great

      also good note

    4. Congress has empowered the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to approve major natural gas pipelines, which helped to expedite construction during the fracking boom

      yes true but also community engagement and reducing impact on communities that face outsized burdens of industrialization is important too

      but glad to see NEPA isn't being gutted as first rec

    5. 2028

      23 years after proposing

    1. Rather than assign costs based on whether or not a specific project triggers a grid upgrade, customers could pay a fixed fee based on the size of their system. That option has already been implemented or is being explored in a growing number of jurisdictions, said Enbar of EPRI.

      interested in where that has been implemented

    2. the Colorado Public Utilities Commission found that the process for linking distributed energy resources to the grid was “fairly smooth,

      ha this is comical after this entire article

    3. company has expanded training programs and office hours to help people understand the interconnection process, as well as removed certain steps in the process to make it more efficient, Klemm said.

      interested in seeing the % time reduction after implementing these changes, along with start length

    4. Utilities say they are constantly refining their processes

      lol

    5. community solar installations fell 21 percent and small commercial installations fell 10 percent in the third quarter of 2021 compared with the previous quarter

      community solar and smaller scale solar developments still face interconnection difficulties

    1. Eligibility will be granted to customers who live in affordable housing, participate in utility income-based bill-assistance programs, and reside in census tracts where median household incomes are below 80 percent of median incomes in the surrounding area.

      this is a lot of stipulations for a community benefits program

    2. many states with large-scale community-solar programs are facing distribution connection problems of their own.

      examlpe here is CO - did not read far enough into specifics of why

    3. LBNL data indicates that projects of less than 20 megawatts — developments that typically connect to lower-voltage distribution grids rather than transmission grids — tend to be able to execute interconnection agreements much more quickly than larger projects.

      of course there is no universal rule- seems like a patchwork of regulations based on utility or regulated market, but seems like can extrapolate < 20 MW --> shorter waiting time

    4. workaround to interconnection logjams

      ha here we go

    5. Google and EDPR’s program will function much like community-solar programs, which allow developers to build smaller-scale projects and sell the power to individual subscribers to defray a portion of their utility bills.

      I wonder if they get around interconnection issues through this design

    1. advocating for federal action and resources to address the challenges at SONGS and remove the nuclear waste out of the region

      well ofc he wants it out of the region isn't that the problem everywhere?

    2. I will continue to work with my colleagues in the Spent Nuclear Fuel Solutions Caucus

      this is a caucaus?

    1. Rory Jacobson, a senior advisor for deployment at the DOE, who co-authored a new report outlining pathways to ​“commercial liftoff” for carbon management.

      Yale MEM alum

  5. Apr 2023
    1. solar power projects were the leader—not just among energy projects, but all projects—in terms of avoiding cost overruns. Electricity transmission lines are second best, followed by wind power projects

      electricity transmission lines- i wonder if this is because they don't have to bid for projects and try to artificially lower expected costs. esp if built by utilities they have a handle on construction and timelines?

    1. For his part, Mr. Sheridan thinks renewable projects will gobble up the region’s farmland. He just doesn’t think he’ll live long enough to see that day.

      anti-solar after construction

    1. Jenny Chase@solar_chase·Apr 9All of those have proved slow and expensive to deploy in the past, and are one reason US solar costs more and builds slower than European solar. Fundamentally have to question why it's renewable energy's job to fix general inequality (while agreeing inequality is a problem!)

      interesting take

    1. LDES, most have no market mechanism in place to pay them

      hydro as LDES (10hours+). need for storage, but few markets to pay them. are there markets they are excluded from?

    2. As a result the BAU case for LDES is only $9-12B through 2030, despite it being an essential way for us to decarbonize the grid. Remember we need $100B scale to achieve our #EarthShot cost reductions so we need to find/make some more markets.

      $9-12B instead of $100B needed

    1. The Bureau of Land Management issued a notice to proceed for the project Tuesday after some 15 years of permitting work,

      That's insane

    1. At this point — about a week after ovulation — the person who has had all these changes happening inside their body still has no idea it has been going on.

      up until implantation and continued through some later point - not detectable

    2. This is the moment of fertilization, otherwise known as conception

      the permeation of biblical language in this medical area really weirds me out

    3. If sexual intercourse happens the same day as ovulation (or even several days beforehand), that's when sperm may enter the picture.

      this is still wild to me- that it's a few day window and so many accidental pregnancies happen

    4. (Assisted reproductive technologies have greatly expanded how ovulation and fertilization can happen so that many more people can have babies. What we're describing here is what happens when that assistance isn't needed.)

      what are these technologies?

    5. The EPA estimates that complying with the proposed rules would add $633 to the cost of making a vehicle in 2027 and about $1,200 per vehicle in 2032.

      but can contrast that with lower maintenance costs

    1. Another option is building new sources of clean energy that can be constructed closer to where demand is needed, like small nuclear reactors

      love how nuclear is always the resource instead of solar and storage

    1. opponents of hourly matching noted that the European Commission appeared to be backing away from rules that would require green-hydrogen producers to match their production with clean power, arguing that that was an indication that similar rules wouldn’t work in the U.S.

      tricky!! EU were able to set rules that indicate it would be doable

    2. projects will likely have difficulty securing financing if developers need to meet an hourly matching requirement with no common framework for compliance

      interesting- sounds like there is a common framework. but financing must be secured before projects start which could push back development

    3. The Edison Electric Institute, a trade group for investor-owned utilities in the U.S., noted in its comments to the IRS that requiring hourly matching would disadvantage producers in parts of the country that lack the wind and sun resources for rapid clean-energy growth.

      yeah i mean don't we want to decrease emissions and not incentivize greater co2 for H2

  6. Mar 2023
    1. manufacturers, influenced by Victorian notions of masculinity and femininity, devised a kind of ‘separate spheres’ ideology about automobiles: gas cars were for men, electric cars were for women

      WILD

    1. A lot of retailers are starting to think about how to make the 15 to 30 minutes of a charging session into experiences that are engaging for the customer and lucrative for business

      partnerships with chargers and retailers seems like an obvious capitalistic strategy - use brand reputation to associate (blue sign of walmart with green electrify america chargers) with a captive audience/customers

    2. 8. There’s still not much to do while you wait On both trips, another thing held true: Highway charging means wandering through a lot of Walmarts.

      this is so interesting to me - what does this mean socially and culturally shifting to EVs from gas

    3. Range is often hindered by low temperatures. However, the November trip had spells that were not especially cold — temperatures in the desert West in November ranged from the low 20s to the low 50s Fahrenheit.

      yeah what are the low temps (-20F??) that affect battery range

    4. he vehicle fell short of its promise. My battery never exceeded 240 miles of range, even when full

      240 miles of range compared to promised 320 miles and this is in the west where cold temps can be relatively moderate (so likely shouldn't be a big issue?)

    1. argued that phasing out production would hike gas prices and make LA dependent on foreign energy.

      what are some of the rebuttals to this? oil drilled here likely not going to LA customer use and gas prices mostly from refinery prices. they are focused on keep LA residents unhealthy and slowly the transition to renewable energy. if they really cared about lowering gas prices and reliance on foreign energy they would shift their business model towards one of solar, abundant in LA enjoyed by all.

    1. The bottom line is nonetheless that we continue to have a lack of viable business models to bring these new concepts into markets and a continued policy failure to regulate carbon in most national, not to mention international settings.

      Interesting. "regulate carbon in national settings" directly yes, but there are standards typically at the relevant scale

    2. What has changed dramatically is that ideas that were advanced only at the scientific ‘fringes’ by a few original thinkers such as Freeman Dyson at Princeton or Cesare Marchetti at IIASA (who were both early pioneers in thinking about geoengineering and large-scale carbon management) have become ‘mainstream’.

      This seems like a purely technology focus viewpoint. Policy, social attitudes and acceptance, investment scale have all improved dramatically, as well as social and frontline group community power to focus on just transition work

    1. designate FERC as the siting authority for transmission facilities with capacity ratings of 1,000 MW or greater, as called for in Senator Sheldon Whitehouse’s (D-R.I.) Streamlining Interstate Transmission of Electricity Act (SITE) Act, a

      oh here it is i think

    2. recently enhanced existing authorities for transmission siting and permitting that could be effectively deployed, and FERC also has ongoing rulemakings that can address the interconnection backlog, cost allocation for transmission, and regional planning

      guessing this is more federal level of oversight and approval compared to current state patchwork system

    3. creating a centralized database to track project timelines and approval processes,

      really like this idea and SOMEBODY LET ME AT IT

    1. Based on the average electricity rate and the fact that transmission and distribution generally account for two-thirds of utility bills,

      this seems like a generous estimation and v generalized as well. i'm all for these arguments, but would wish to see more hard numbers and empirical evidence

    2. Instead, utilities and their allies have produced and perpetuated a farce of free delivery by constantly comparing the cost of large-scale solar installations to rooftop solar.

      it's interesting but maybe a bit more complicated since rooftop solar needs distribution system for net metering contributions

    1. resource adequacy and renewable energy to San Diego Community Power,

      hell yes!

    2. unique 1:1 configuration — 137 MW of solar, coupled with 150 MW/600 MWh of battery energy storage — will allow it to shift daytime solar production to late afternoon and evening hours

      okay so peaking solar is just solar+storage haha i do like the term peaking solar to differentiate it from just standalone solar projects

    3. The Vikings Energy Farm is among the first solar peaker plants in the United States

      vikings! peaking solar!

    1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission authorized Pacific Gas & Electric to continue operating the 2,240 MW Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant in California as it considers the power plant’s expected license renewal application, the agency said Thursday.

      oh yes it is still operating, duh. i thought it had been decommissioned but it was just planned to next year

    1. measurement and verification procedures are as accurate as possible to prevent overpayments by double counting resources.

      double counting - seems like CA programs that prevent DERs from being compensated for multiple grid services despite ability and efficiency in doing so

    1. utilities have invested in places where demand for electricity was increasing. This dynamic has led to underinvestment in the grids that serve many lower-income and disadvantaged communities. That translates into a lack of infrastructure to support rooftop solar, backup batteries and EV chargers, as a recent study of California’s grid indicated.

      seems like it might be able to actually

    2. That kind of analysis could have taken weeks of time using manual methods, she said. But after asking UrbanFootprint to take it on, ​“the next business day, they had a map of all the real estate that’s qualified and all of the land parcels.”

      pretty amazing, wonder if the cost is feasible for local govs

      does this replace utility interconnection data? probably not

    1. One crucial issue, the authors write, is whether workers will be willing to relocate if good jobs are not available locally. They note that fossil fuel workers in some regions like west Texas may be more willing to relocate than others in places like Appalachia, whose families may have lived in the region for generations.

      lots of FF jobs are highly variable in relating through boom and bust cycles already, but other areas like Appalachia are much less likely to do so

    1. Under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) can issue loan guarantees to projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

      another great example of DOE funding put to creative use

    2. One way to mitigate these costs is securitization. Similar to refinancing a home mortgage at a lower interest rate, securitization refers to refinancing higher-cost utility debt or equity with low-interest, ratepayer-backed bonds.

      Finally a great and easy explainer for securitization. Refinancing at lower-rate, ratepayer-backed bonds. With gov, could this be combined with pretax bonds? similar to EBCE municipal bonds (green bonds)

    1. or for enhanced oil recovery (EOR).

      EOR is wild to me. Subsidize capturing carbon from the air for use to generate more carbon-emitting oil resources down the line.

    1. To raise money to pre-pay for the power, EBCE issues bonds through a public bond issuance “conduit.” EBCE and three other CCAs recently created the California Community Choice Financing Authority (CCCFA),

      I Had no idea this was even possible

    1. The good news is that we can actually build renewable energy that *expands* transmission capacity if it connects and serves local load,

      I guess the argument is that siting energy sources at consumption sites reduces the need for transmission capacity to supply from further away? is there evidence around that?

    1. Between 2016 and 2020, FERC implemented a series of rules that aim to preempt state energy policy by limiting how resources subsidized by state or local policy are considered in capacity markets

      This is still wild to me

    1. "Those customers who have the least carbon impact on the state will be paying nearly double for this as compared to those customers that have the highest carbon impact on the state," he said he was referring to utilities operating in the New York City area.

      this is an interesting line. is he saying customers in the new york city area have the largest carbon impact? i think that is generally untrue, especially lifestyle wise and home and transport associated emissions.

  7. Feb 2023
    1. In Taiwan and South Korea, industrial-policy agencies don’t only hand out money; they constantly gather information from the private sector and use it to adjust goals and policies over time.

      i can't see this working well in the US just from a scale and size issue, our country is geographically, population-wise, and economically larger than both taiwan and south korea and companies can organize groups to lobby the gov on their own

    2. did not emerge from careful study and bipartisan consensus building, but from intraparty haggling and a harried legislative process

      i mean very little of US law and policy is careful study over politics and negotiation, and bipartisan consensus is vastly overrated

    3. which has, virtually since the abolition of slavery, derived a good deal of its industrial energy from extracting carbon from the ground and setting it on fire — find a new primary energy source?

      this is so wild and true and i've never thought about slavery as the original source of primary energy in the american economy

    1. alongside clarity in the connectivity and orientation of terminology, there is large potential for greater impact through transdisciplinary research that involves academics co-producing knowledge with practitioners and activists.

      this resource seems very academic in nature, despite calling for greater integration and interdisciplinary work with practitioners and activists

    1. This is where the EIR can help. The EIR will give DOE’s Loan Programs Office (LPO) new authority to provide economic opportunity for fossil-dependent communities while accelerating the clean energy transition.

      this is perfect for the CEED program

    2. Energy Infrastructure Reinvestment program (EIR).

      Truly I've never heard of this

    1. grave

      i hate this article so much

    2. For example, the growing electric vehicle industry may help reduce carbon emissions but it will also cause a massive jump in the demand for lithium and other minerals.

      ugh I'm so mad at this example being used. EVs are one of the best purchases and use of private capital we have towards significantly reducing emissions on an individual/household level. the demand for lithium will be higher yes, but that is a supply chain and env protections issue that can and will be addressed.

    3. What often hides behind these “green” labels is the large carbon footprint their production generates.

      yes, buying things has a carbon footprint but for EVs it is much smaller than other things that are better to just use through to when they would no longer be used.

    4. For one, the organisations that are supposed to certify that indeed enough tree-planting has taken place do not have the tools to verify that the declared emissions will definitely be absorbed. Another problem is that many offsetting activities do not actually offset anything.

      Would be interested in some sources outside of the one link to his claims.

    5. this deception is tantamount to the genocide of the hundreds of millions of people who will perish from the effects of climate change within the next century because things are that bad.

      omg

    6. governments and corporations have teamed up to turn the apocalypse into a money-making opportunity. They have rushed to put forward false solutions to the climate crisis: from the push to replace fuel-engine vehicles with electric ones, to so-called climate-smart agriculture, to protected areas for nature conservation and massive tree planting projects for carbon offsets

      this is so annoying. they are the most plausible solutions we have right now and yes there are more fundamental issues to tackle around public transit and access with equity, but this is not a conspiracy

    1. have been working on overhead irrigation, they’ve been working on subsurface drip irrigation, and in my book, all of these hold a lot of promise,

      maybe i don't know enough about the specifics of alfalfa growing, but subsurface drip irrigation has been touted for over 10 years. maybe a sign of implementation and its pace, at least in conservative ag circles?

    1. He said one promising proposal would build one or more large desalination plants in Mexico to tap the Sea of Cortez, a project that officials from Arizona have been discussing with their Mexican counterparts.

      this seems like a way of offshoring potential impacts to Mexico from desal

  8. Jan 2023
    1. Bigger turbines, mass production, and larger projects have driven major cost declines across Europe. The U.K.’s 2022 offshore wind auction yielded contracts for 7 GW of capacity at an average of $54 per megawatt-hour, down from $147/MWh in 2014-2015.

      2022 $54/MWh in UK auction

    1. Uprating the three units at Helms Pumped Storage Facility to increase the amount of clean, hydroelectric power that PG&E can provide customers during peak periods, and help integrate additional intermittent renewable resources;

      more hydropower pumped storage

      uprate to what?

    2. adding over 1,000 electric vehicles to PG&E’s fleet by 2026;

      what's the % out of how many total in fleet

    3. Working with customers to remove overhead wires in remote high fire-threat areas, and replace with stand-alone power systems to offer a new approach to utility service.

      this is interesting the way they frame it as "a new approach to utility service" - if theyoperate the distribution system it's just a utility-operated microgrid (ish i know there are generation ownership complications)

  9. Dec 2022
    1. Iceland is planning for this future increased flow by building hydro plants that can be expanded as glacial runoff increases

      this is somewhat extremely depressing

    2. Iceland is still building new hydropower plants, and the consensus among energy experts and the general public is that hydro is good for Iceland and is 100% renewable regardless of the size of the plant.

      what is the environmental/ecological difference in iceland around damming rivers than in the US or more temperate areas?

    1. we didn’t have an alternative perspective from the environmental movement, saying, “We want to expedite permitting for renewables. We just don’t want to expedite a pipeline.”

      hmm this feels a bit disingenous. it might have been foisted fairly quickly without engagement beforehand.

    1. Dominion anticipates SMRs “could be a feasible supply-side resource as soon as the early 2030s,” and the company has thus included SMRs as a “supply-side option starting in December 2032” in all alternative plans.

      this seems ambitious?

    1. Because avoided cost is a general value applied across the entire California grid, the ACC can’t be used to capture locational benefits down to the level of individual substations and grid circuits,

      oh this is very important. NY PSC uses locational pricing in its DER compensation rates

  10. Nov 2022
    1. Even with strong cash flow in the short term, producers have more to gain from offloading wells and the associated liability — chiefly expensive environmental cleanup — than from pumping more oil and gas, experts say.

      This is infuriating

    1. Lithium Americas has said the archaeological work does not affect its plans to begin construction on the full mine site next spring.

      i'm sorry how does it not

    1. the BLM approved the mine after sending just three letters to the tribal councils of the Summit Lake, Fort McDermitt, and Winnemucca Indian Colony tribes, well before most members knew anything about the project

      seems like this should be enforceable after Quechan v DOI case in 2011

    1. "We now know horses have evolved on the North American continent," she says. "They should be considered native."

      This is interesting of a note, what is considered native/invasive and at what time period and for how long?

  11. Oct 2022
    1. It started getting into the area where our local herd of wild horses had reduced the fuel...large areas that were grazed open became safe zones for Cal Fire personnel and equipment that were stationed in front of the fire," Simpson says. "These horses helped mitigate the Klamathon Fire."

      what are the other impacts of horses? over grazing? soil compaction? increased prey availability?

    1. these targets are “currently not credible” since most countries don’t have policies in place to achieve them.

      woof

    1. that water rights were reserved for tribes as an implication of the treaties that created the reservations

      this makes so much basic sense but the american legal system has warped my brain and this feels incredible

    2. It was also held that when American Indian reservations were created by the United States government, they were created with the intention of allowing the American Indian settlements to become self-reliant and self-sufficient

      amazing that this basic level of recognition by the SC is a bit incredible for me

    1. Those include a survey plan, three communication plans with Native American tribes, agencies and a new one for fisheries, which are all due within 120 days of the lease execution.

      does 120 days allow for communication with tribes to form adequate communication plans?

    1. Now, despite having a reserve of gas that could make a major contribution to bolstering European energy supplies, the government is wary of reopening the throttle at Groningen for fear of a backlash, especially from residents.

      this framing is SO typical of the NYT

    1. ignorant of the centrality of Indigenous people in the successful millennia-long conservation of the natural environments and biodiversity. 

      most people still do not know and media outlets do not center the indigenous narrative and perspective enough

    1. One possible reason, Mulvaney said, is the existence of long-distance power lines that previously carried coal power to L.A. and other cities. Many of those lines were built across public lands — and now they have spare capacity as coal plants shut down.

      OH this is an interesting point that I haven't seen brought up elsewhere

    2. The Nature Conservancy’s study assumes 35% of the West’s overall rooftop solar potential will actually get installed by 2050 — an ambitious target, although some rooftop solar supporters might argue we can do even better.

      interesting assumption

    3. Agriculture is the economic cornerstone for many rural communities, not to mention the source of the food we eat. Across the country, small-town residents have rallied to protest proposed solar projects in particular, since those facilities often — but don’t always — preclude farming.

      seems unlikely that farms will convert to solar farms given the labor and economic differences

    4. The windiest spots also tend to be far from major population centers. Solar farms can be built closer to big cities with the biggest energy needs, including Los Angeles and Phoenix, meaning they require fewer miles of habitat-disrupting power lines.

      this is also an interesting point - power lines definitely do disrupt natural habitat but not to the same extent as solar farms can (and compared to wind farms)

    5. One of them is building fewer wind farms in the West’s windiest states, particularly Wyoming, and more solar farms in the sunny desert Southwest.

      interesting finding- i wonder how it matches up with our 24/7 model

    1. retrograde

      exactly how I see this "upgrade" and "improvement"

    2. placing an emphasis on the spiritual and functional purposes of the objects for the people who made them, and incorporating testimony from community representatives about government repression of their culture.

      feels like the most minimal step they could take

    1. Newsom did not propose any specific changes in policy toward Native American communities, though tribal leaders raised concerns about issues such as managing natural resources, preventing wildfires and addressing the historical trauma

      and then this immediate follow up feels significant

    2. Mark Macarro, tribal chairman of the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians, said the apology is significant.ADVERTISEMENT“To hear an apology like that today from the head of this state sets a new tone. It does for me, on a personal level,” said Macarro.

      not exactly sure why but this made me slightly tear up

    1. monitoring salmon after the removal of a century-old defunct dam in the redwood forests in the Santa Cruz mountains and testing for toxins in shellfish

      okay seems specific to Santa Cruz area

    2. 200 miles of coastline

      where is this 200 miles? not a high number

    3. California has 109 federally-recognized tribes, the second highest number in the country behind Alaska

      i didn't know this! CA has the second highest number of federally recognized tribes

    1. Congress has plenary power to decide what’s best for the Indians,

      paternalistic view

    2. leading to Supreme Court decisions that further damaged sovereignty, Wharton said. The nation’s high court ruled in 1903 that the government didn’t have to get permission from tribes before dividing the land.

      wild!!!

    1. Sunnova said its systems would not be completely isolated. It plans to connect them to the larger statewide grid so it could send excess power to other utilities or draw energy in case of an emergency. But its systems would not be owned or operated by the three major power providers in the state — Pacific Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison or San Diego Gas & Electric.

      i'm interested in how this would work regulation wise. similar to microgrids that used by hospitals and other businesses.

    2. In California, the Kirkwood Mountain Resort near Lake Tahoe used a micro-utility to provide power to residents and tourists for years. But the electricity it produced sometimes cost up to 70 cents a kilowatt-hour, or three to five times the rates charged by larger utilities in the state. Eventually, the town of Kirkwood took over the utility and connected it to the state electric grid.

      interesting! would want to dig deeper into this

    3. The utopian visions of generating electricity where it is used have often run into maintenance and other problems. Many tiny utilities created under such models in the United States and Canada were later swallowed up by larger power companies.

      i would like more details on this "maintenance" problem before casting doubt on an entire program - especially given the relative business strength of Sunnova (not a fragile start up) and the technological progress made in recent years

  12. Sep 2022
    1. If you're trying to create a scene that sums up the energy landscape in Texas right now, you couldn't write anything better than this. We were standing next to a defunct coal plant that was now surrounded by what I remember to be, like, hundreds of wind turbines.

      This is perfect

    1. rather allow the market to determine the optimal number of parking spots needed in each project.

      i wonder how the "market" will determine optimal parking spots- if they can develop more apartments or buildings for rent wouldn't they do that than spend money developing spaces that are unpaid

    1. CAISO, which runs 80 percent of the state’s electric system, must depend on and compete with neighbors for what is sold in energy markets. That means California risks falling short during periods of peak demand, like the one it experienced on Sept. 6.

      this is true of every energy system

    2. has complicated energy operations, as an increasing share of electricity is coming from solar and wind farms that produce power only when the sun shines or the wind blows

      omg wow who knew such insight

    3. Where local utilities once produced, transmitted and delivered electricity to their customers, a cast of players now orchestrates the service in most areas of the country.

      they phrase this as if it is chaos, after a FINANCIAL TRADER QUOTE

    1. Russia's Gazprom said on Monday that it will ship 42.4 million cubic metres of natural gas to Europe via Ukraine, a volume unchanged from yesterday.

      difference here?

    1. Energy companies face steeper costs of production when dealing with new regulatory hurdles but are slower to factor in incentives in their investment decisions.

      need to dig into this more

    2. thanks to a haphazard transition to renewable energy, reduced investment in oil and gas production, political inaction and unexpected economic forces triggered by the pandemic and lockdowns.

      interesting conclusion.