supporters of the Gay International’s missionary tasks haveproduced two kinds of literature on the Muslim world: an academic literature ofhistorical, literary, and anthropological accounts, written mostly by white maleEuropean or American gay scholars, which purport to describe and explain“homosexuality” in the past and present of the Arab and Muslim worlds; andjournalistic accounts of the lives of so-called gays and (much less so) lesbians inthe contemporary Arab and Muslim worlds.3
This passage stood out to me because it shows Massad's central idea. It shows that he is not part of the LGTBQ+ community and that anyone who is part of this community should not be a part of the Arab culture. It shows how the Arab culture in the western countries is very different than from the United States where everyone is felt included. It shows that in the United States is very different than Western countries by the United States being a mix of countries and western countries being predomintely Arab.