1,493 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2018
    1. Our fellow citizens, too, who in proportion to their love of liberty keep a steady eye upon the means of sustaining it, do not require to be reminded of the duty they owe to themselves to remedy all essential defects in so vital a part of their system. While they are sensible that every evil attendant upon its operation is not necessarily indicative of a bad organization, but may proceed from temporary causes, yet the habitual presence, or even a single instance, of evils which can be clearly traced to an organic defect will not, I trust, be over-looked through a too scrupulous veneration for the work of their ancestors. The Constitution was an experiment committed to the virtue and intelligence of the great mass of our country-men, in whose ranks the framers of it themselves were to perform the part of patriotic observation and scrutiny, and if they have passed from the stage of existence with an increased confidence in its general adaptation to our condition we should learn from authority so high the duty of fortifying the points in it which time proves to be exposed rather than be deterred from approaching them by the suggestions of fear or the dictates of misplaced reverence.

      Jackson's argument for amending the Constitution. What's important to him (or anyone): the end goal (in this case, changing the VP election law) or the supporting logic (the Founders understood their imperfection and so provided ways to rectify structural problems).

  2. Nov 2017
  3. Oct 2017
    1. For more than 150 years, his body has been kept on public display in a glass case at University College London, however after a mummification mistake, his head was deemed too distasteful to show, and is now kept in safe where it is removed just once a year to check that skin and hair are not falling off.

      Comma Splice.

  4. Sep 2017
  5. Aug 2017
    1. Design gives us the room to rethink the semiotic activity with which we engage in our classrooms. Rhetoric and composition has been theorizing multimodality for over a half of century (see Jason Palmeri’s work on the history of multimodality in composition studies).

      The concept of designers = wonderful concept.

    2. Further, as the faculty who developed the Revisions course explained in our curricular materials, “an underlying strategy of the class is NOT to separate oral, written and visual communication, but rather to help students come to an understanding” that purposeful selection of mode and medium “always involves making rhetorical decisions” and requires “thoughtful and aware modification for particular audiences and circumstances”. In other words, our job was not to teach the discrete conventions of each mode, but to help students consider which modes were most appropriate in a given circumstance, how they might be integrated, and how they might be leveraged to achieve the desired impact on a target audience.

      This is great.

  6. Jul 2017

    Tags

    Annotators

  7. May 2017
    1. of annotated bibliographies, digital archives, commonplaces, rhetorical analysis, and most importantly worked on a mapping commonplace assignment.

      No links or explanation of the project?

    1. The author claims that Howard University is known for its homecoming even before the quality education. This highlights the behavior of the audience at the annual Yardfest hip hop show. The article goes on to

      Not using the template?

  8. Apr 2017
    1. chomburg Center. “Shiloh Baptist Church Records.” The New York Public Library. Accessed               February 19, 2017. https://www.nypl.org/sites/default/files/archivalcollections/pdf/shilohbaptist.pdf.

      Formatting. Period instead of comma after date is incorrect.

    1. Thomas circle. Williams outlines the birth of the area as a prestigious center for the city’s wealthy and carries it through until the 1980’s as the last of these homes was turned down and replaced with the hotels and office buildings that take up most of the space around the circle today. Williams also shows the change of the circle itself, whose traffic flow, shape and utility changed several times during the 1900’s.

      Note that you don't unpack his argument here or his aim. Strive to make a unified claim with this form. In short, your trying to make an argument about what the author is arguing, which culminates with something like "For Williams, then, these photos help him shape how . . ." or something like that. It's why it's so important to stick to that form: it forces us to make an argument.

    1. It so follows, Hegel explains, that labor is the work ofpossession, an act of the will to shape one’s surroundings: “to impose a form on a thing is the mode of taking possession” (Phil. Right, 47).

      labor brings consciousness.

    1. On the one hand, the coincidence be­tV11een for1nation and disappearance of form is diachronic: a past form cedes place to a new fonn, and one thus changes identity or "self" in the course of time. On tl1e other hand, the coincidence between for1nation and disappearance of for1n is synchronic: the threat of the explosion of form structurally inhabits every forn1

      Synchronic vs Diachronic

    2. The construction of the link to the object de1nands the formation of images, or "second-order maps," and thereafter of signs. In detail, the stages are the following: "the nonconscious neural signaling of an individual organ­ism begets the proto-self, which pennits core self and core consciousness, which allow for an autobiographical self, which permits extended consciousness. At the end of the chain, ex­tended consciousness permits conscience."1

      Developing consciousness.

    3. Malabou, Catherine. Perspectives in Continental Philosophy : What Should We Do with Our Brain?. US, US: Fordham University Press, 2008. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 10 April 2017.Copyright © 2008. Fordham University Press. All rights reserved. proto-self is thus primarily a form of organic representation of the organism itself that maintains its coherence:

      Proto-self

    4. It is the V11eakest because the certainty of the continuity betV11een the neuronal and the mental can obviously never be a strictly scientific postulate. It necessarily constitutes a philosophical or epistemological position and such positions are not al­V11ays clearly articulated.

      Can't be proven.

    1. How inexplicable are these facts on the ordinary view of creation! Why should the brain be enclosed in a box composed of such numerous and such extraordinarily shaped pieces of bone? As Owen has remarked, the benefit derived from the yielding of the separate pieces in the act of parturition of mammals, will by no means explain the same construction in the skulls of birds. Why should similar bones have been created in the formation of the wing and leg of a bat, used as they are for such totally different purposes? Why should one crustacean, which has an extremely complex mouth formed of many parts, consequently always have fewer legs; or conversely, those with many legs have simpler mouths? Why should the sepals, petals, stamens, and pistils in any individual flower, though fitted for such widely different purposes, be all constructed on the same pattern ?

      Reminds me of Thoreau:

      We might try our lives by a thousand simple tests; as, for instance, that the same sun which ripens my beans illumines at once a system of earths like ours. If I had remembered this it would have prevented some mistakes. This was not the light in which I hoed them. The stars are the apexes of what wonderful triangles! What distant and different beings in the various mansions of the universe are contemplating the same one at the same moment! Nature and human life are as various as our several constitutions. Who shall say what prospect life offers to another? Could a greater miracle take place than for us to look through each other's eyes for an instant? We should live in all the ages of the world in an hour; ay, in all the worlds of the ages. History, Poetry, Mythology!—I know of no reading of another's experience so startling and informing as this would be. The greater part of what my neighbors call good I believe in my soul to be bad, and if I repent of anything, it is very likely to be my good behavior. What demon possessed me that I behaved so well? You may say the wisest thing you can, old man—you who have lived seventy years, not without honor of a kind—I hear an irresistible voice which invites me away from all that. One generation abandons the enterprises of another like stranded vessels.

    2. If it could be proved that the Hottentot had descended from the Negro, I think he would be classed under the Negro group, however much he might differ in colour and other important characters from negroes.

      He removes this later.

    3. Finally, with respect to the comparative value of the various groups of species, such as orders, sub-orders, families, sub-families, and genera, they seem to be, at least at present, almost arbitrary. Several of the best botanists, such as Mr Bentham and others, have strongly insisted on their arbitrary value. Instances could be given amongst plants and insects, of a group of forms, first ranked by practised naturalists as only a genus, and then raised to the rank of a sub-family or family; and this has been done, not because further research has detected important structural differences, at first overlooked, but because numerous allied species, with slightly different grades of difference, have been subsequently discovered.

      Read by Tamashasky: "Getting away from making flat assertions by defending your claims."

    1. We might try our lives by a thousand simple tests; as, for instance, that the same sun which ripens my beans illumines at once a system of earths like ours. If I had remembered this it would have prevented some mistakes. This was not the light in which I hoed them. The stars are the apexes of what wonderful triangles! What distant and different beings in the various mansions of the universe are contemplating the same one at the same moment! Nature and human life are as various as our several constitutions. Who shall say what prospect life offers to another? Could a greater miracle take place than for us to look through each other's eyes for an instant? We should live in all the ages of the world in an hour; ay, in all the worlds of the ages. History, Poetry, Mythology!—I know of no reading of another's experience so startling and informing as this would be. The greater part of what my neighbors call good I believe in my soul to be bad, and if I repent of anything, it is very likely to be my good behavior. What demon possessed me that I behaved so well? You may say the wisest thing you can, old man—you who have lived seventy years, not without honor of a kind—I hear an irresistible voice which invites me away from all that. One generation abandons the enterprises of another like stranded vessels.

      Reminds me of Darwin:

      How inexplicable are these facts on the ordinary view of creation! Why should the brain be enclosed in a box composed of such numerous and such extraordinarily shaped pieces of bone? As Owen has remarked, the benefit derived from the yielding of the separate pieces in the act of parturition of mammals, will by no means explain the same construction in the skulls of birds. Why should similar bones have been created in the formation of the wing and leg of a bat, used as they are for such totally different purposes? Why should one crustacean, which has an extremely complex mouth formed of many parts, consequently always have fewer legs; or conversely, those with many legs have simpler mouths? Why should the sepals, petals, stamens, and pistils in any individual flower, though fitted for such widely different purposes, be all constructed on the same pattern ?

  9. Mar 2017
    1. The District of Columbia Office of Planning (OP) manages the development of the District of Columbia by preserving and revitalizing characteristic neighborhoods such as, Dupont Circle (District of Columbia Office of Planning, “About the DC Office of Planning | Mission”)

      Begin with a controversy or a point of view.

  10. inst-fs-dub-prod.inscloudgate.net inst-fs-dub-prod.inscloudgate.net
    1. It follows, then, that when one interpretation wins out over another, it is not because the first has been shown to be in accordance with the facts but because it is from the perspective of its assumptions that the facts are now being specified. It is these assumptions, and not the facts they make possible, that are at stake in any critical dispute.

      Bingo

    2. Nor can this be just any old deficiency; it will not do, for example, to fault your predecessors for failing to notice that a poem is free of split infinitives or dangling participles.

      Unless, of course, you're in a community who cares about such things?

    3. The lack an interpretation supplies must be related to the criteria by which the literary community recog­nizes and evaluates the objects of its professional attention.

      What Graff calls the "So What?"

    4. Rhetorically the new position announces itself as a break from the old, but in fact it is radically dependent on the old, because it is only in the context of some differential relationship that it can be perceived as new or, for that matter, perceived at all.

      Relationships create meaning. Network / Systems theory?

    5. (students always know what they are ex­pected to believe)

      They always know there's a game and no matter how much I try to break out of this game, construct ways to break these bounds, I am still constrained by the situation. I've merely changed the rules of the game.

    6. The Eskimo reading is unaccepta­ble because there is at present no interpretive strategy for pro­ducing it, no way of "looking" or reading (and remember, all acts of looking or reading are "ways") that would result in the emergence of obviously Eskiri:lO meanings. This does not mean, however, that no such strategy could ever come into play, and it is not difficult to imagine the circumstances under which it would establish itself.

      And this is the point.

    1. ccording to Dobrin, without theory, "composition scholarship will stagnate, and composition as a field will be defined within the narrow confines of a service orientation" (23). We risk invisibility and illegiti macy, and those attributes would have dire consequences for the field as a whole.

      True.

    1. rather, he doesn't like it because he thinks it makes claims for benefits that cannot be scientifically substantiated and so leaves academe open to all sorts of meddling criticism

      But that's not all, right? I'm thinking in terms of Hawk, though Fish doesn't go so far. More specifically, Hawk says the only to teach such values is to give students opportunity to discover it on their own, right?

    2. an a sentence. Indeed, by characterizing my field as "composition studies" only, Fish leaves out a major part of what we do: addressing not only the structure of language but also the rhetorical means of persuasion

      Not any longer.

    Annotators

    Annotators

  11. Feb 2017
    1. Translated into pedagogy, this belief typically results in some version of current-traditionalism. And despite some novel elements, Fish’s approach to writing instruction is indeed current-traditional, within a belletristic conception of English as the refined appreciation of literature.

      Argument

    1. In Greek thought there are two ways of viewing time: Chronos and Kairos. Chronos Time is chronological and measurable. Kairos Time is more open-ended and expansive such that one can experience an “eternity” in a brief instant. It is not a cold finality at all. While we mainly live in Chronos Time, it is possible to experience Kairos as a place in which to abide and to breathe deeply without respect to calendars and deadlines. Too often we live only for the clock and fail to notice how, in the absence of incremental time, we would be more able to see the pattern in the rug, how the stained glass windows of our lives make sense as wholes and not as mere pieces.

      This paragraph.

    1. aims to connect the history of inequality of the residents of Cabrini Greens, a poor public housing project in Chicago, to a series of issues with the built environment of the neighborhood that limit the economic, political, and social utility of the residents.

      Strong first sentence!

    1. And cities were constructed in ways—including by erecting physical barriers—that made it very difficult for people from one side of town to access the othe

      Bingo: her main thing.

    1. As a result, President Trump almost certainly began violating the Constitution the moment he took the oath of office.

      We've seen how fragile our traditions are. It's up to the polis and the other branches and his own party to uphold them. It seems like now, however, the Republicans are selling out.

    1. The Russian dissident and chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov drew upon long familiarity with that process when he tweeted: “The point of modern propaganda isn’t only to misinform or push an agenda. It is to exhaust your critical thinking, to annihilate truth.”

      Very well said.

  12. Jan 2017
    1. Architectural Exclusion: Discrimination and Segregation Through Physical Design of the Built Environment

      You made it! Now toggle from Public to WRTG 101.

    1. “It was a huge crowd, a magnificent crowd. I haven’t seen such a crowd as big as this,” Mr. Hoyer told CNN, quoting Mr. Trump. He added that Mr. Trump did not “spend a lot of time on that, but it was clear that it was still on his mind.”

      Whoa.

    1. January 20th, 2017 will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again.

      How so? And how weren't we before? Are you going to give us back our property you are profiting from?

    2. Today's ceremony, however, has very special meaning because today, we are not merely transferring power from one administration to another or from one party to another, but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the people.

      Empty language. What does this even mean? How is he "transferring power to" us?

    1. To point out and decry rac-ism (or any other social ill) is not the same as adopting a truly public subjec-tivity. Ironically enough, it may be a way to write oneself outside the scene of public rhetorical action. To simply call for an end to racism (or an end to any other public crisis) risks closing the line of intervention too soon. We leave no space to consider the multiple networks across which this crisis is embedded, and through which we may rework the relations of power.
    2. Rather than continuing to think of themselves only as subjects who relate through feeling, I hope that the class also gave them some opportunity to think of themselves as subjects who re-late through question, investigation, and inquiry.

      My goal, too.

    3. Their method almost perfectly mirrors Benjamin's method in the Ar-cades Project, which theorizes the streets as "the dwelling place of the collec-tive," which is "an eternally unquiet, eternally agitated being."

      Refusing to close down meaning.

    1. But I wanted to tell a story in which the company was us—both in its making and its propagating and in its perpetuation through consumers. We are all the machine. We are all the Octopus.

      Bingo

    2. It’s a way in which literature can go beyond science. It’s a tremendous moment to be alive when it comes to new myths, new stories, new configurations for understanding who we are.

      Finally! The defense! Literature makes the story . . .

    3. And if you can hold those two somehow concurrently in mind—the belief in the representation as the thing it represents, and also awareness of the representation as mere representation—then you get closer to the fundamental paradox of consciousness.

      Fiction as reality?

    4. The funny thing is that they would never launch that criticism about believability of character against a novel that is clearly written on the terms of noncharacter-driven, nonevent-driven, postmodern metafiction.

      Referring to Wallace here?

    5. I had an insight at the beginning of the book into how completely stripped of reflective capability modern life can be. And it was great to realize how strong my memory could get when I deprived myself of firsthand research information. This book was really written in the absence of reference materials.

      Certainly true.

    1. The thing that makes reading and writing suspect in the eyes of the market economy is that it’s not corrupted. It’s a threat to the GNP, to the gene engineer. It’s an invisible, sedate, almost inert process. Reading is the last act of secular prayer.
  13. Dec 2016
    1. Sometimes opinions must be forgotten in order to make the most beneficial decision within a situation.

      That's a keeper of a line right there, Will.

    1. In the seventh chapter of his book, City of Rhetoric, David Fleming exposes the disconnect between those living in the Cabrini Green homes and those financially stable enough to live outside the housing project.

      Strong first sentence. You've got the hang of this.

    1. that interior designers and architects should set out to create non-gendered spaces that will better accommodate the evolution of traditional gender roles and identities that is happening in today’s society.

      Bam! Fantastic.

    1. “Because you don’t come up with the right answer if everyone at the table looks the same and thinks the same and has the same experience – you never come up with the best answer. So when you get these seats at these tables of power, your obligation is to make sure the conversation is diverse.”

      Well said.

    1. Ambassador John Bolton claimed Sunday that hacks during the election season could have been "a false flag" operation — possibly committed by the Obama administration itself. In an interview with Fox News' Eric Shawn, Bolton questioned why FBI Director James Comey said during the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private server, there was no direct evidence found of foreign intelligence service penetration, but cyber fingerprints were found in regards to the presidential election.

      These guys have gone of the deep end

    1. But Sean Spicer, the RNC’s chief strategist and communications director, admonished the Times for what he said was simply false reporting and insisted the RNC had not been hacked. “The intelligence is wrong,” he said in a CNN interview Saturday morning. “It didn’t happen. We offered The New York Times conclusive proof that it didn’t happen. They refused to look at that. They ignored it because it didn’t fit the narrative.” He then accused intelligence officials of pushing the story for political purposes. “I believe that there are people within these agencies that are upset with the election and are pushing a personal agenda,” Spicer said.

      3 on the FP Dictator watch list: politicizing the civil service

    1. Western sanctions against Russia prohibiting the nation from certain energy development activities have slowed Exxon Mobil’s investments, particularly a joint venture with Rosneft that was supposed to start drilling for oil in the Kara Sea in 2014. Mr. Tillerson has spoken out against sanctions, in part because Exxon Mobil is unable to collect revenues from an investment in an oil and gas consortium it belongs to that operates off Sakhalin Island.

      And this is why he's getting the job.

    1. There has been ferment among the literati since Bob Dylan was awarded the Nobel Prize in literature. Many say that however well Dylan does what he does, it is not literature. Dylan did not go to Stockholm on Saturday to collect his prize, which the Swedish Academy says was awarded “for having created new poetic expressions within the great American song tradition.”
    1. A crude, quick and flippant assessment is what he deserves. He is semi-fascist: more fascist than any successful American politician yet, and the most dangerous threat to pluralist democracy in this country in more than a century, but — thank our stars — an amateurish imitation of the real thing.

      Let's hope this holds up.

    1. In fact, half of President Barack Obama’s targets for greenhouse gas cuts are tied to DOE’s rulemakings on efficiency standards for appliances like water heaters and air-conditioners.The questionnaire also asks for the agency to identify which office "owns" the work on international "Clean Energy Ministerials," a program that helps connect the public and private sectors across several governments, and "Mission Innovation," a multinational effort to develop clean energy technology.

      That's because the Republican-controlled Congress effectively stopped working with Obama after the 2010 midterms.

    1. Citing high cost, Trump says Boeing’s contract to build Air Force One should be canceled

      Trump's tweet came just 22 minutes after the Chicago Tribune published comments by Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg, who said he worried that Trump's promises of a more protectionist trade policy could hurt his company, which does robust business with China. Muilenburg told the Tribune that he would urge the president-elect to take a warmer stance toward the kinds of trade deals he railed against on the campaign trail, warning, "If we do not lead when it comes to writing these rules, our competitors will write them for us.

      From Politico, who themselves buried this way down.

    1. Trump's tweet came just 22 minutes after the Chicago Tribune published comments by Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg, who said he worried that Trump's promises of a more protectionist trade policy could hurt his company, which does robust business with China. Muilenburg told the Tribune that he would urge the president-elect to take a warmer stance toward the kinds of trade deals he railed against on the campaign trail, warning, "If we do not lead when it comes to writing these rules, our competitors will write them for us."

      This is so dangerous, and why isn't this the biggest story of the day?

    1. “I’m just an immigrant running a pizza place trying to make ends meet,” said Hammad, a Muslim — and Donald Trump voter — who moved here from Egypt in 1980 and first opened a pizza joint on Connecticut Avenue 25 years ago.

      I'm not buying this. Surely, he's saying this as a protective measure?

    1. Fifty years after the creation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development — and nearly that long after the passage of the Fair Housing Act of 1968 — the fight against the interlinked scourges of housing discrimination and racial segregation in America is far from finished. Economic isolation is actually growing worse across the country, as more and more minority families find themselves trapped in high-poverty neighborhoods without decent housing, schools or jobs, and with few avenues of escape.This did not happen by accident.
    2. Fifty years after the creation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development — and nearly that long after the passage of the Fair Housing Act of 1968 — the fight against the interlinked scourges of housing discrimination and racial segregation in America is far from finished.

      First Sentence

    1. "There are a lot of business people who go around purporting to be speaking on behalf of the U.S. government or friends in government and it is hard to prevent that. The problem is that when they are the president's kids, this can be taken seriously," Painter wrote in an email. "There is a big risk that anyone discussing Trump business and U.S. government business in the same conversation or with the same people could be accused of offering or soliciting a bribe — e.g. 'I want you to do this for the Trump organization — and I can get the US government to do this for you.' That could be a criminal offense. "This is one reason the president should sell the business holdings," Painter added. 'It is critical that anyone working for these companies not engage in the types of conversations I describe above."

      I think this is what brings Trump down.

    1. In Silicon Valley, where I live, the word “disruption” has an overwhelmingly positive valence: Thousands of smart, young people arrive here every year hoping to disrupt established ways of doing business — and become very rich in the process.For almost everyone else, however, disruption is a bad thing.
    1. recalling that the U.S. military strategy in Afghanistan included spreading false information through the media to see how it might affect the enemy.

      Can't be difficult!

    2. that Clinton’s campaign manager takes part in occult rituals where bodily fluids are consumed.

      This is very much part of the Comet conspiracy these fools terrorist traffic.

    3. Flynn, who has 106,000 Twitter followers, has used the platform to retweet accusations that Clinton is involved with child sex trafficking and has "secretly waged war” on the Catholic Church, as well as charges that Obama is a “jihadi” who “laundered” money for Muslim terrorists.

      How is this NOT disqualifying?