Regardless of the reason, if we as scientists choose which studies to believe and which to ignore on the basis of personal preconceptions rather than scientific merit, how much easier will it be for practitioners to do the same, leading them to reject future scientific advances in psychology and criminal justice?
I like this. I just read a blurb about how scientist who have used psychedelic drugs and study said drugs are viewed with less credibility regardless of the quality of work they've done. Not only do confirmation bias', preconception, and personal bias's affect everyday happenings and people, they affect the data and research we use to learn more. In todays society it feels like personal affirmation is more important that objective reality and truth, which is a concerning trend