13 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2022
    1. And the money will circulate among ourselves, the goods being entirely of our own growth and manufacture

      doesn't specify who "ourselves" includes, may be social commentary

    2. the mother will have eight shillings net profit, and be fit for work till she produces another child.

      interesting characterization of familial relations

    3. the poor innocent babes I doubt more to avoid the expense than the shame, which would move tears and pity in the most savage and inhuman breast.

      ironic because of the argument he's making about eating babies

    4. would deserve so well of the public as to have his statue set up for a preserver of the nation

      funny and use of foreshadowing within his own piece

    5. who as they grow up either turn thieves for want of work, or leave their dear native country to fight for the Pretender in Spain, or sell themselves to the Barbadoes.

      very polarizing and specific language that hooks the reader

  2. Oct 2022
    1. One could certainly live without the culture industry, therefore it necessarily creates too much satiation and apathy. In itself, it has few resources itself to correct this. Advertising is its elixir of life. But as its product never fails to reduce to a mere promise the enjoyment which it promises as a commodity, it eventually coincides with publicity, which it needs because it cannot be enjoyed.

      This is how I feel about social media. No one really needs it, but most people feel the need to keep it. It's also the same idea of advertising and capitalizing on people's interests (just like the arts). "Elixir of life" is a really cool way to talk about a dependency.

    2. Amusement under late capitalism is the prolongation of work.

      Such an interesting way to talk about entertainment. Amusement makes it seem so trivial and almost childish. Also talking about amusement in relation to capitalism and work is an interesting thing.

    3. Instead of exposing itself to this failure in which the style of the great work of art has always achieved self-negation, the inferior work has always relied on its similarity with others – on a surrogate identity.

      I love this idea of industries not finding solutions but instead taking backroads. I guess this happens in a lot of different industries, but it is a bit disappointing that it's so prevalent in the arts.

    4. Producers have done it for him. Art for the masses has destroyed the dream but still conforms to the tenets of that dreaming idealism which critical idealism baulked at. Everything derives from consciousness: for Malebranche and Berkeley, from the consciousness of God; in mass art, from the consciousness of the production team. Not only are the hit songs, stars, and soap operas cyclically recurrent and rigidly invariable types, but the specific content of the entertainment itself is derived from them and only appears to change. The details are interchangeable. The short interval sequence which was effective in a hit song, the hero’s momentary fall from grace (which he accepts as good sport), the rough treatment which the beloved gets from the male star, the latter’s rugged defiance of the spoilt heiress, are, like all the other details, ready-made clichés to be slotted in anywhere; they never do anything more than fulfil the purpose allotted them in the overall plan.

      This is similar to McCarthy's idea of authors and how much they engineer their narratives. Now that I think about it, a lot of pop songs sound similar and almost as if they follow an equation. I think once an artistic realm is developed enough, there are certain things that have already been done.

    5. Movies and radio need no longer pretend to be art. The truth that they are just business is made into an ideology in order to justify the rubbish they deliberately produce. They call themselves industries; and when their directors’ incomes are published, any doubt about the social utility of the finished products is removed.

      It's interesting how something as freeform and artistic can be monetized and turned into an industry. If anything, the arts can be monetized even more under the guise of being progressive.