Can make up if absent, in-class/group work

because we can do anytime, no absence leinency

Given in lab sections, 3 midterms, no final

Can do any time

Wednesday before thanksgiving, no class. Instead do service learning assignments, two volunteer shifts or one shift and an on-camous event

See "career exploration" in assignments

Due dates will vary by team, each team will teach their topic, so be preapered to teach. I'm team 1, so my team will go first

Prepare for the team teach/case discussion Multiple right answers, just show thoughts. Due next week

Meet with prof a few days before team teach to make sure we're on the right track

Can skip two or do all, HW is for practice

Excel is also allowed during exams, we will turn in the excell sheets so no cheating, but only graded on the paper exam we turn in. advised to put frameworks and formulas on cheat sheet, not practice problems

3 chunks of class, cost and analysis

I'm group 1, so Porter's 5 forces

the fragmentation of a larger political entity (like a country or region) into smaller, often hostile or mutually antagonistic units

oh there it is

Hmm I wonder

haha, yeah

"White people in America are lucky that Black people are looking for equality, and not revenge." -TikTok I think

So many clothes are made in Bangladesh and Vietnam (so many sweatshops)

this is still going on - (book) Material World talks about a river that's still being dredged for sand and it's ruining the ecosystem, including the farmers

pseudonym for war

graphic

Everyone celebrated when United Health's CEO got 86ed

Substitution was not done in good faith, so substantial performance was not done

Performance does NOT vary greatly, pipes were similar

Not done in good faith, builder did not tell the client about the reduced price and pocketed the difference

Was this done in good faith and does it vary greatly from what was promised?

This is not unreasonable - webster could purchase and resell the wipers from another manufacturer

The seller is unable to perform due to unforeseen events

buyer doesn't need the stuff anymore due to unforeseen events

The sons offer to pay and don't give the father a chance to pay - so this is not a case of sureity, the sons are the primary in the contract. Statute of Frauds doesn't apply.

She accepts their services, which implies she accepts their offer.

no capacity = no contract (no promissory estoppel because she didn't make any promises)

so check quasi-contract, fairness requires compensation

the court sets the price instead of the parties under quasi-contract (at the amount the court deems fair)

No consideration (B isn't getting anything from A, just gives them a promise) so no contract. It's not reasonable for A to rely on B's promise, because B could sell her house and someone else could build. Best answer - not reasonable.

Two weeks from today!!!

log in to zoom and canvas - questions are on canvas and zoom is for asking questions

Exams are online!

Final is NOT cumulative, but the approach is cheat sheet allowed - one 3x5 notecard

NOT cumulative can use notecard from exam 1 and a new notecard for cheatsheets

NOT cumulative

IRAC = Issue - as a question, use legal terms Rule - what was the ruling for each part of the decision Analysis - why did it get ruled that way? What elements are present? Conclusion - we put the judges robe on ourselves and decide

For our cases we need to communicate clearly - know your audience

Best way to get in touch with Prof

partners will answer questions together

we learn things by working together

The Law is rarely black and white - many shades of gray

I forgot my notebook on day 1 of class so the notes are here in hypothesis

Tricks for MC Qs: know the basic law, and look for keywords to know the facts of the case