5 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2023
    1. Lateral reading is a strategy that enables people to emulate how professional fact checkers establish the credibility of online information. It involves opening up new browser tabs to search for information about the organisation or individual behind a site before diving into its contents. Only after consulting the open web do skilled searchers gauge whether expending attention is worth it. Before critical thinking can begin, the first step is to ignore the lure of the site and check out what others say about its alleged factual reports.

      I've employed Lateral Reading in political arguments with friends and family since 2009. I never called it this however, so it's good to know theres a word for it.

    2. Critical ignoring is the ability to choose what to ignore and where to invest one’s limited attentional capacities. Critical ignoring is more than just not paying attention – it’s about practising mindful and healthy habits in the face of information overabundance.

      To go further on my previous point inquiring "Why is it bad that we are spending less time on individual Twitter hashtags?" I would also pose the following question: "Wouldn't critical ignoring imply that we would spend less time on a multitude of inane or unimportant Twitter hashtags?"

      I agree with the concept of critical ignoring, but when it comes to data regarding our collective attention spans, I believe it may skew things somewhat.

    3. A 2019 analysis of Twitter hashtags, Google queries, or Reddit comments found that across the past decade, the rate at which the popularity of items rises and drops has accelerated. In 2013, for example, a hashtag on Twitter was popular on average for 17.5 hours, while in 2016, its popularity faded away after 11.9 hours. More competition leads to shorter collective attention intervals, which lead to ever fiercer competition for our attention – a vicious circle.

      The ramifications of this aren't discussed in very great detail. Why is it bad that hashtags are only popular for 11.9 hours instead of 17.5 hours? One could make assumptions, but I would want to see real data on how this affects people and society. My perspective is that these shifts in attention span are causing us to focus less on individual instances and stories of specific crises (climate change, COVID pandemic, income inequality, mass shootings, etc.) but that overall more time is spent on these concepts as a whole.

  2. Aug 2023
    1. The social media landscape continues to evolve dramatically, with new social networks like TikTok entering the field as well as existing platforms like Instagram and Telegram gaining markedly in popularity among young audiences. As social natives shift their attention away from Facebook (or in many cases never really start using it), more visually focused platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube have become increasingly popular for news among this group. Use of TikTok for news has increased fivefold among 18–24s across all markets over just three years, from 3% in 2020 to 15% in 2022, while YouTube is increasingly popular among young people in Eastern Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America.

      Of course, tracking 18-24 year olds is important because it might show trends and where things are headed better than other age brackets, but I would be curious to know where my generation sits with some of these social medias. Many of them do not surprise me. Twitter/X is in a downward spiral. Facebook has been stagnating and Instagram seems to be on a steady upward trajectory, while Tik Tok is skyrocketing. I would say YouTube surprises me most as it seems to be trending downward.

    2. Since the Digital News Report began tracking respondents’ main source of news, social networks have steadily replaced news websites as a primary source for younger audiences overall, with 39% of social natives (18–24s) across 12 markets now using social media as their main source of news, compared with 34% who prefer to go direct to a news website or app. We also find that social natives are far more likely to access news using ‘side-door’ sources such as social media, aggregator sites, and search engines than older groups.

      What I find particularly interesting about the "Proportion of 18-24s who say each is their main source of news" graph, is that since 2019, news sites and social media have swapped places every year. It is not immediately clear which is going to come out on top in the end. This seems to be a larger question about how much we trust each source (news media vs social media). For now I think its a wash, as the data would suggest news will be on top again within the next year. There are advantages and disadvantages to each of course, with social media being free and allowing users to be part of the conversation, and news media often attempting for journalistic integrity.