2 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2022
    1. My name, my face, my story have effectively entered the public imagination. I am legally considered a public figure, and that leaves me little recourse to combat depictions of me that are harmful and untrue, and gives carte blanche to anyone who wants to write about me to do so without consulting me in any way.

      This is a perfect example of how media outlets can put out their idea of the "truth" of a story without knowing all the facts. Posting about peoples livelihood without knowing every detail is reckless and can be extremely detrimental to someone's character and image. Amanda Knox is just one example of many people whom have been falsely reported on. It's irresponsible to write about someone if you are not completely aware of the story through all angles. It's evident that many outlets were just "piggy backing" off on one another and simply just trying to hook new consumers and gain traffic.

    2. From the moment I was arrested, my name and face and trauma became a source of profit for news organizations, filmmakers, and other artists, scrupulous and unscrupulous.

      Unfortunately this happens far too often with media outlets. News platforms want to just put out a strong article with strong headlines in order to catch the attention of consumers. It's evident that not all the facts were aware and media outlets were only putting out one sided stories. Without all the facts out there, people will form opinions without knowing every detail that may have gone in the story as whole. This unfortunately was extremely detrimental towards Amanda Know's image.