94 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2024
    1. Considering that many local marine species, including wild Pacific salmon, experience adverse effects at oxygen concentrations much higher than the hypoxic threshold, we note that 50 to 100% of the upper 50 m of Herbert Inlet consistently presented low oxygen concentrations (defined here as a guideline as ≤ 4.9 mL L-1 or 6.9 mg L-1)

      Here is a time they mention salmon thresholds

  2. Jan 2024
    1. Exercise 2.6Define an RV from the outcome of soil moisture measurements in the range of 20–100% in vol-ume. Give an example of an event. Assuming that it can take values in [20,100] uniformly, plot thepdf and cdf. Calculate the mean and variance.Exercise 2.7At a site, the monthly air temperature is normally distributed. It averages to 20°C with a standarddeviation of 4°C. What is the probability that the value of the air temperature in a given monthexceeds 24°C? What is the probability that it is below 16°C or above 24°C?The exponential pdf is given byp x a ax( ) exp( )= − (2.34)and the cdf is given byF x ax( ) exp( )= − −1 (2.35)It has mean and variance equal to σX Xa a= =1 12 2/ /and , respectively.–40.00.2p(Z)0.4–2 0Z2 4–z0 z00.00.4F(Z)0.8–4 –2 0Z2 4–z0 z0FIGURE 2.13 Standard normal pdf and cdf.

      Work through these later cause I'm lost

    2. As another example, consider an RV normally distributed with mean = 1 and variance = 0.25.What is the probability of obtaining a value in between 0.5 and 1.5? The standard deviation is 0.5. Thisinterval is one standard deviation away from the mean on each side. Therefore, the probability is 0.68

      Lost.

    3. Another way of looking at this is to think of the pdf as a theoretical model expressing the under-lying probability structure of the RV. These functions allow for the calculation of the moments.However, the statistics are calculated from the observed data and are used to estimate the moments.

      Would've been so much easier if they started with this explanation.

    4. This is the same as the mean of X

      Mean because this is not based off a dataset and is therefore an assumption that there is equal chance of all values in the possible range. How do you do this if the range of possible values is weighted to one side or the other?

    5. d dX / t aX= is a dynamic model. In this case, it is given by an ODE.• X(t) is the state variable at time t. In this case, the state could also be called the output. Inother cases, the output is a function of the state.• a is a parameter.• X(t0) is the initial condition or initial state (technically it is also a parameter

      Model terminology

    6. Assume that t1 = t and t0 = 0. Write the solution for the ODE of the example immediately above,using the initial condition X(0) = 1

      1/a(X(t)-X(0))=t-0 1/a(x(t)-1))=t at=x(t)-1 x(t)= at+1

    7. Assume that a = b = 1 for the term in Equation 2.2. What is the area under the curve betweent = 2 and t = 6? Illustrate the area using a graph like the one given in Figure 2.6

      1/7 (6^2- 2^2) 1/7(36-4) 1/7(32) =4.57

    8. Assume that a = 1 and b = 2. Evaluate the derivative of X with respect to t for the X given inEquation 2.2 and plot it. Is the derivative a constant with respect to t? Is the derivative a linearfunction with respect to t

      12t^2-1 =2t^1 =2t The derivative is a constant with respect to t

    9. This derivative represents a rate of change of X

      Yes, yes I remember this. If you want to see how the slope of a population changes over time with respect to time, you'd take the derivative.

    10. Use a variable X to denote human population on Earth. Explain why it varies and give an exampleof a value.

      It varies because people are constantly dying and giving birth so the value is in constant flux. Ex: x=7.86-7.88 billion

    Annotators

    1. Furthermore, for those that hold thisschema, any deviation from the path(experiments that don’t work, studentsthat become depressed, etc.

      Yeah...we are humans. Not machines.

    2. t is remarkable that listening to our ownidiosyncratic voice leads to better science.It makes research self-motivated and theroutine of research more rewarding

      Hmmmm. I am conflicted. On the one hand, I agree. I want to be free to pursue the questions I want to pursue. On the other, I recognize that the science I do will highly impact others and their voices and opinions are sometimes more important than my own ambitions. I want my research to be at the intersection of my interests AND the interests of First Nations and Tribes that I work with. I would not do a project that they do not want to happen, obviously.

    3. Do not committo a problem before 3 months haveelapsed

      Wow, wouldn't that be nice. But the reality is most of us cannot do that for financial reasons or are not allowed to do that because of working culture

    4. Pareto front as a function of the life stagesof the scientist

      And your goals as a scientist. This progression might look very different for scientists outside of academia, and even more different for restoration or consulting scientists.

    5. We generally value science that venturesdeep into unknown waters.

      Doesn't this exclude monitoring work, which isn't novel per say but does keep up to date knowledge on something we already know. This is VITAL for setting catch limits, restoration goals, etc. even if it isn't as new as other projects

    Annotators

    1. been turned down multiple times by NIH’speer-review system

      Sounds like we should change NIH (by creating a scientific culture that values innovation and takes chances on new stuff, NOT by putting DOD on a pedestal).

    2. DOD’s can-do approach, its enthusiasm about partnering withpatient-advocates, and its dedication to solving the problem of breastcancer

      Woahhhhhhhhh DOD lover alert

    3. including excessive bureau-cratic growth, interference from Congress, and long-term commitmentsto hugely expensive and troubled weapons systems with little civilianspillover potential, such as missile defense and the F-35 joint strikefighter — the Pentagon’s creativity and productivity as an innovator hassignificantly dissipated

      Okay, I see their point now. But we aren't in a time of war, or shouldn't be. Why should we commit so much to war inventions hoping that they'll spill over to the real world?

    4. he Boeing Company could take the jet-engine-powered aerialfuel tanker it was developing for the Air Force and use a similar designfor its 707 passenger jet,

      Boeing has wasted millions of dollars on dumb mistakes because of bureaucracy. Can we PLEASE stop PUTTING THESE PLACES ON A PEDESTAL. They weren't efficient in their experiments. They weren't maticulus. They threw everything they had at a wall over and over and over again until it worked. In other, non-governmental, exploratory science, we have moved more slowly because we have to do it right quickly or it won't be funded again because the discoveries are less valued than ones of WAR.

    5. But DOD also supported the science needed to keepinnovation going

      DOD uses the cheapest, worst materials and still regularly uses technology from the 1990s. They just make their PEOPLE, the people they OWN adapt. Let's not put it on a pedestal.

    6. but when it is steered to solve problems — especially thoserelated to technological innovation

      I agree with the first half, but not with the second. Tech has been so successful because it supported the idea of the world people already had. Some other sectors of innovation--such as conservation-- have been less successful not because their advances weren't as large, but because they were not allowed to be employed.

    7. but only scientists couldevaluate the research they were doing

      I mean, true, but I can't evaluate the work my surgeon is doing, or my vet, or many other professions that profoundly impact my life. Also: that is a function of how we have made science. I hate the flowery, unnecessary language we use in scientific papers that is pushed by the old generation of colonially trained scientists.

    Annotators

    1. er a malaria-infested swamp or theverted to an intens

      I see where this person's preference lies. You don't think INFESTED has a negative connotation? Sounds like this person is just upset that new science is challenging their opinions and worldview.

    2. , the decisi

      That's true. We should include the whole picture (as much as we can), but that doesn't mean we should do it to show that "it's all good, man. Look the invasive species are taking over and killing everything but it's all good"

    3. mans are inherently good, or at leaspreferable to ecosystems altered by h

      Not true. Many scientific experiments weigh the cost/benefit to stakeholders. TRADITIONAL, very colonial conservation science believes in untouched land, otherwise called "pure" conservation. Many others recognize humans as part of the system.

    4. ly, scientists have an obligation to avoid convey-ing overtly or covertly any policy pre

      slippery slope. That means we can't share our opinions online or anywhere in our life. That means we have less rights than everyone else.

    5. : Should the decline of the bird popu-lation be reversed

      In certain cultures that would not be a question. It would be a fact. They should. Or they shouldn't. In the colonial world, it is a question. Your worldview is showing.

    6. 3). Policy-neutral science strives to describe the worldacc

      Yeah well accurate to you is not accurate to someone else. For example, if you believe that qualitative information doesn't count, you may believe fish were never in a specific location while if I believe my elder's stories count in science, then your "accurate" world would not match mine.

    7. communicate

      Okay. Sounds like we should just disclose that about ourselves. BUT that ALSO means people in the "norm" have to learn to disclose that about themselves to because that is not a neutral stance. Ex: being Canadian, doing science to inform traditional Canadian politics is not neutral if you believe an American doing science to inform Canadian policies is not neutral.

    8. hat appears to su

      Then challenge the methods in those conversations. Everyone has policy opinions and every scientific experiment sets out to test something. I think it is fine for scientists to purposefully do science which tests their personal opinions. In fact, we often do, whether we admit it or not.

    9. Most of today's ecological policy issues are politically con-tentious

      So is every other field. Ex: within the medical field there are insurance policies which prevent people from accessing care and many doctors speak out against them. Should they also remove humanity from their work? I think the human element is also an important piece in science. Everyone impacted by a policy, or by a scientific project, should be considered,

    10. t advocating for their policy preferences

      Do doctors and other professions not advocate for cutting edge discoveries, treatments, etc? If we are knowledgeable about a subject why shouldn't we be the advocates? Asking us not to is like asking a fisher to not advocate for fishers. Doesn't make sense to me.

    Annotators

  3. Dec 2023
    1. Another possibility is that the disturbance protocols,337 although being of standardised duration, had differing impacts on individuals due to variation338 in their size/ mass, physiological state, energy reserves and stamina. Using the same duration339 of exercise for all fish is therefore not necessarily representative of what they would340 experience in true catch and release angling, where fish with greater stamina will tend to be341 exercised for longe

      Hmmmm I would love to know why they didn't account for these things in their study design

    2. the observed effects329 of the simulated C&R protocols on offspring mortality and viability in the present study were330 independent of whether the stressor was applied to the mother or father

      Veryyyyy interesting. That is confusing because if my theory about the development of the gametes is true then it would NOT be independent of parental sex.

    3. Egg mortality was lower in families where the experimental parent was trapped towards the314 end of the collection period. Since fish could not bypass the trap on their upstream migration,315 and the trap was emptied daily, late-trapped fish were possibly those that had entered the316 river relatively late in the migration season and so may have been feeding more recently (and317 so were in better body condition) than those captured earlier. Alternatively, the impact of318 C&R angling on subsequent reproduction may depend on the maturational state of the319 gametes at the time of the angling event, as suggested for other causes of parental stress

      I would think it is the latter since the eggs would be less impacted by a stressor they were impacted by when they were already almost developed

    4. total offspring mortality within the first299 three months of feeding was higher when the experimental parent had been exposed to air,300 with the effect primarily arising from a greater vulnerability to the fungus Saprolegnia spp.,301 leading to a higher mortality during a 12-day fungal outbreak

      Hmmmmm interesting. I wonder if this value would be even higher if they hadn't removed the fungal infected eggs.

    5. there was no effect on the date of first feeding. What was affected was the size of297 the offspring: individuals from the extended air exposure group were smaller at first feeding298 compared to those from the control group

      That makes sense to me. Why would their date of feeding change? In my mind it would stay the same but they would be disadvantaged when they did feed.

    6. Additionally, the offspring yolk sac volume (YSV) was smaller in294 the groups where the experimental parent, again irrespective of sex, had been subjected to295 exercise and air exposure

      both the extended and non-extended air exposure

    7. there was292 evidence of higher egg mortality from parents (of either sex) that had been exposed to air for293 an extended period (120 s).

      Only in the 120 s group though

    8. Table 1 Summary of the four treatment groups used in the experiment and cumulative levelsof acute disturbance they represent, indicated by the number of asterisks.

      Ah, so here are their groups. I wonder if this is representative of time it takes actual anglers to catch and release fish? The exercise seems short to me and the air exposure seems long...

    9. at least 5 fry were actively consuming feed

      Why 5? Seems so arbitrary. Also: feeding once or consistently feeding? The same 5 or just random five at any time? (same time or five at any point)

    10. Dead eggs were removed from the trays daily, to prevent any fungal growth from spreading165 to healthy neighbouring eggs

      But by removing these eggs doesn't it artificially dampen the impact of CR? (Wouldn't true CR lead to those eggs staying present and killing more of the eggs?)

    11. its eggs were fertilised with the sperm from a randomly-selected non-136 experimental male

      Ah, interestting so they didn't want to see how spawning would play into it. ONLY how the eggs are directly impacted. I think the compounding impacts of spawning impacts +these impacts may be way larger? Good future research

    12. fish being hooked and potentially incurring129 physical damage to the mouth

      I wonder why they didn't include fishing hook damage considering males may fight each other (hurt mouth=reduced fitness)

  4. Nov 2023
    1. Direct measurements present opportunities to scale up andcompare against remotely sensed estimates

      Ah so you are showing that your study will have multiple methods confirming what you find. Great!

    2. Where forests overlay shallow soils

      Ohhhhhhh are you saying that the thin soil in PNW forests does not hold water so the trees are supported by mostly deeper sources of water and the broadleaf trees which utilize these deeper sources more efficiently will edge out the connifers?

    3. evergreen broadleaf trees like English holly

      If broadleafs are transpiring mostly later in the season than conifers AND draw water from different resources then what is the problem? Where is the competition?

    4. however native madrone

      Is this relevant because madrone is a broadleaf tree and that transpirational and water source use difference could negatively impact the naturally conifer dominated PNW forests?

    5. Moreover, forest species composition isactively shifting due to management practices like logging, the spread of introduced (non-native,sometimes “invasive”) species, and anthropogenic climate change

      My interpretation is that because forest composition is changing, we need to understand how their water use interactions are likely to occur.

    6. the existence ofdifferent hydrological niches translates to larger patterns in forest health and environmental functionthrough space and time

      Having some examples of what these long term patterns translate to or what species they impact would really drive the importance of your research home.

    7. soil appears thin

      What does this have to do with water? Does thin water hold less water so we would expect fewer species? If soil depth is independent of water, then make this a separate paragraph. If it is connected to water, please make this idea more clear.

    8. which fellat an earlier time out of sync with maximum atmospheric evaporative demand

      My interpretation of this is that there is very little rain AND it falls out of synch with when trees need it most. Has it always been this way? Or has this mismatch started to occur because of climate change?

    9. Along with discharge,transpiration is balanced within the water cycle by precipitation

      Unless you're bringing discharge up again, i would leave it out of the paper and keep the focus on precipitation. (ex: One major contributor to balancing transpiration is precipitation).

    10. intense storm events

      Wouldn't intense storm events increase water availability? I am confused how this ties into your introduction which previously only addressed LACK of water.

    11. Few studies compare water relations between species in the Pacific Northwest, andthere are no known studies including introduced species despite their growing prevalence, debatablenaturalization, and concerns they may monopolize groundwater

      Great identification of gaps in science!

    Annotators

  5. Sep 2023
    1. Pacific salmon recovery plans remainunderfunded relative to the magnitude of the problem, andexisting restoration plans have not been fully implementedanywhere in the region

      Yeah. Pay us to work and we will!

    2. perhaps establishment of a central clear-inghouse where monitoring organizations can store and sharedata and other types of information, would enhance the valueof monitoring efforts

      This would require someone to be in charge of organizing/ controlling this database. This brings up questions of power: what organization(s) would have control of it? And also of funding: what individual/group would get paid to maintain this?

    3. Because organizations that conduct monitoringare often unaware of other monitoring efforts in their area ofinterest, exchange of data and other important informationoften does not occur.

      Data rights also play a part. Even when organizations know of each other's work, they may be hesitant to share data before it is published.

    4. Most monitoring efforts have been directedtowards estimating abundance and productivity, as discussedabove. However, monitoring of spatial structure and diver-sity are increasingly being recognized as equally importantaspects of Pacific salmon response to habitat restoration

      Perhaps also health of fish? (toxins present in body, sea-lice infestations, etc)

    5. Based on modeling, Roni et al. (2010) concludedthat, on average, 20% of floodplain and in-channel habitatwould have to be restored to produce a 25% increase in CohoSalmon and steelhead smolt production

      And what level of restoration needs to occur on that 20%? Back to historical baselines of the habitat?

    6. smoltcounts are often aggregates of multiple natal populations,which means the abundance trends can be difficult or impos-sible to associate with habitat changes caused by restoring aspecific stream reach

      This isn't something I have thought deeply about before. Interesting.

    7. Furthermore, the habitat andfish population measurements must be collected in a mannerthat enables habitat changes due to restoration to be linked todemographic changes in Pacific salmon

      Any statistics people have insights into what would be needed to do this?

    8. These factors suggest that monitoring over adecade or more may be required to discern any meaningfultrends in either physical or biological response to restoration

      Or pulsed or delayed monitoring.

    9. To achieve a net improvement in Pacific salmon habitat,the quantity and quality of habitat lost must be less than theamount of habitat being restored

      Not necessarily true if parts of the habitat are not as important as others.

    10. However, the cost ofconducting these detailed analyses is usually much less thanthe cost of implementing a large, but ultimately unsuccessful,restoration program.

      But also less flashy. How do we get the politicians and public to implement something that doesn't SOUND as appealing or helpful? In other words, how do we explain this?

    11. Coordinating measures to improve habitat condition withactions to address other factors impacting Pacific salmonabundance will be required to recover populations.

      And an understanding of whether these stressors interact additively, synergistically, etc.

    12. Nonetheless, available results clearly indicate that anincreased emphasis on trophic processes in limiting factorassessments, restoration planning, and project selection iswarranted.

      Emphasis on trophic dynamics and how they are expected to change over time.

    13. and identification andincorporation of all relevant determinants of survival

      AND inclusion of how those are changing because of conditions such as climate change. For example, if predation or competition between species is included in the model but changes in those other fish populations is not accounted for, then the models aren't accurate

    14. We sug-gest five primary factors, which are discussed in detail below:

      Is it possible that "restoration was too late because populations were already so low", "lack of adherence to restorative efforts such as illegal catch or logging", or "greater oceanic conditions" could also be factors?What went into choosing these five?

    Annotators