Any tool that we require students to use should meet a variety of standards: as accessibility and privacy come to mind in this case. Can all our students use this tool? If we require students to collaborate with ChatGPT, are we forcing them to give up their intellectual property? At the moment probably not, but that could change at any time.

I'm struck by the bold statement here. Are you confident this cannot be reproduced by generative AI? Has someone tried and shown that it can't be done?

I asked ChatGPT: "Which part of this would you annotate?" And then pasted all of #1 on this list. It responded:

"If students are annotating throughout a course, across multiple readings, they are writing a lot!"

I would annotate this sentence because it highlights the importance of writing throughout a course, rather than just at the end, and suggests that social annotation can be a helpful tool for scaffolding and accounting for summative assessments.

Do we want to include anything about the playtesting?