Words to confront:
"in a rich silk and silver Morning Gown", "I'll do you no harm, if you forbear this Noise; but otherwise take what follows"; vs. "The poor Booby frightened out", "in his Shirt", "pale and trembling".
If we confront these words from the first excerpts from Pamela and the ones of Shamela, we can see that there is a lot to say about how each of the authors perceive the hierarchy, wealthy people and thus their representations.
First, let us talk about his clothes and how they are described: “rich silk and silver morning gown” highlights in a very strong manner the wealth of the Master by his clothes. The use of the adjective ‘rich’ can only serve as an important remark that the author wants us to imagine about his personality and what matters here; ‘silk and silver morning gown’, dressed as someone from the upper class in the society because this is who he is in the eyes of Richardson. His clothes represent him and reveals his personality and who we should always remember that he is.
In comparison, the clothes from the second excerpt, Fielding does not take much into account what he is dressed, he just uses the phrase “in his Shirt”, as simply as possible, there is no wealth, or prosperity transmitted by what he is wearing.
For Fielding, it is not important what he wears and also shows in a way that he is humble and modest, which contributes to representing an image of the Squire as an ‘innocent’ in the story and Shamela, as a “Shame” on Pamela for transfigurating and deforming the story as she did in the initial novel.