After reading this section I realized this was the same Huey Long that was from the same parish in Louisiana that my husband is from. His idea of “Every Man a King” is a far stretch from the society we live in today. I wonder what would have resulted had he had a chance at Presidency. Although this concept may be difficult to conceive in today's world, I can see how it may have appealed to the people, especially coming from the great depression.

Long’s questioning on how the Declaration of Independence claim…. I find valid. A man born to poverty does not have the same equal opportunities to prosper as the man who comes from financial wealth. This is not to say they can not both prosper, however to say they are running an equal race or one is not given a head start in life, one would have to be delusional.

I personally do not think a cap on wealth would have been a bad concept. The idea that there are people with more money than they know what to do with, while others may not have food or shelter is quite absurd. What is the purpose of an over abundance of money you can take with you when you die?

The readings give insight to the thinking and profound passion of these two men. Both men had similar intentions and desires to push their race to prosperity, however DuBois’ words present with an undertone of frustration. For DuBois to refer to Washington’s speech as his propaganda, that caused further oppression to an oppressed race is a clear insult. Washington’s address attempts to resonate with different races and introduce a common ground. He also attempted to encourage his race and empower through patience and resilience. DuBois denounces Washington’s suggestions.