This seems to be the claim for the conclusion. This claim is identifying how parks generally make people happier by showing key evidene of lowering stress, health, and much more.

This is the evidence of increse in anxiety when not being exposed to different natural environment spaces like parks. The evidence shows that the claim is true.

Nice citiation to prove your claim about non exposed Atlanta workers.

This is sure to be in my opinion the claim for this paragraph, because you have introduced the amount of NEGATIVE affect on ones feeelings of those residents who live in the city, who can not get the chance of being exposed to the natural environment.

Good evidence to support the claim of how people can feel when they visit this park. Not only that, but good citing and including source into the evidence for the claim.

The claim for this paragraph is how Piedmont Park changes the way people can feel when visting this park.

Nice including citation inside of the article. Also good using evidence of how it has affeted the claim, which n this case is increasing mood disorders of those who live in cities than those who do not.

It seems like your claim here is the people in Atlanta who are more exposed to buildings do not really get the chance to see the outside world as much. Not only that but I can also interpert how it can effect Atlant's residents.

This is significant evidence about how the certain architectural themes can contribute to the space by proving the experment of how colors affect peoples mood. This example went well along with your claim. Also good including the source.

It is clear to me that your claim here is the space of Piedmont Park and how locations and colors can affect people.

Good thesis, makes it clear what the rest of the article is goint to talk about and why. The claim here seems to be about how a park, Piedmint Park in particular makes people feel better in life and become more happy and relaxing. You used good evidence with this claim by stating your thesis about what the rest of the article will talk about.

This was the concluding statement in which the authors still wanted to stretch the idea of "open space" being important to students in universities. In my opinion, this article was beneficial to me and taught me a lot about spacial learning, how their designs are, and the backgrounds behind them.

Immediately I can strongly say that this can relate to Robert Rosenberger's article," How Cities Use Designs to Drive People Away"because of the campus "expresses something about the quality of academic life". This is similar to his article because he explained to his audience about "social roles." For instance, he stated that many people are unaware of these social roles, which can cause them to be blinded by many important things. With this being stated, "Recognizing Campus Landscape as Learning Spaces" by Kathleen Gscholl, and Gowri Betrabet Gulwadi, states that the campus expresses "something". This "something" can have a lot of social background that many may not be aware of just like the "social roles".

Rosenberger, Robert. "How Cities Use Design to Drive Homeless People Away." The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company, 19 June 2014. Web. 22 Feb. 2017.

This can be related to Robert Roseberger's article, "How Cities Use Design to Drive Homeless People Away", because they are basing it off of a "design features" that may require the social role of association with attention restoration. People may or may not be aware of these but it clearly states here what the design is for.

Rosenberger, Robert. "How Cities Use Design to Drive Homeless People Away." The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company, 19 June 2014. Web. 22 Feb. 2017.

With this being stated and with my prior research on this, is it possible for there to be too much of a focus on the environment/ nature. Could it disturb your previous knowledge or thinking?

Attention Restoration Theory (ART) (Kaplan, 1989, 1995) is a suggestion that gives a mental fatigue feeling and concentration to increase by time that is spent looking at environments and nature. It is supposed propose an exposure to nature which helps for a more effortless brain functioning by decreasing attention capacity.

Garside, Ruth, Dr. "Attention Restoration Theory: A Systematic Review | ECEHH." European Centre for Environment and Human Health | ECEHH. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Feb. 2017.

This quote instantly makes me think that universities want to have little space so they can include more buildings that will pertain to the school curriculum itself. I feel like universities are always trying to expand because of new technology coming into place and new material being taught in schools today. Therefore I feel like it is good to have a scarce amount of open space as long as it is beneficial to students.

I am curious to know what some of the "classic designs of America's first institutions" looked like, so I decided to include a couple of pictures below:

• This is Harvard University located in Massachusetts, which was established around 1636

• The College of William and Mary, which was esatblished in 1693.

And my question to this statement is if nature is supposed to have an affect on student learning? Does it help increase their thinking space?

"10 of the Oldest Universities in the US." Top Universities. N.p., 30 Sept. 2016. Web. 24 Feb. 2017.

Because I am a college student , I do agree with this statement. I notice that when Im more involved in clubs/sports and organizations my grades have a significant increase all because i'm more active in what I am doing. Not only that but there are so many organizations that are regards to actual school work that are basically getting you to do even more with your time. So in all honesty, I agree with this statement 100%.

Rosenberger, Robert. "How Cities Use Design to Drive Homeless People Away." The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company, 19 June 2014. Web. 22 Feb. 2017.

In this article, Robert Rosenberger talks about how how cities are using different architecture features around their towns to prevent homeless people from being there. For instance, there has been a a surprising and horrific idea that has surfaced the area of London, when regards to homeless people. Sometime around July 2014, an Instagram/Twitter photo had begun to splurge the internet. It was a picture of a London apartment complex that had a long chain of metal spike/studs that were built into the ground to prevent homeless people from sitting there and sleeping there over night. Luckily, many people did not agree with this new appearance. In fact, the mayor of London said it to be "ugly, self defeating & stupid".The spikes were later removed once a petiton almost reached 130,000 people. Even though many people agreed with this was a horrible and ugly act, many people are still blinded by the all over geographical anti-homeless acts around cities.

Robert took it into to effect to show everyone that the spikes that appeared in London to prevent homeless people from sleeping there, was not the only thing how cities and towns use creative designs to prevent homeless people, or as he said are "homeless deterrent." Some of there designs include: benches with slats between them, or with very long armrests in between them. There also some benches that are made very uncomfortable so it can help prevent homeless people from staying their to long. Robert intended to use a good example about how people are not aware and are in fact blinded for the reason they were made in the first place. The example he uses is an example about skateboarders deterrents. He says that when people who do not skateboard have no idea that they walk past skateboard deterrents all the time. Another name for them is called "skatestoppers", which doesn't allow skateboarders to do tricks and slides across straight horizontal planes. Everyday people who do not skateboard do not notice these social roles of the deterrents, but skateboards do and are affected by them.

Roberts knowledge about homeless people deterrents helps people understand how cities and towns are using designs to prevent homeless people. He made many people realize their actual social roles and how it is effecting the homeless. He ends his article questioning if people who now know about these other designs, if they will start to become more concerned and aware within the future.

This is the main argument or which seems to be their hypothesis when dealing with students and universities connections. It seems that that believe that they want college college students today have more and more access to different and unique learning environments. Making a change in higher educations to increase learning spaces and outcomes in college students will always be beneficial in my opinion because I feel that it is good to know what will and what will not work in evolving college students learning spaces.

Sibyl Moholy-Nagy (October 29, 1903 – January 8, 1971) was an architectural and art historian. Originally a German citizen, she accompanied her husband, the Hungarian Bauhaus artist László Moholy-Nagy, in his move to the United States. She is the author of one of the most important and influential[by whom?] studies of his work, Moholy-Nagy: Experiment in Totality, plus several other books on architectural history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sibyl_Moholy-Nagy

"Sibyl Moholy-Nagy." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 03 Feb. 2017.

Terminus post quem, Latin for "limit after which," is used to indicate the date after which an artifact must have been deposited. https://anthropology.si.edu/writteninbone/comic/activity/pdf/TPQ.pdf

Quem, Definition: Terminus Post. Definition: Terminus Post Quem (n.d.): n. pag. Web.

This shows that the both the earthquake from the supplemental reading and the area of Parting Ways had objects that related to their culture that was beneficial to practices and their roots. In this case the the destruction was related to African American ritual that led to their roots, while in the other led to its roots in Italy.

This shows a comparison between the supplemental reading of Historic Treasures Lost, Damaged in Italian Quake. This shows that both sites had a bad damage of quality historic sites being ruined.

The supplemental reading that I read was the Historical Treasures Lost, Damaged in Italian Quake by Alanne Orjoux. This article was an earthquake that damaged a lot of important and beneficial historic cites. One in particular that caught my attention that they named was the cathedral in Urbino. According to this article, it has said to have been at least 293 historic assets that were badly damaged where the earthquake have taken place in Italy. Not only was that cathedral caught in the earthquake but there were also a few more. This earthquake left behind a tragic mess and left many artifactual assets to be badly affected or even completely damaged.

Towns all over Italy were hit but the Amatrice the Basilica Di San Francesco and the Chiesa di Sant Agostino were the towns that haven been said to have completely caved in. Inside of these collapsing cities and towns held the the cities historic medieval walls that was badly destroyed. The medieval walls cite carried lots of information and was a big site for Italy's cultural values. At this place it has some incredible and remarkable history of that relates back to the 10th century in which the people have cared and showed their love for the historic site. But in the end Italy seems to turn all the bad into something good by having their people visit the areas that were badly damaged as a sign of paying their respects to the certain sites.

Were these the only people who lived here? Was it really all that small? Why wasn't their enough information about these men that are important to history based off of their achievments? Is something being hidden?

What materials were actually being used? Why were there not enough to prove these facts? Who were the people that found out these results?

This is a good question to pose since their was little to no facts or information about about Cato, Prince,Plato, and Quamany. This could help them pose more information about African Americans background and earlier history. I believe you would need a high degree of cultural survival and African American history.

Why is it there a sign of this if the four of them were so called supposed to be free men? Why at the end does it state that they were freed, but yet still have the title of "HERE LIE THE GRAVES OF FOUR NEGRO SLAVES"?

This answers my question earlier of if Cato, Plato, Prince, and Quamany were the only ones to live in Parting Ways.

Here is where I began to notice that "Parting Ways" was not just about Cato Howe's existence at this site but also the lives of Plato Turner, Prince Goodwin, and Quamany. Here is where I also saw that Deetz (the author) was beginning to make a connection of their community.

To my prior knowledge, this is some form of payment from the government that you can receive during retirement from past employment experience.

According to my prior knowledge, this was the battle that was one of the very first battles that lead up to the Revolutionary War. In this war the British defeated the Americans, which lead Americans to become a lot more confident and patriotic to override the British army.

This shows that the author is trying to begin making the connection of showing how it was like being African American and contributing to the the United States Army, while African Americans were still not given equal opportunities as other Americans. Basically, the author is enforcing a better understanding of what Cato Howe's life was like being an African American and serving the United States Army.

This is where the title of this article came from. In other words, the title "Parting Ways" comes from Howe's site of community of which he lived until his death.