12 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2025
    1. But it would be historically inaccurate to reduce the contributions of black people to the vast material wealth created by our bondage. Black Americans have also been, and continue to be, foundational to the idea of American freedom. More than any other group in this country’s history, we have served, generation after generation, in an overlooked but vital role: It is we who have been the perfecters of this democracy.

      Such a powerful paragraph and an even more powerful last statement. I think Black Americans do show how great of a democracy we do have. Although painful and hard to endure, Black Americans fought for what they knew they deserved for 100s of years, without giving up.

    2. Before the abolishment of the international slave trade, 400,000 enslaved Africans would be sold into America. Those individuals and their descendants transformed the lands to which they’d been brought into some of the most successful colonies in the British Empire. Through backbreaking labor, they cleared the land across the Southeast. They taught the colonists to grow rice. They grew and picked the cotton that at the height of slavery was the nation’s most valuable commodity, accounting for half of all American exports and 66 percent of the world’s supply.

      This really highlights how wealthy the slave trade made many Americans. Using evidence such as the fact that the colonies were some of the most successful under the whole empire, and cotton grown in the colonies was 66 percent of the global supply.

    3. In August 1619, just 12 years after the English settled Jamestown, Va., one year before the Puritans landed at Plymouth Rock and some 157 years before the English colonists even decided they wanted to form their own country, the Jamestown colonists bought 20 to 30 enslaved Africans from English pirates.

      This illustrates the beginning of the American slave trade. It's crazy to think that then English decided to buy slaves without knowing if they were to form a country yet.

  2. Jun 2025
    1. All of the following are considered plagiarism: turning in someone else's work as your own copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit failing to put a quotation in quotation marks giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on "fair use" rules)

      When using other sources in your work, it's important to note that something as small as misusing quotation marks can be plagiarism. Or even using so much of a singular source that it makes up a majority of your work, it's important to note what does and doesn't count as plagiarism so that we as researchers don't accidentally commit a crime.

    2. But can words and ideas really be stolen?

      Yes, 100%. Something that you've thought of and written down or created is your property and solely yours. If someone wants to pass it off as their own, they will have committed plagiarism.

    3. In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else's work and lying about it afterward.

      Plagiarism is quite literally pretending to be something you're not. It's important to note that as long as you give credit properly and don't try and pass someone else's work off as your own, it's perfectly fine.

    1. Views also vary by age. Older adults in 12 countries are less likely to say that social media is a good thing for democracy in their country when compared to their younger counterparts. In Japan, France, Israel, Hungary, the UK and Australia, the gap between the youngest and oldest age groups is at least 20 percentage points and ranges as high as 41 points in Poland, where nearly nine-in-ten (87%) younger adults say that social media has been a good thing for democracy in the country and only 46% of adults over 50 say the same.

      This excerpt highlights how views can easily vary by age. This divide may reflect that younger people are often more fluent in algorithm based social media platforms then their older peers.

    2. In eight countries, those who believe that the political system in their country allows them to have an influence on politics are also more likely to say that social media is a good thing for democracy.

      This implies that people who feel that their voices are heard more by politicians whether or not it's because of social media tend to think of these platforms as a good thing for democracy. This makes you wonder if media has a role in this belief.

    3. Those who view the spread of false information online as a major threat to their country are less likely to say that social media is a good thing for democracy

      this suggests that misinformation, often fed to us by unknowing algorithms is able to distort public opinion. As outlined in the text, this distortion is harmful for individuals' views on social media and democracy.

    1. For a democratic society to function, it depends upon the majority of its people to be active within the democratic process. In many democracies, this is increasingly not the case. Schools should engage students in becoming active, and proactive, democratic participants. An academic civics course will scratch the surface, but to nurture a deeply rooted respect for democracy, it is essential to give young people real-life democratic experiences long before they come of age to vote.

      This paragraph does a good job pointing that certain topics such as civics/government are not enough to guide younger people into becoming an active and contributing member of society through allowing their voice to be heard.

    2. Education should enable students to become economically responsible and independent.

      As someone deeply involved in investing for my future as a teenager, I hold this passage to be true. During high school, and even college, I was only ever taught the barebones and basics of investing and anything else that provides monetary value. I believe core education should dive deeper into all economic topics for young learners.

    3. We just need to be clear on terms. There are a few terms that are often confused or used interchangeably—“learning,” “education,” “training,” and “school”—but there are important differences between them. Learning is the process of acquiring new skills and understanding. Education is an organized system of learning. Training is a type of education that is focused on learning specific skills. A school is a community of learners: a group that comes together to learn with and from each other. It is vital that we differentiate these terms: children love to learn, they do it naturally; many have a hard time with education, and some have big problems with school.

      This whole paragraph really hit the nail right on the head in my opinion. Those four terms cannot be used interchangeably because they all mean different things entirely. I believe that everyone loves to learn naturally, it's the vector through which their education is brought to them in that plays a key role in determining if the training or education was valuable.