75 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2017
    1. Basically, everything we do as we design the program starts with a fundamental question: how can we make education more accessible to everyone?

      I love this. Making education more accessible is something that can help to create more jobs, new research, better living situations, etc. The cost of college is astronomical, there are brilliant minds out there in this country that do not have the ability to pay for college. With tuition costs rising and student loan availability declining, education is growing further out of reach for some populations

    2. Open textbook

      Easily one of the best parts of #IDSintro was not having to purchase a textbook. As students we are hung out to dry while trying to buy textbooks. We already pay so much money to the university for housing, tuition, parking passes, fees, etc. One would think text book prices wouldn't be absolutely through the roof. It's hard especially when you support yourself to afford all the textbooks that are required. Having more classes with open textbooks would allow students to have money for things such as groceries or a new pair of boots or a jacket....things that are essential while living in the mountains.

    3. Empowers learners to contribute to– not just consume– knowledge;

      When I first started this class I was like "oh dear lord I hate technology, why do I have to have a Twitter Account, how in the world am I going to make my own website." Now that I am nearing the end of the semester I couldn't imagine NOT having those things. The way this program has been developed and the way Robin teaches is truly something that should be adopted by more teachers. Giving us more sovereignty over our education, allowing us to post articles in our own voices, building a PLN that provides viable information for future careers, all of these things have contributed to my love of learning and has allowed my passion for being a student to flourish. I feel as though I've had the opportunity to add to other students knowledge by writing in my own voice and publishing articles to my ePort that I think actually matter to the field I'll be joining after graduation.

    4. many students do not get their programs accepted by the Interdisciplinary Studies Council (seven faculty who serve from different areas of the university) on their first try (so far, 100% of students are admitted on their second try after receiving constructive feedback from our Council).

      Reading this makes me realize how hard I worked on my program at the beginning of the semester. It was my goal to have my program accepted on the first try, and I was going to do whatever it took to get it there. All the effort I put in did not go unnoticed. All three of my advisors (Robin, Dr. Levy & Dr. McCahan who all happen to be on the IDS council) were impressed with my essay ideas in the early stages of development. I was dead set on calling my program Sports Medicine and I did everything to prove to the council members it was an appropriate title. Having to put all this work and effort into making a program really makes you appreciate what kind of student you have become and how YOU are impacting YOUR education: as an older student it is important to me to have as much control over my education as possible. Being successful on my first try of getting my program approved strengthened my confidence as a student and also helped develop a deeper passion for the disciplines I included.

    5. between 60% and 70% of graduating #PlymouthIDS majors claimed that they would have left PSU if they hadn’t enrolled in the IDS program.

      Enrolling in the IDS program was the smartest decision I have made in my five years of college. I spent one year out of school thinking every day about what I was going to do with my life, knowing two associates degrees were not going to get me very far. I knew about the IDS program from being a student here my freshman year in 2012, but I wasn't really sure what it was or how it worked. Upon discussions with my advisor we decided IDS was the best and fastest way to get me a bachelors degree. Without #PlymouthIDS I'm not sure I would have ever finished my education, which would have been a damn shame because I know how strong of a student I am and what an impact I'm going to make in my graduate degree program and my future career.

    6. First we serve students who are highly self-motivated, creative, and autodidactic. These are students who have out-of-the-box ideas for interdisciplinary degrees that are based on their own personal passions and life goals.

      IDS here at PSU has let my own creativity and passions flourish by building my very own program. I am a transfer student that has always been very highly self motivated and passionate about learning. Combining all the courses I've taken between two institutions, and through various different majors to create a degree program that serves the purpose of getting me to the next step in my education: Graduate School. Not only does my program lay the foundation of knowledge to be successful in graduate school, it also satisfies all the prerequisite courses needed for the specific program I have chosen.

    1. By integrating these fields within the interdisciplinary studies, the information has become more advanced and any missing gaps of information have started to closed in due to the overlap of information.

      great articulation of how IDS can benefit individual disciplines

    2. The concept of childhood ethics has a lot of gaps in knowledge. That is where the interdisciplinary parts come in to take the information from different disciplines to create a better understanding of the concept.

      i love these sentences. this should be a wide spread idea. when there are gaps in knowledge, take things from other areas to fill the gaps.

    3. The authors discuss all the different types of disciplines that are collaborated to make this an interdisciplinary project.

      its interesting when you really think about how many different projects are interdisciplinary and or multidisciplinary. Once we started learning more about it, its easy to see why people say that the world and life is interidisciplinary.

    1. Overall, it takes many different disciplines in order to successfully fly a group of people around the world.

      physics, engineering, communications, etc. great article about how simple it is to break every day life down into disciplines and show interdisciplinarity

    2. There are many employees behind the scenes that deal with the planning and logistics that customers don’t realize.

      i feel like most people may know this.... there is much behind the scenes work in almost every aspect of commercial businesses.

    3. You don’t just appear in the sky, there are tons of details that go into flying that many people don’t even realize.

      this could apply to anything. there are tons of details involved in just about everything we do that most people don't realize. making us really think, life is interdisciplinary

    1. “I will not settle for less! I will make the most of my opportunities!”

      this is great. this student is like reading my mind or something. this piece was a great representation of what IDS is

    2. With metacognition, you are able to take your mind out of society’s views and have your own views.

      thankfully this concept is not new to me. I have always been very in touch with my education and being an IDS major now is just helping that grow exponentially.

    3. Interdisciplinary studies in and of itself is thinking abstractly and creatively. It is bringing things together to create this abstractness that people will appreciate just for that fact that it is a different way of thinking—a new perspective.

      LOVE THIS. its so true. not every student has the ability to think so creatively to bring different disciplines together. it continues to expand our ability think creatively and abstractly making IDS majors well rounded students and more marketable overall.

    4. Engaging in Interdisciplinary studies has broadened my understanding of entrepreneurship, abstract thinking, metacognition, and love of learning

      I love this opening, i totally connect with the love of learning part. I have never enjoyed classes as much as this year after creating my own program

    1. An overarching fear of interdisciplinarity is the “10,000 hour rule,” meaning interdisciplinary students might graduate as masters of nothing. Instead of graduating with a comprehensive understanding of a single discipline like anthropology or economics, they graduate with a smattering of knowledge, spread across many fields.

      in some cases this could be true but in others it is not because some students may be using their IDS knowledge to take them to grad school where they will be focusing on one major discipline. But they will have the ability to draw on their knowledge from studying IDS for problem solving etc.

    2. The communication barrier poses a unique challenge to interdisciplinarity: is collaboration possible without a common language?

      common language is helpful but not necessarily needed if those involved are well versed in their disciplines there are ways to communicate.

    3. The first barrier facing interdisciplinary students is attitude.

      attitude is everything. ypu get out what you put into things and if you choose to put a bad attitude into something, you won't get anything good out of it

    4. collaboration is sometimes just as important, if not more important, than individualized focus.

      i agree whole heartedly with this. collaboration is so important, not only the ability to work with a team but to weave within disciplines is a skill that is needed for success in most settings.

    1. Due to the responsibility associated with interdisciplinarity, students must learn how to make concrete decisions, how to effectively combine multiple disciplines into a cohesive major, and how to know what they want.

      my best decision in five years of college was to return to PSU as an interdisciplinary studies major. I honestly do not think I would have returned if my advisor hadn't put this idea in my head. the ability to have educational freedom before i head to grad school is rivaled by close to nothing. as an older student i know what i want from my classes and my education and I know how to get it and IDS has helped me accomplish that

    2. Education is about more than passing a test or being accepted to the “right” school, it’s about self-discovery and personal growth as an individual.

      your education is what YOU make it. no one can change that or take it away from you. If you want education to be about personal growth than you better make sure thats what you make it about.

    3. Education is real. Education is now. Education is not a simulation preparing students for an imaginary destination.

      i love this. some people think this is what college does. preps you for this imaginary goal career.

    1. By challenging themselves with a variety of educational experiences, interdisciplinary students become better critical thinkers, gain more self-awareness, and grow more confident in the way their brains work and who they are as people.

      currently in my fifth year of education I can say the way I have approached learning has created a side of me that not many students will have the opportunity to develop. Changing majors so many times, transferring, and taking a year off completed focused my attention on how i was going to achieve what i needed to do and really developed a sense of myself and my learning style along with my ability to reason and critically think.

    2. One of the benefits of a common core trajectory is the sense of community it brings to education, a sense of community that some interdisciplinary students may not experience in the same way that traditional students experience it.

      while this may be true it is quite simple to integrate ones self into the 'common core' of multiple disciplines included in ones personal education layout. Other than that there is opportunity for a strong development of a 'common core' amount IDS students regardless of what their programs entail.

    3. It’s a revolutionary way of learning that encourages cross-disciplinary collaboration, enables students to develop critical thinking skills, and presents many “real world” opportunities for growth.

      really all students should get a chance to experience what interdisciplinarity is like. Its refreshing when I can say that I tailor made my bachelors degree to meet my needs in my future education. When you can take control of something like your education that your spending thousands of dolars on every year it changes your perspective on learning and its importance.

    4. If an applicant can’t work in a team, write a grant, or engage meaningfully with other people, he may be turned away from a job or his career may not flourish.

      to me this concept is common sense. You cannot simply rely on one skill for pretty much anything. Just like when you were applying for colleges, they are looking for well rounded applicants. Involvement in sports, academic clubs, honor societies, volunteer projects etc increase your chances of being admitted to a school. Just like the knowledge you gain and can apply to real life situations makes you more appealing on the job market

    5. If students wander around at their own will, these educators argued, they may leave school with an incomplete or inconclusive education.

      considering the students are the ones paying for said education if they want to wander and finish with incomplete knowledge it should be their choice. professors and educators should be there to do just that, educate. Students should be their own guiding forces of knowledge especially in higher education after twelve years of very rigidly guided academics.

    6. Eliot’s radical views on education are still relevant today. For example, one of his most influential reforms was advocacy for a curriculum based on students’ interests rather than a pre-established curriculum.

      crazy to think that wanting to take students interests into account was considered radical

  2. Oct 2017
    1. It was easiest to see in high school,

      i feel as though i didn't see this much in my high school. We had a lot of teachers that taught multiple subjects for instance my favorite teacher taught US history, ecociv and psychology.

    1. Even when grouping together to attempt solving a problem as a team, an interdisciplinary attempt can end up being multidisciplinary, where insights can come from two or more disciplines, but lack integration.

      it seems as though it is harder to solve in an interdisciplinary approach because ideas have to come together and create something entirely new

    2. The disciplines, where we find wealths of specific knowledge and, on occasion, narrow-minded specialists, are the very building blocks of interdisciplinary studies.

      calling specialists 'narrow-minded' isnt really fair in my book. They may not be narrow minded they may have just developed a strong passion for the discipline or sub discipline they have chosen.

    1. With Interdisciplinary Studies growing rapidly throughout the United States, students are now able to create their own fields of study by combining many disciplines and making it into their major that reflects their own values, passions, and interests.

      interdisciplinarity should be a requirement at some point of higher education. A student cannot be successful with a pure disciplinary approach any longer

    2. College began to evolve from an elite privilege for only certain kinds of wealthy or powerful people to an essential career resource that could benefit any student.

      it basically feels like unless you have found a trade a college education is a necessity in todays society. i feel as though it is starting to lean more towards needing a master degree rather than a bahelors for a lot of careers which put more pressure on students to figure out how they will pay for their thousands of dollars worth of education.

    3.  It is evident that as society changes, the academic fields adapt and shift to accommodate the kinds of learning that the world needs.

      why technology based classes are on the rise and integrated into general education requirements at most universities.

    4. Academics have been constantly changing based on what society feels is important for the students to learn from the beginning of time.

      interesting that academics are based on what society feels is important instead of what students feel is important.

    5. very few undergraduates can actually define what a “discipline” is.

      worries me slightly that my peers may not know what a discipline is, that's a troubling thought

    6. Online courses provide the convenience of not having a designated time to learn, but they at first lacked the legitimacy of a physical university.

      I had no idea online learning evolved from such a simple concept of mailing books and materials around the country and radio/tv broadcasts very fascinating.

    7. Charles Eliot (21st president of Harvard) gave a speech stating that there is no best method or focus for learning, therefore Harvard will have them all. 

      I love the idea that even in the past there was a craving for knowledge among the intellectual population.

    8. The university was originally a mosque and actually created by a woman, Fatima al-Fihri.

      the oldest operating degree granting institution was founded by a woman!?!?!? would ya look at that; thats fricken awesome!

    1. She may become jack of all trades, master of none.

      love this! makes sense, do not have to be the master of something to have a lot of knowledge about it, i feel it is more important to know a lot of things about a lot of things rather than know everything about one thing.

    2. Interdisciplinarians, by contrast, are forever treating themselves to the intellectual equivalent of exploring exotic lands.

      i love this, its true when an interdisciplinary approach is used you can dip into the most interesting facets of each discipline.

    3. An interdisciplinary background may have not caused industry experts to adopt a more balanced view of the tobacco/cancer link, but it might have tempered their outright advocacy of smoking.

      puts into perspective how much more informed and knowledgeable an interdisciplinary approach to research can be.

    4. If you persevered, your broad synthesis may well embody a deeper understanding than any uni-disciplinary approach could possibly muster.

      understanding that most topics include many, many different disciplines and theories and parts is a huge part of interdisciplinary work.

    5. Disciplinary researchers seem capable of filling productive, yet unoccupied, niches, so that the opportunities for fruitful research in the gray areas among the disciplines are perhaps not missed for long.

      this quote relates to what I want to bring to my career. As an athletic trainer I want to focus not only on the physical health of athletes but also the mental health of athletes. Not that this is a forgotten idea but it is extremely important.

    6. Indeed, with more thinkers straddling more disciplines, and with greater tolerance for interdisciplinary conceptualizations and vocabularies, such embarrassing episodes would be less common than they are now (cf. Whitman, 1953).

      the implication that those who are open to interdisciplinary work are great thinkers is cool, because its right. We definitely learned that in class trying to put together out programs.

    7. An outsider’s perspective, then, is particularly valuable at times of crisis.

      its like when youre too close to the situation you can't see the simple answer, a fresh pair of eyes, or an outsider, can see things more clearly and help find the solution with ease

    8. The first cause is obvious: immigrants bring fresh insights and methodologies from their old disciplines. This may include, in particular, a more fruitful way of telling apart wheat from chaff.

      i like how he refers to people changing disciplines as immigrants.

    9. The very act of creation often involves the bringing together of previously unrelated ideas

      i feel as though in a lot of IDS programs the disciplines we bring together aren't always completely unrelated.

    10. Our current mechanistic model divides disciplines into numerous blocks of specializations; it is inaccurate  . . . and misleading.

      within specialization there should be knowledge across the entirety of the subject with all subdivisions included.

    1. In some ways, epistemology explains the why of a discipline: why it focuses on certain content and why it chooses the methods that it chooses.

      culminating the why how and what of a discipline is the first step to understanding the type of work that will be done. without understanding these concepts and how they relate there is no way to be successful.

    1. This is called “drilling down” a problem. We can also think of breaking a larger whole into its parts in order to understand the whole more fully, and this is called “systems thinking.”

      being taught from a young age to break down complex problems into smaller more solvable ones has given me the upper hand in understanding how different disciplines can be applied to one issue.

    1. Interdisciplinary studies is “a process of answering a question, solving a problem, or addressing a topic that is too broad or complex to be dealt with adequately by a single discipline or profession,” and it “draws on disciplinary perspectives and integrates their insights through construction of a more comprehensive perspective”

      this is why I feel I have constructed a strong interdisciplinary program, even the title 'Sports Medicine' is an umbrella term that encompasses many disciplines and professions all working together to solve problems and gather knowledge.

    2. “multidisciplinarity” is like a fruit bowl, where different disciplines are represented by the different fruits that are placed together in a bowl but which do not mix much or change shape themselves. Interdisciplinarity (Photo CCBYNCND Anna Wyrwol) “Interdisciplinarity” is more like a fruit smoothie, where the disciplines are blended together–integrated– to create something new.

      Shaylah Kelly described interdisciplinary work to me like this a few weeks ago and it honestly made so much more sense and helped me build my contract with ease.

    1. Clearly we have to re-evaluate our entire system of education for what it is: an 18- year learning continuum that prepares citizens for a life of learning. We must rid it of unnecessary and wasteful duplication, and create coherence and integrity in our curricula.

      it is true that the entire US education system needs to be re evaluated. We need the focus to shift from general education all through secondary school to letting students find their passions before reaching college.

    2. In just four years, students are expected to be informed about such issues as our nation’s history, democratic society, global economy, international relations, and computer technology, and, for many, to be prepared for graduate study in medicine, law, business, art, architecture, or technical schools.

      I do not agree with this statement because it is not just in four years where students take in all this information. Since the beginning of our educations in elementary school we have been building a foundation of knowledge by the time we reach college, most of those topics should have already been discussed in length. Therefore it would be up to the students to stay on top of these things that are going on in the world around them, not just simply informing themselves.

    3. “The computer cannot provide an organizing moral framework. It cannot tell us what questions are worth asking.”

      this is exactly why as a student I am so on the fence about technology in the classroom. While it has obvious benefits, it is not an end all be all.

    4. Yet such systemic thinking has been slow to catch on, even though the pitfalls of specialization have long been acknowledged and discussed.

      Just like in sports, specialization can be detrimental. to be successful in any career, or life in general knowledge must be well rounded.

    5. complexity of the world requires us to have a better understanding of the relationships and connections between all fields that intersect and overlap — economics and sociology, law and psychology, business and history, physics and medicine, anthropology and political science.

      overlapping of disciplines is easily one of the most important ways to gain the knowledge you need to be successful in your professional life. Knowledge is power and the more knowledge you have that isn't specific to your field, the better in my opinion.

    6. Today’s students fulfill general-education requirements, take specialized courses in their majors, and fill out their schedule with some electives, but while college catalogs euphemistically describe this as a “curriculum,” it is rarely more than a collection of courses, devoid of planning, context, and coherence.

      This is the most fantastic sentence about higher education I've ever read. I feel as though because of the path of my education I find this to be exceptionally true. Curriculums in higher education need to be revamped across the board to ensure students are getting the most out of the education they are paying so much money for.

  3. Sep 2017
    1. Promoting digital ownership is different than assigning work in publicly accessible spaces.

      i'm hoping intro to IDS will give me a little bit of insight into this statement... it's an interesting concept wondering if we're on the right track in this course.

    2. The web is a network for conversations, and if students still see their audience as a teacher with a red pen, then nothing changes.

      This is why I'm sort of confused with universities and colleges pushing for students to have their own domains when the assignments are going to be the same old same old. Whats the point in going through 17 steps to build my own eport when the discussion assignments and posts would be the exact same in a place like moodle

    1. Without such fluency, students cannot compete economically or intellectually, and the astonishing promise of the digital medium will never be fully realized.

      it should be up to the student if they so choose to be fluid in this digital medium. giving students a voice in their education should be in the forefront of every conversation about education.

    2. This vision goes beyond the “personal learning environment”5 in that it asks students to think about the web at the level of the server, with the tools and affordances that such an environment prompts and provides.

      This sounds like a great idea but just me personally if I was forced to learn things about servers and processors that I've never heard of or never plan to use ever again that would make me frustrated and annoyed.

    3. Yet higher education largely failed to empower the strong and effective imaginations that students need for creative citizenship in this new medium.

      I firmly believe higher education still isn't at this point where its pushing students to create their own space to show their work. everything is done on internal university systems and all of our best work is lost in discussion posts and other garbage assignments. While I'm definitely more of a hands on type of student and would prefer not being forced to do everything online there are lost of students pushing for more ability to work in the open net

    4. Best of all, faculty could bring students into these environments without fear that they would be embarrassed by their lack of skill or challenged by students’ unfamiliar innovations.

      when I was in high school we just started getting 'smart boards' in some of our classrooms and not only were our teachers embarrassed that they hadn't had the proper training on how to use them, we as students were also embarrassed because we technologically savvy students couldn't figure them out

    1. These debates do not recognize the ways in which students have already developed rich social lives online and could use help, not punishment or paternalism, in understanding how to think through the data trails they’re leaving behind.

      PREACH this is such a great point! I've had a facebook since 2009 and not once has anyone said 'hey even if your profile is completely private they can still use your information for x, y, and z'

    2. we’re concerned about what students do online but we fail to probe the “appropriateness” of the demands on data and content that (education) technology companies increasingly make on the students in turn.

      if they're so concerned about what students are putting online why is there such a push to gravitate towards more and more online learning and posting. academic work that students do should belong to that student, social media and academic web domains and sights shouldn't be closely related at all. Social media to me is for sharing things with friends. web domains and e portfolios are for scholarly work. period end of story

    3. is often tinged with fears that students will be seen “doing bad things” or “saying bad things” that will haunt them forever.

      something like this wouldn't be referring to an academic platform. it is generally implied that what you put on the internet is there forever so why should students in this day and age have to be cautioned about something that seems like common knowledge to me.

    4. the domain and all its content are the student’s to take with them. It is, after all, their education, their intellectual development, their work.

      Personally, this is one of the best concepts I've ever seen. While again I prefer an old fashion style of learning...taking notes on paper, printing out essays and handing them in, seeing teacher corrections in red ink.....the internet is an integral part of this generations learning style. The ability to access your own scholarly work is something that I'm sure students want and definitely need especially those moving on to higher education such as Master's degrees and PhD's

    5. enables student to build the contemporary version of what Virginia Woolf in 1929 famously demanded in A Room of One’s Own – the necessity of a personal place to write.

      While I am not a huge fan of technology as a fifth year college student, I know the value of creating a space for students to express themselves, scholarly, professionally and personally. It's nice to see that students out there got out and did something that is changing education for the rest of us.