The 1960s and 1970s saw the first steps toward the policies we see today in TANF that take away assistance from families where an adult doesn’t meet a work requirement. The entry of more mothers, especially white mothers, into the workforce shifted public expectations about single mothers and work outside the home. Additionally, growing media attention to a “welfare crisis” and claims that AFDC incentivized women not to marry or work pressured federal policymakers to adopt a new approach to single mothers living in poverty.[93] Many began moving away from the idea that AFDC mothers’ primary responsibility should be caring for their children in the home, rather than working.
This shift hits the family in my class budget directly. One parent can only work part-time because our autistic son needs an adult at home, and that caregiving is real work even though it’s unpaid. A program built on mandatory work requirements treats that parent as someone who just isn’t working enough, instead of someone already doing a full-time job at home. When I compared my budget to EPI, the $0 for child care looked like savings, but it was really lost income. TANF’s design doesn’t count that care as work at all.