13 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2020
    1. All of this is on account we want to register, to become first-class citizens, and if the freedom Democratic Party is not seated now, I question America, is this America, the land of the free and the home of the brave where we have to sleep with our telephones off of the hooks because our lives be threatened daily because we want to live as decent human beings, in America?

      This is truly a testimony because living in the Jim Crow south, Hamer could have easily been killed from this speech alone. Afterall, she started the speech with her personal address. But what this speech did, (along with other activist) is show white supremacist that African Americans were willing to fight and die for civil rights and equality. They would not die in vain. Why was "all of this" necessary? What did it accomplish? How were these white men that became so angry that they would order for women to be beat able to sleep at night? It really shows the prevalence and acceptance of white supremacy in the south. Hamer articulating this experience was another big step towards civil rights because it was on national television and gained attention. She closed her speech with a question that needed to be answered, and left it up for the people of America to decide if this is really the land of the free and the home of the brave.

    2. Civil rights activists struggled against the repressive violence of Mississippi’s racial regime. State NAACP head Medger Evers was murdered in 1963. Freedom Summer activists tried to register black voters in 1964. Three disappeared and were found murdered.

      The courage that it took for Hamer to speak out during a time like this in which African Americans were dying for the right to vote is just simply amazing.

    1. Let everyone who feels he wishes to help in our work start right out and go ahead. One man or woman is as important as any other. Take up the fight! Do not wait for someone else to tell you what to do. There are no high lights in this effort. We have no State managers and no city managers. Everyone can take up the work, and as many societies can be organized as there are people to organize them. One is the same as another. The reward and compensation is the salvation of humanity. Fear no opposition. “He who fails in this fight falls in the radiance of the future!”

      Even though this was the closing of Long's speech, he introduced some new ideas that I'm sure raised some eyebrows. This may not have been a good idea to close such a controversial speech with even more controversy. There are some good aspects of sharing wealth but I'm sure those that had all the wealth thought it was just absolutely absurd. It is saddening that he was assassinated because of his way of thinking.

    2. It is impossible for the United States to preserve itself as a republic or as a democracy when 600 families own more of this Nation’s wealth—in fact, twice as much—as all the balance of the people put together. Ninety-six percent of our people live below the poverty line, while 4 percent own 87 percent of the wealth. America can have enough for all to live in comfort and still permit millionaires to own more than they can ever spend and to have more than they can ever use; but America cannot allow the multimillionaires and the billionaires, a mere handful of them, to own everything unless we are willing to inflict starvation upon 125,000,000 people

      These are interesting fact. I can not help but wonder how did these 600 families become lucky enough to acquire all this wealth.

    3. It may be necessary, in working out of the plans that no man’s fortune would be more than $10,000,000 or $15,000,000.

      This statement is probably what those wealthy men disagreed with most. I believe a stronger driving point should have been sharing rather than limiting.

    4. We do not propose a division of wealth, but we propose to limit poverty that we will allow to be inflicted upon any man’s family.

      Here it is 2020 and individuals making minimum wage are still well below poverty, even with working full time hours.

    5. Now, we have organized a society, and we call it “Share Our Wealth Society,” a society with the motto “Every Man a King.”

      I believe Long's idea was respectable. Even though it may have been too ambiguous for 1934.It models a utopia, however utopias are not necessary perfect but neither is a society that allows children to starve.

    6. Is that right of life, my friends, when the young children of this country are being reared into a sphere which is more owned by 12 men than it by 120,000,000 people?

      It is important to understand the context of Long stating that the children are being reared into a sphere. A child that is born into poverty is already at an increased chance of lifelong poverty because this is what they were reared into. These 12 men however don't care about these children, after all their family will have wealth generation after generation.

    1. The question then comes: Is it possible, and probable, that nine millions of men can make effective progress in economic lines if they are deprived of political rights, made a servile caste, and allowed only the most meagre chance for developing their exceptional men? If history and reason give any distinct answer to these questions, it is an emphatic No. 

      Without a doubt Washington knew that Negros were not looked at as equals even though they had spent their lives working unselfishly. This is something that he wanted to change. He spoke of the years of sacrifices that the Negros made in effort to further drive in the point of the endless possibilities if all races were viewed as equal. I wonder if Washington and DuBois had seen eye to eye what could they have accomplished together.

    2. These movements are not, to be sure, direct results of Mr. Washington’s teachings; but his propaganda has, without a shadow of doubt, helped their speedier accomplishment.

      W.E.B. DuBois's views were so different from Washington's! I never knew that there was a disagreement between the two regarding Negros. In my opinion this compromise that Washington was seeking showed that Negros were not inferior and that they possessed knowledge and skill! To say that it was propaganda is just disrespectful.

    3. In answer to this, it has been claimed that the Negro can survive only through submission. Mr. Washington distinctly asks that black people give up, at least for the present, three things, — First, political power, Second, insistence on civil rights, Third, higher education of Negro youth,–

      I don't follow. I am unsure of why W.E.B. DuBois believed that Washington wanted American Negros to give up anything. He called for the advancement of his people but he knew that it takes collaboration with other races to do so.

    4. As we have proved our loyalty to you in the past, nursing your children, watching by the sick-bed of your mothers and fathers, and often following them with tear-dimmed eyes to their graves, so in the future, in our humble way, we shall stand by you with a devotion that no foreigner can approach, ready to lay down our lives, if need be, in defence of yours, interlacing our industrial, commercial, civil, and religious life with yours in a way that shall make the interests of both races one.

      Washington's choice of words were so clever in this speech. Each word that he spoke had a purpose and it further conveyed the importance of his points. The knowledge that he possessed is what helped him to start the Tuskegee Institute where he passed knowledge on to others.

    5. To those of my race who depend on bettering their condition in a foreign land or who underestimate the importance of cultivating friendly relations with the Southern white man, who is their next-door neighbour, I would say: “Cast down your bucket where you are” — cast it down in making friends in every manly way of the people of all races by whom we are surrounded.

      This quote is simply amazing to me. This speech took place in 1895 and the powerful words are still relevant to today's society. There were and still is tension between people of different races. It takes an open-minded individual to understand that we all need one another. The people to our left and our right may not be the same color, but what they have to offer may be much more than one can imagine.