the adjective diligent is a modifier of the head noun workers. Modifier is a general term for optional elements in a phrase that add descriptive information about the head word.
What's the difference between a modifier and an adjective ?
the adjective diligent is a modifier of the head noun workers. Modifier is a general term for optional elements in a phrase that add descriptive information about the head word.
What's the difference between a modifier and an adjective ?
Garth’s reply
doesn't this become a possessive determiner because of the 's ?
A proper noun is a type of noun that refers to a specific person, place, or thing (Evelyn, Cairo, Saturday, etc.) Common nouns refer to classes of things (cat, trash, stone, etc.) rather than particular ones. All nouns that are not proper are common.
so a proper noun is a pronoun - its more specific rather than a regular noun (common noun) which is generalized
) My wife fed the dog Tuesday morning.
so Tuesday morning with be a P with an adjunct head?
The NP that receives the direct object is called the indirect object
With Ditransitive verbs, I get confused on what the indirect object is sometimes
(8a) Lewis remained an obstinate man
It becomes a linking verb when the subject is connected to it? So when it relates like here they are speaking about the subject?
Samantha was expecting a phone call.
the subject is usually everything before the verb-- which is how I see it
The predicate is realized by a verb phrase, and in the most common case, the subject is realized by a noun phrase.
so in a clause, I have learned that there will always be a verb phase and noun phrase
(2) Russia’s proposal at the conference
before reading the explanation, I thought Russia would be the head because it's where the proposal is coming from
. For example, if you can identify the subject of a sentence, you have analyzed the sentence and identified the role of one important item in it.
is the same as pointing out the subject and predict like we do in class?
Syntax concerns the way that words are arranged into larger units.
In high school, I was also taught that syntax is not only how words are put together but how it connects the rest of the paragraph or piece.
Determiners are words that appear before nouns and specify ideas such as definiteness, quantity.
Something we learned is that the can always be sure to be a determiner
adverb was a catch-all category for everything that was difficult to analyze
Doesn't adverb usually does describe the verb? Or what is being verbed?
It is true that “parts of speech” is misleading if we take the expression literally, as components of language. Clearly, there are many more parts to language than word categories. On the other hand, “part of speech”, as a term of art, differs little in its basic meaning from category.
this comes into light because when we learned about determiners , they have different categories but all go down to the same thing
The first sentence can be completed with words like bicycle, shoes, worries, ability, home, etc.
This is true because it wouldn't make sense with the She can
What allows us to say that shove in sentence (1) functions as a noun, but shoved in sentence (2) functions as a verb? The meaning of both sentences, after all, is essentially the same. And how do we account for verbs like hear or undergo?
The way I see this is that the noun has to be the subject . So shove is what's being given and when its used as shoved, it comes a verb
While strict prescriptivism has its advantages, it can be overwhelming to those who want to write freely without confinement to rules. Also, it can limit the artistic expression one may possess.
I think this is the main reason it takes people forever to write a great paper because they have to make sure they are using acceptable grammar
“On one hand, grammar rules are necessary for greater understanding and more effective communication.”
As it's also shown, it stands with getting a job or doing great on the SATS
Derivational affixes are affixes that when added to a word create a new word with a new meaning. They’re called derivational precisely because a new word is derived when they’re added to the original word, and many times these newly created words belong to a new grammatical category.
This makes sense because it's still the same category of what the word means.
This allows the child to understand that words begin with basic sound units such as /b/, /a/, /t/ in the word ‘bat’ are a part of a more complex, larger sound “chunks” or syllables (K12 Reader, 2019).
As a child, we connect the words with sounds to comprehend. In any charts, kids connect the sound the letter makes with the letter and word.
By the age of five, without developmental restrictions, a child would have learned how to speak a language.
What do you mean by development restrictions?
Minimal pairs are useful for linguists because they provide comprehension into how sounds and meanings coexist in language.
Does every sound connect to a meaning exactly? Could one sound have different meanings?
Furthermore, it can even analyze the distinction between distinctive accents
The way that I see this sentence is true because the slight difference is in the way we say different words
Phonetics involves the study of the way sound is produced by certain parts of the body.
This is interesting
All humans have a different way of pronouncing words that produce various sounds.
Does the way people pronounce the words make a difference in now they are seen?
Certain social circles expect you to follow the rules for table etiquette, and may exclude you if you violate them. Likewise, if you break prescriptive rules of language use, you will still be understood, but some may put you down as uneducated.
I think this is a perfect example because from what I’ve seen, if you don’t follow the standard rules of English, they do see you as an educated even though you could be saying the exact same thing but just in your own understanding and tone.
they typically want someone to tell them how to speak, in other words to prescribe a particular set of rules to follow, and expect a teacher or book to set forth those rules.
The way I see the difference between descriptive and prescriptive is that descriptive is the set of rules and prescriptive is how use the rules?
Can you ever remember a time when you were without language? Identity and language twine about each other so tightly that they are impossible to separate. Children of immigrant families, for example, often associate the language of their home with warmth and strong personal connections, with the deepest, private sense of who they are, in contrast to the formal public language of school and the outside world.
I believe we do use language as a way to Connect with our families, friends and others. With family, especially for me, Spanish is our main language and they can access to our routes and it’s easy to speak with one another especially when you have family who still lives in the country. You then go to speaking different forms of English with either friends, colleagues, professors and etc. That’s when you start to depict what type of language you use. When I’m with my friends, I use slang because that’s how we speak with one another.
they typically want someone to tell them how to speak, in other words to prescribe a particular set of rules to follow, and expect a teacher or book to set forth those rules.
The way I set descriptive and prescriptive part is by seeing that descriptive is the set of rules and prescriptive is how do you use the rules?
Grammar books like those you probably used in high school would dismiss this sentence as ungrammatical, telling you that ain’t is not a word, that me mustn’t be used in the subject of a sentence, and that you can’t use two negatives together.
This is so accurate. Most people speak this way and we are able to understand perfectly because of our surroundings and the way we adapted with our language. Unfortunately when people do speak this way, it’s always connected to your social class and economic class.
Children can learn any language they are exposed to.
I agree with the statement completely. When the child is born, they don’t know any languages. It’s easier for children to pick up as they grow the different languages surrounding them. Most children adapt to the language in their environment. So for example, I speak English and Spanish due to my environment. At home, it’s mostly Spanish. But, at school and around my friends it’s a mixture of English and Spanish. Mostly English.
They would use generic annotations like awk or choppy, which indicated the teacher’s disapproval without providing any precise indication of why the writer’s wording was problematic.
This would be a big issue for me during high school because I wouldn’t know how to better my writing with such simple words
I also devote some attention to considering how these grammatical topics appear on standardized tests such as the SAT and the ACT.
This becomes an interesting point because when writing in the SATS, they have it in such a structured way where the format can’t be changed in language or you automatically get points taken off
The only thing that distinguishes this case from the others is the lack of a determinative.
Determinatives are needed to break the nouns ?
Alison’s divorce,
So Alison's had turned into the D because of the 's coming into it. Making it possessive
If we apply the same tests to the singular form, this diligent worker, the results are be the same: this diligent worker is a phrase, and diligent worker is not.
This is interesting to know
the head is states.
Why is the head states ?
If you’re in that group, try expanding the frame sentence a bit to give yourself more context. For example, add (“in the courtyard”).
Would there be any sentences where context did not matter?
The first NP, teenagers is not receiving idiots.
So what Is the noun phrase receiving ?
(19) My wife fed the dog Tuesday morning.
Would the difference be that you don't know what was given?
?A raise was given the teachers by the school board.
This definitely does not sound proper at all.
Adjuncts can be added to any of the subtypes of verbs and don’t serve to distinguish one subtype from another.
Could these imply words like it and with? Like the minor words in sentences
(4) Bob kicked John.
When always reading sentences like this, I always confused the verb with it being an adjective
Linguists favor a different method for representing structure, known as a “tree diagram.”
I never understood tree diagrams and how they work
(22a) Samantha was expecting a phone call.(22b) Was Samantha expecting a phone call?
It shows here that it's alll about where you place a word that controls what's the subject
It is known as a subordinate clause.
I wonder that if the subordinate clause can be added onto another verb?
Apart from simply being a convenient way to name phrases, the relationship between the head word and the phrase type captures a significant fact of syntax: the category of the head word plays an important role in determining where in the sentence the phrase can go, as well as a variety of grammatical rules such as agreement
This is important to know because it's like they help one another in their own structure. They are able to feed off each world to follow the grammatical rules
a thorough understanding of syntax also gives you a way to take control of your own writing. When you understand how sentences are put together, you will be able to analyze your own writing and understand the structures that you have been using intuitively
I agree with this completely. Once you better understand how to write something and structure it, you have a greater purpose on how to get the work done and make it make sense
Language serves as a symbol of group identity. With the words we use and the way we pronounce them, we send signals to others—conscious and unconscious—about where we come from and how we see ourselves
When I read this, I think about slang. Every language has their own slang to it. Many people have accents. Why do we put down slang so much because of how it is written even though it contributes to someones identity and how they express themselves ?
Children can learn any language they are exposed to. Take a moment to consider how remarkable that ability is. If you put any infant born without developmental disabilities in any culture, that child will learn the language—or languages—he or she hears spoken.
I agree with this statement so much. Children are able to learn more than one language just by observing what they hear and see. In personal experience, I have seen my siblings since birth learn how to articulate in both English and Spanish. My little brother who is 8 is able to hold a good conversation in both languages..
If you are an ENG 270
testing out the annotation