Such discoveries may lead to new therapies
I find this very interesting and would love to research more about this. I wonder if they are in the works of developing new therapies and if so what are they?
Such discoveries may lead to new therapies
I find this very interesting and would love to research more about this. I wonder if they are in the works of developing new therapies and if so what are they?
Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution.”
I love this quote because of how true it is. Since everything in biology (and sciences) are always changing it makes sense that the only thing that makes sense is the light of evolution- which is talking about something that explains/shows all of these changes.
reshaping of an opposable thumb for tool manipulation
The opposable thumb is very useful in animals such as humans, monkeys, apes etc. so I am wondering if any other organisms will eventually evolve to develop the opposable thumb? For example, some cats are born with an extra digit so I am wondering if that could eventually be evolved to become opposable and increase their fitness.
These include genes for hairlessness, dark skin colour and abundant sweat glands, which originated during the last 2 million years of evolution within the genus Homo.12
What benefit does hairlessness have for us? Most other organisms have something covering the majority of their body such as hair, fur, feathers etc. so why did we evolve hairlessness?
Thus, there is stronger natural selection to maintain health at younger ages than at older ages, and this selection can favour genes that are beneficial in youth but detrimental in old age.
I find this very interesting- I never thought of it this way that younger ages are more naturally selected to maintain health compared to older ages. I guess it all loops back to an individuals fitness and the naturally instinct to survive and reproduce in order to pass on your genes to future generations.
The World Health Organization (WHO) lists about 12 000 diseases in its International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
How often is this number changing/ updating? Will the number ever go down meaning a disease no longer exists or will it only increase?
Fascinatingly, the Andean highlanders also acquired the ability to digest potatoes, a domesticated crop derived from wild tubers.
Since we can all digest potatoes- does that mean this was seen as an adaptation that would increase an individuals fitness and was passed down from generation to generation?
Looking at the bumps and shapes of a head does not help you understand the true genetic ancestry of a population—we have proved that you can have people who look very different but are closely related.
To what extent can the bumps and shapes of the head be different from one another but still be related?
The Meltzer and Willerslev team, which included dozens of researchers from institutions around the globe, also identified a previously unknown population with a distinctly Australasian genetic marker—a very surprising discovery.
Very interesting! I would like to look more into this unknown population. What more do we know about them if anything? Could some of their genes be found in humans today that we are unaware of?
These groups moved rapidly and unevenly, sometimes interbreeding with local populations, complicating the genetic—and historical—picture even further.
Where were these local populations that these groups interbred with? Are they still there today?
But as the new research released today suggests, it’s considerably more complicated than that. Humans, as we’re all too aware, aren’t so predictable.
I feel as though sometimes we forget that we are also a species just like any other organism on this Earth and we are still discovering information about our species just as we would with any other species.
Our understanding of how the Americas were first settled used to be simple. Today, it’s not.
This is what I love about science- the fact that there is always something more being discovered and there is always new and upcoming discoveries
But as cities become largerand increase in number, will more organismsadapt to an urban lifestyle?
I feel like because the development of urbanization does not seem to be slowing down anytime soon, more and more species will be able to adapt and evolve to survive in these urban environments.
Studies show that evolution in response to ur-banization can result from either new mutationsthat arise after urbanization, or ancestral substitu-tions that occurred before urbanization and exist asstanding genetic variation within populations.
I wonder if the adaptions certain species have made to adapt to their urban environment would continue to be passed down even if they went back to living in their natural habitat.
Many organisms have evolved adaptationsover long periods of time to coinhabit urban areas
Could sub-species be formed based on how each individual adapts to their new environment/ if the new environment splits their habitat?
A recent wave ofevidence shows that urbanization frequently af-fects adaptive (natural and sexual selection) andnonadaptive (genetic drift and gene flow) evolu-tionary processes in organisms as diverse as mi-crobes, plants, insects, fish, mammals, and birds
If certain animals can eventually evolve overtime to adapt to their habitat being changed by the urban environment, will marine animals eventually be able to adapt to their environment being changed by anthropogenic activity?
Rats,pigeons,bedbugs,andcockroachesarejust a few of the examples of organisms that haveadapted to live in and around human settlements
Do rats, pigeons, bed bugs and cockroaches now have a higher fitness because they have adapted to the urban environment? Would they have a lower fitness if they were brought back to their natural habitat compared to being in an urban environment?
As the global human population rises, theextent of urbanization will continue to grow
Is there a predicted percentage that this will rise to overtime? Will there be a point in time where urbanization will exceed the maximum capacity it can reach to and begin to create even more problems?
Darwin argues that the higher-quality pairs will produce more offspring than the lower-quality pairs.
If this is the case-would the "lower-quality" individuals slowly become 'extinct' because they are producing less and less offspring. If the higher quality individuals continue to reproduce more than the lower quality individuals, I believe that due to natural selection the lower quality individuals would not be as fit and would not be able to pass their genes on as easily- therefore would a species soon become a population of all high quality individuals?
But why would female preferences exist in the first place?
This is also a question I have- why is it that the majority of the time the females are choosing the males and not the other way around? Or why is it not an equal choice where it could be either the male or female choosing one another? Why did it evolve to be mainly females choosing males? Is this in some way more beneficial to the species?
Darwin (1871) correctly realized that sexual selection could be mediated by male-male combat or by a female’s choice of attractive males.
There are also cases where the female tries to attract the male by having the vibrant colors or patterns or using unique sounds to attract them. In most cases it is the male trying to attract the female but this is not always the case which I think is something important to note.
Darwin makes it clear that not all selection related to reproduction constitutes sexual selection, as primary sexual traits—like ovaries and testes—can evolve as a consequence of natural selection.
Natural selection is something that is touched upon in almost all biology classes including this one. This whole course has always involved the topic of natural selection and will continue to do so as we move into the topic of sexual selection. Sexual selection and natural selection can go hand in hand because sexual selection is used to attract mates for reproduction and if an individual is unable to attract a mate they will not pass down their genes to the next generation and therefore their traits may not be carried on.
This depends on the advantage which certain individuals have over other individuals of the same sex and species, in exclusive relation to reproduction.
This advantage can may be because one individual has brighter, bolder, color and patterns that attracts a mate more than other individuals. Another way to attract a mate would be through sound. These factors all contribute in creating reproductive isolation between different species
But the struggle will almost invariably be most severe between the individuals of the same species, for they frequent the same districts, require the same food, and are exposed to the same dangers.
This is known as intraspecific competition which is when organisms of the same species compete for limited resources.
Many cases are on record showing how complex and unexpected are the checks and relations between organic beings, which have to struggle together in the same country.
Many animals have a mutualism where they both benefit one another which is important in helping them survive by being able to live peacefully together while also benefiting from the other organism.
Climate plays an important part in determining the average numbers of a species
Climate can greatly affect an individuals ability to survive as harsh temperatures can lead to freezing to death, drought, lack of food and water, bush fires, etc. We are seeing this first hand in the Australian bushfires which is destroying animals, habitats, and resources.
If an animal can in any way protect its own eggs or young, a small number may be produced, and yet the average stock be fully kept up; but if many eggs or young are destroyed, many must be produced or the species will become extinct
Shows that it doesn't always matter how many young you produce but how well the young is taken care of in order for it to survive. Therefore the fitness of the organism proves itself to be very important so that their genes can be passed on and they can survive and continue on their population.
Every being, which during its natural lifetime produces several eggs or seeds, must suffer destruction during some period of its life
This is important because although it is unfortunate that every being will suffer destruction it is what keeps population sizes to an optimal number based on the amount of resources available. Natural selection ties into this because the organisms that are less fit will not survive during these periods of time where it faces destruction.
I use this term in a large and metaphorical sense, including dependence of one being on another, and including (which is more important) not only the life of the individual, but success in leaving progeny
This is essentially talking about the fitness of an organism which plays a huge role in natural selection
Evolutionary methods, particularly population genetics, are now used frequently in forensics and court cases to test the link of crime scene evidence to individuals
I did not realize population genetics was a part of evolutionary biology. I learned about population genetics in my genetics class last semester and would love to learn more about the connection between evolutionary biology and population genetics.
prediction of diseases that may emerge from recent host-shifts to humans
I find this very interesting and am also curious as to how much of this statement is true. I wonder how they are able to predict diseases and if they are able to predict them, why do new diseases continuously break out in populations without warnings such as the coronavirus. If they were really able to predict a disease they could start working on a vaccine for it before it rapidly spreads to numerous countries.
solutions to the many resulting problems may well require understanding evolutionary interactions among species and their mutual dependencies
This is very important to know as our world is dependent on solutions to these problems and we need to know as much information as we can in order to solve them. These problems can be things such as climate change which is a huge issue in our world today.
management of biological reserves and endangered species
I did not realize evolutionary biology can be applied to the management of endangered species. I find this very interesting because i am interested in conservation biology and specifically helping endangered species and learning how to manage and improve their conservation status.
evolutionary biology is extending further and further into biomedical research and nonbiological fields such as engineering, computer sciences, and even the criminal justice system
I think this is both a very interesting and very important statement. It shows that science can be applied and used in all different subjects and is very important in various fields. I am curious to know specifically how these individual fields apply evolutionary biology to their work.