To understand why autism is next to non-existent for the Amish, consider that the Amish have been “cut off” from American scientific and medical “progress” for centuries, thus they’
Exaggerated/minimized claims
Highlight where the author uses exaggerations/minimizations or seems to represent things in a proportional manner
Exaggerated/minimized claims
Does the author use exaggerations/minimizations or generally seems to represent situations and events in a proportional manner?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.17.01:Yes, there are a mix of exaggerations and minimizations", "1.17.02:Yes, there are exaggerations", "1.17.03:Yes, there are minimizations", "1.17.04:No, the text seems generally proportional (avoids exaggeration and minimization)" ]</div>Emotional valence
Is the language extremely negative, extremely positive, or somewhere in the middle?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.16.01:Extremely negative", "1.16.02:Somewhat negative", "1.16.03:Neither negative nor positive", "1.16.04:Somewhat positive", "1.16.05:Extremely positive" ]</div>e. In fact, the recent autism spectrum disorder (ASD) spike over the past two decades in the USA
Acknowledgement of uncertainty
Highlight uncertainty example
Acknowledgement of uncertainty
Does the author acknowledge uncertainty, or the possibility things might be otherwise?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.15.01:Yes", "1.15.02:Sort of", "1.15.03:No" ]</div>Confidence in claims made by sources
To what extent does the author's confidence in claims made by sources seem justified?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.14.01:Completely justified", "1.14.02:Mostly justified", "1.14.03:Somewhat justified", "1.14.04:Slightly justified", "1.14.05:Not at all justified" ]</div>Other types of sources
Are any experts, organizations, or studies separate from the central study quoted in the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.13.01:Yes", "1.13.02:No" ]</div>Types of sources
Does the article cite sources?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.08a.01:Yes", "1.08a.02:No" ]</div>Single study?
Is the article primarily about a single scientific study?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.07.01:Yes", "1.07.02:No" ]</div>The Amish, who don’t get vaccinated, rarely get autism, cancer, or heart disease – coincidence?
Clickbaitiness
What clickbait techniques does this headline employ?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.05.01:Listicle (\"6 Tips on ...\")", "1.05.02:Cliffhanger to a story (\"You Won't Believe What Happens Next\")", "1.05.03:Provoking emotions, such as shock or surprise (\"...Shocking Result\", \"...Leave You in Tears\")", "1.05.04:Hidden secret or trick (\"Fitness Companies Hate Him...\", \"Experts are Dying to Know Their Secret\")", "1.05.05:Challenges to the ego (\"Only People with IQ Above 160 Can Solve This\")", "1.05.06:Defying convention (\"Think Orange Juice is Good for you? Think Again!\", \"Here are 5 Foods You Never Thought Would Kill You\")", "1.05.07:Inducing fear (\"Is Your Boyfriend Cheating on You?\")", "1.05.08:Other" ]</div>The Amish, who don’t get vaccinated, rarely get autism, cancer, or heart disease – coincidence?
Clickbaitiness
Is the headline clickbaity?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.04.01:Very much clickbaity", "1.04.02:Somewhat clickbaity", "1.04.03:A little bit clickbaity", "1.04.04:Not at all clickbaity" ]</div>The Amish, who don’t get vaccinated, rarely get autism, cancer, or heart disease – coincidence?
Title Representativeness
Please describe other ways in which the title is not representative
Answer: [[test answer]]
The Amish, who don’t get vaccinated, rarely get autism, cancer, or heart disease – coincidence?
Title Representativeness
How is the title unrepresentative? (select all that apply)
Choices:
<div>[ "1.03.01:Title is on a different topic than the body", "1.03.02:Title emphasizes different information than the body", "1.03.03:Title carries little information about the body", "1.03.04:Title takes a different stance than the body", "1.03.05:Title overstates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.06:Title understates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.07:Other" ]</div>The Amish, who don’t get vaccinated, rarely get autism, cancer, or heart disease – coincidence?
Title Representativeness
Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div>Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>Exaggerated/minimized claims
Does the author use exaggerations/minimizations or generally seems to represent situations and events in a proportional manner?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.17.01:Yes, there are a mix of exaggerations and minimizations", "1.17.02:Yes, there are exaggerations", "1.17.03:Yes, there are minimizations", "1.17.04:No, the text seems generally proportional (avoids exaggeration and minimization)" ]</div>Emotional valence
Is the language extremely negative, extremely positive, or somewhere in the middle?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.16.01:Extremely negative", "1.16.02:Somewhat negative", "1.16.03:Neither negative nor positive", "1.16.04:Somewhat positive", "1.16.05:Extremely positive" ]</div>he fish is very nutritionally deficient and doesn’t contain omega-3 oils or other essential nutrients found in natural fish. It may be decent in taste, but the Basa fish is very dangerous for your health, which is why you should avoid it.
Acknowledgement of uncertainty
Highlight uncertainty example
Acknowledgement of uncertainty
Does the author acknowledge uncertainty, or the possibility things might be otherwise?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.15.01:Yes", "1.15.02:Sort of", "1.15.03:No" ]</div>Acknowledgement of uncertainty
Does the author acknowledge uncertainty, or the possibility things might be otherwise?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.15.01:Yes", "1.15.02:Sort of", "1.15.03:No" ]</div>Confidence in claims made by sources
To what extent does the author's confidence in claims made by sources seem justified?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.14.01:Completely justified", "1.14.02:Mostly justified", "1.14.03:Somewhat justified", "1.14.04:Slightly justified", "1.14.05:Not at all justified" ]</div>Other types of sources
Are any experts, organizations, or studies separate from the central study quoted in the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.13.01:Yes", "1.13.02:No" ]</div>er essential nutrients found in natural fish. It may be decent in taste, but the Basa fish is very dangerous for your hea
Organizations
Highlight organization
cted with antibiotics and hormones that are supposed to make the fish bigger. The meat was found to contain hormones that accelerate the growth and reproduction of the fish, and is then sold in partnership with big companies that have no regard for human health. The Basa fish is sold at a very low price which attracts super
Organizations
Highlight organization
polluted rivers in the world. The fish is cultivated in sewage pools which contain high levels of toxins and bac
Organizations
Highlight organization
The Basa fish ( Pangasius Fillets) is cultivated near the Mekong River in Vietnam, one of the most polluted rivers in the world. The fish is cultivated in sewage pools which contain high levels of toxins and bacteria that end up in the meat. Besides this, the meat has been found to contains heavy metals, chlorate, isomers, hexachlorobenz
Organizations
Highlight organization
Types of sources
Which of the following are cited?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.08.01:Experts", "1.08.02:Studies", "1.08.03:Organizations", "1.08.04:Other" ]</div>Types of sources
Does the article cite sources?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.08a.01:Yes", "1.08a.02:No" ]</div>Single study?
Is the article primarily about a single scientific study?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.07.01:Yes", "1.07.02:No" ]</div>NOT EAT THIS FISH, IT IS VERY DANGEROU
Clickbaitiness
What clickbait techniques does this headline employ?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.05.01:Listicle (\"6 Tips on ...\")", "1.05.02:Cliffhanger to a story (\"You Won't Believe What Happens Next\")", "1.05.03:Provoking emotions, such as shock or surprise (\"...Shocking Result\", \"...Leave You in Tears\")", "1.05.04:Hidden secret or trick (\"Fitness Companies Hate Him...\", \"Experts are Dying to Know Their Secret\")", "1.05.05:Challenges to the ego (\"Only People with IQ Above 160 Can Solve This\")", "1.05.06:Defying convention (\"Think Orange Juice is Good for you? Think Again!\", \"Here are 5 Foods You Never Thought Would Kill You\")", "1.05.07:Inducing fear (\"Is Your Boyfriend Cheating on You?\")", "1.05.08:Other" ]</div>NOT EAT THIS FISH, IT IS VERY DANGEROU
Clickbaitiness
Is the headline clickbaity?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.04.01:Very much clickbaity", "1.04.02:Somewhat clickbaity", "1.04.03:A little bit clickbaity", "1.04.04:Not at all clickbaity" ]</div>NOT EAT THIS FISH, IT IS VERY DANGEROU
Title Representativeness
How is the title unrepresentative? (select all that apply)
Choices:
<div>[ "1.03.01:Title is on a different topic than the body", "1.03.02:Title emphasizes different information than the body", "1.03.03:Title carries little information about the body", "1.03.04:Title takes a different stance than the body", "1.03.05:Title overstates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.06:Title understates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.07:Other" ]</div>NOT EAT THIS FISH, IT IS VERY DANGEROU
Title Representativeness
Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div>Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>ed or perhaps reversed slightly in the 21st century, but scientists believe the ice is still catching up to the higher temperatures.
Exaggerated/minimized claims
Highlight where the author uses exaggerations/minimizations or seems to represent things in a proportional manner
Exaggerated/minimized claims
Does the author use exaggerations/minimizations or generally seems to represent situations and events in a proportional manner?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.17.01:Yes, there are a mix of exaggerations and minimizations", "1.17.02:Yes, there are exaggerations", "1.17.03:Yes, there are minimizations", "1.17.04:No, the text seems generally proportional (avoids exaggeration and minimization)" ]</div>Emotional valence
Is the language extremely negative, extremely positive, or somewhere in the middle?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.16.01:Extremely negative", "1.16.02:Somewhat negative", "1.16.03:Neither negative nor positive", "1.16.04:Somewhat positive", "1.16.05:Extremely positive" ]</div>ckman, a lead researcher for Project Midas. “This is a big change. Maps
Acknowledgement of uncertainty
Highlight uncertainty example
Acknowledgement of uncertainty
Does the author acknowledge uncertainty, or the possibility things might be otherwise?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.15.01:Yes", "1.15.02:Sort of", "1.15.03:No" ]</div>Acknowledgement of uncertainty
Does the author acknowledge uncertainty, or the possibility things might be otherwise?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.15.01:Yes", "1.15.02:Sort of", "1.15.03:No" ]</div>Confidence in claims made by sources
To what extent does the author's confidence in claims made by sources seem justified?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.14.01:Completely justified", "1.14.02:Mostly justified", "1.14.03:Somewhat justified", "1.14.04:Slightly justified", "1.14.05:Not at all justified" ]</div>Other types of sources
Are any experts, organizations, or studies separate from the central study quoted in the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.13.01:Yes", "1.13.02:No" ]</div>nk of floating ice that weighs more than a trillion metric tons broke away from the Antarctic Peninsula, producing one of the largest icebergs ever recorded and providing a glimpse o
Expert sources
Highlight expert source
Types of sources
Which of the following are cited?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.08.01:Experts", "1.08.02:Studies", "1.08.03:Organizations", "1.08.04:Other" ]</div>Types of sources
Does the article cite sources?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.08a.01:Yes", "1.08a.02:No" ]</div>Single study?
Is the article primarily about a single scientific study?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.07.01:Yes", "1.07.02:No" ]</div>An Iceberg the Size of Delaware Just Broke Away From Antarctica
Clickbaitiness
What clickbait techniques does this headline employ?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.05.01:Listicle (\"6 Tips on ...\")", "1.05.02:Cliffhanger to a story (\"You Won't Believe What Happens Next\")", "1.05.03:Provoking emotions, such as shock or surprise (\"...Shocking Result\", \"...Leave You in Tears\")", "1.05.04:Hidden secret or trick (\"Fitness Companies Hate Him...\", \"Experts are Dying to Know Their Secret\")", "1.05.05:Challenges to the ego (\"Only People with IQ Above 160 Can Solve This\")", "1.05.06:Defying convention (\"Think Orange Juice is Good for you? Think Again!\", \"Here are 5 Foods You Never Thought Would Kill You\")", "1.05.07:Inducing fear (\"Is Your Boyfriend Cheating on You?\")", "1.05.08:Other" ]</div>An Iceberg the Size of Delaware Just Broke Away From Antarctica
Clickbaitiness
Is the headline clickbaity?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.04.01:Very much clickbaity", "1.04.02:Somewhat clickbaity", "1.04.03:A little bit clickbaity", "1.04.04:Not at all clickbaity" ]</div>An Iceberg the Size of Delaware Just Broke Away From Antarctica
Title Representativeness
How is the title unrepresentative? (select all that apply)
Choices:
<div>[ "1.03.01:Title is on a different topic than the body", "1.03.02:Title emphasizes different information than the body", "1.03.03:Title carries little information about the body", "1.03.04:Title takes a different stance than the body", "1.03.05:Title overstates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.06:Title understates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.07:Other" ]</div>An Iceberg the Size of Delaware Just Broke Away From Antarctica
Title Representativeness
Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div>Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>Exaggerated/minimized claims
Does the author use exaggerations/minimizations or generally seems to represent situations and events in a proportional manner?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.17.01:Yes, there are a mix of exaggerations and minimizations", "1.17.02:Yes, there are exaggerations", "1.17.03:Yes, there are minimizations", "1.17.04:No, the text seems generally proportional (avoids exaggeration and minimization)" ]</div>showing coconut oil increased LDL ("bad") cholesterol in seven out of seven controlled trials. Researchers didn't see a difference between coconut oil and other oils high in saturated fat
Emotional valence
Highlight where any language is extremely negative or extremely positive
Emotional valence
Is the language extremely negative, extremely positive, or somewhere in the middle?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.16.01:Extremely negative", "1.16.02:Somewhat negative", "1.16.03:Neither negative nor positive", "1.16.04:Somewhat positive", "1.16.05:Extremely positive" ]</div>Still, it might not be a bad idea to opt for vegetable oils or olive oil, Sacks said. Plus, coconut oil can still be an effective moisturizer or hair conditioner.
Acknowledgement of uncertainty
Highlight uncertainty example
Acknowledgement of uncertainty
Does the author acknowledge uncertainty, or the possibility things might be otherwise?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.15.01:Yes", "1.15.02:Sort of", "1.15.03:No" ]</div>Confidence in claims made by sources
To what extent does the author's confidence in claims made by sources seem justified?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.14.01:Completely justified", "1.14.02:Mostly justified", "1.14.03:Somewhat justified", "1.14.04:Slightly justified", "1.14.05:Not at all justified" ]</div>Other types of sources
Are any experts, organizations, or studies separate from the central study quoted in the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.13.01:Yes", "1.13.02:No" ]</div>Types of sources
Does the article cite sources?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.08a.01:Yes", "1.08a.02:No" ]</div>Single study?
Is the article primarily about a single scientific study?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.07.01:Yes", "1.07.02:No" ]</div>Coconut oil isn't healthy. It's never been healthy.
Clickbaitiness
What clickbait techniques does this headline employ?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.05.01:Listicle (\"6 Tips on ...\")", "1.05.02:Cliffhanger to a story (\"You Won't Believe What Happens Next\")", "1.05.03:Provoking emotions, such as shock or surprise (\"...Shocking Result\", \"...Leave You in Tears\")", "1.05.04:Hidden secret or trick (\"Fitness Companies Hate Him...\", \"Experts are Dying to Know Their Secret\")", "1.05.05:Challenges to the ego (\"Only People with IQ Above 160 Can Solve This\")", "1.05.06:Defying convention (\"Think Orange Juice is Good for you? Think Again!\", \"Here are 5 Foods You Never Thought Would Kill You\")", "1.05.07:Inducing fear (\"Is Your Boyfriend Cheating on You?\")", "1.05.08:Other" ]</div>Coconut oil isn't healthy. It's never been healthy.
Clickbaitiness
Is the headline clickbaity?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.04.01:Very much clickbaity", "1.04.02:Somewhat clickbaity", "1.04.03:A little bit clickbaity", "1.04.04:Not at all clickbaity" ]</div>Coconut oil isn't healthy. It's never been healthy.
Clickbaitiness
Is the headline clickbaity?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.04.01:Very much clickbaity", "1.04.02:Somewhat clickbaity", "1.04.03:A little bit clickbaity", "1.04.04:Not at all clickbaity" ]</div>Coconut oil isn't healthy. It's never been healthy.
Title Representativeness
Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div>Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>