Sometimes it is better to spell out what you refer to

It looks like closing parentheses here get italicized

I believe the use of scare quotes in these contexts is disfavored

I think this abbreviation is disfavored

I'm having a hard time parsing this sentence

Table 3.2 columns 4 and 6 it looks like the closing parentheses is systematically italicized

as far as anyone has been able to determine? as far as has been determined? as far as I have been able to determine? ...

Why abbreviate dialect names with a period?

"clitical" or "clitic"?

I prefer "as in (n)"

Do you mean they are the norm or that they prescribe something?

Are there different conventions about capitalization here? Check with Sebastian about which he wants applied. I won't comment on it further.

My comments about italicising and bracketing here apply throughout -- your system seems consistent, but it is not the one I am used to.

I'm not sure why this is in brackets.

I'm not sure why this is in italics

I'm not sure what exactly the brackets here and below indicate or why they're in italics.

Suggested revision: .... object. In the non-perfective categories, in contrast, it is ...

"as seen" ?

Maybe there are different conventions here?

Do you mean "from entirely"?

Again, here, do you mean SG, PL, M, and F to be italicized?

comma could go here

Do you mean for the Ms and Fs in this table to be italicized?

is the p usually capitalized here?

comma missing