projectron:\#id
prefix declarations are missing
projectron:\#id
prefix declarations are missing
They MAY use any resource or subject names.
Same remark as above (same sentence for Social Agents).
It MAY use any resource or subject names.
what is the purpose of his sentence? And what does it actually mean, anyway? I'm assuming that it may mean "The URI denoting the identity profile document MAY be any URI", but I am not entirely sure I'm correct. And if I am: * the term "use" us too vague * the distinction "resource or subject name" is weird
Social Agent
should be "Description of a Social Agent"
denoted
"described" would be more accurate that "denoted", IMO
necessitates out-of-band agreements between different applications
Isn't that always the case? Is an ontology not a form of out-of-band agreement?
it.
pas de point à la fin (homogénéité)
tasks
"task"
about
remplacer par "to measure"
context
be more specific (mention "type" or "typing")
translates
"translate" (no final "s")
requires
"requires you" (add "you")
“I don’t know what you mean by ‘glory,’” Alice said. Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. “Of course you don’t—till I tell you. I meant ‘there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!’” “But ‘glory’ doesn’t mean ‘a nice knock-down argument,’” Alice objected. “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.” “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”
Humpty Dumpty's theory of language and meaning :-)
Cat is an Animal and more, just as 'big is 'small and more.
Nice! I'll try to remember that, because indeed, this was counter-intuitive!
des informations et des outils numériques
Hypothesis est également un outil intéressant.
The application state is controlled and stored by the user agent
i.e. it(s the client's responsibility, rather than the servers...
Il faut implanter des règles
Je ne pense pas que cela soit contradictoire avec le modèle du bazar, qui ne signifie pas l'anarchie. De nombreux projets open-source, à commencer par Linux (qui a été l'inspiration principale dans la métaphore du bazar), évoluent de manière émergente mais avec des règles précises.
Je ne suis pas en faveur des cathédrales, mais pas non plus en faveur du bazar.
Allusion à la métaphore proposée par Eric Raymond dans son essai https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Cath%C3%A9drale_et_le_Bazar .
Pour faire court, la cathédrale représente une approche top-down et hiérarchique, le bazar représente une approche bottom-up, émergente et collaborative.
Nielson
Nelson (cf. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Nelson)
Nielson
Nelson (cf. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Nelson)
formerly www conference
no more dubdubdub :)
not or and
This makes no sense. Traditionally, 'and' has a higher precedence than 'or' -- and it is the case in Python as well.
Python Operators Precedence Example
This table is wrong! See https://docs.python.org/3/reference/expressions.html#operator-precedence for the correct precedence.
documentaire décentralisé, interconnecté, interopérable
Je ne comprends pas bien...
So what exactly does this mean for you?
Regarding Hypothesis, it is not clear to me to which extent its API is compliant with the W3C Annotation Protocol. I had a quick look at it and it seemed to me that there were differences, and the API documentation doesn't mention it at all...
aLDEAS : un langage de définition de systèmes d’assistance épiphytes
aLDEAS :
Wow, Hypothesis marche même sur des PDFs. :)
. FIGURE1–Processus d’adjonction d’un système d’assistance à une application existant
Mais pour l'instant, la seule manière d'annoter une image c'est de la sélectionner intégralement (comme du texte).
Web de données
Quand je clique sur un lien, je n'ai plus la barre d'outils pour annoter :-(
Pierre-Antoine Champin
C'est moi :-)