33(3) of Regulation 2016/679), the procedure for assessing and notifying data protection breaches personal data(Article 34 of Regulation 2016/679), procedures for keeping an internal register of data protection breaches (Article33 of Regulation 2016/679) and a register of processing activities and the scope of the register of categories ofprocessing activities (Article 30 of Regulation 2016/679

European Union

3. Bootcamps: Towards Circular Science Maastricht University

42.10.

are

Mexico

 However, in my view, I suspect that either the Court, or for that matter the EU legislature, might be obliged to revisit the scope of the GDPR one day. The current approach is gradually transforming the GDPR into one of the most de facto disregarded legislative frameworks under EU law. That state of affairs is not necessarily intentional. It is rather the natural by-product of the GDPR’s application overreach, which in turn leads to a number of individuals being simply in blissful ignorance of the fact that their activities are also subject to the GDPR.

Thus, even if one were to leave aside the ‘by automated means’ part of the definition of Article 2(1) of the GDPR, it is still rather clear that three documents taken out and copied from a case file before a national court form part of a filing system, in other words the case file itself.

whether centralised, decentralised or dispersed on a functional or geographical basis’.

P.O. Box 616 6200 MD Maastricht The Netherlands

explores