102 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2021
    1. Gulliver is resentful of going back, and when he does, he realizes he does not want to be around his own wife and child because they remind him of the Yahoos.

      Kind of sad that he left his pregnant wife to travel and now does not want to return to her and even finds her annoying. He also is not super fond of being around his own child, just wants to go back to the talking horses that are apparently better than his family.

    2. In part three, Gulliver sets sail again and is rescued by a floating Island named  “Laputa” after his ship was attacked by pirates and he was left stranded

      You would think he would give up on his adventures. Everything seems to go wrong in every adventure, but after he returns home, he always seems to go on another one despite what happened in the previous one. I would have given up after the first one lol.

    3. warring with the little Lilliputians over the proper method for cracking an egg

      This story seems pretty weird. First fighting over whether to wear low heeled or high heeled shoes, then someone being punished for putting out a fire with their urine, then warring over the proper method of cracking an egg?? Pretty interesting so far lol.

    4. Whigs and Tories

      Early activists in the colonies called themselves Whigs, seeing themselves as in alliance with the political opposition in Britain, until they turned to independence and started emphasizing the label Patriots. In contrast, the American Loyalists, who supported the monarchy, were consistently referred to as Tories.

    1. I do not pretend, in giving you the history of this Royal Slave, to entertain my reader with adventures of a feigned hero, whose life and fortunes fancy may manage at the poet’s pleasure; nor in relating the truth, design to adorn it with any accidents but such as arrived in earnest to him: and it shall come simply into the world, recommended by its own proper merits and natural intrigues; there being enough of reality to support it, and to render it diverting, without the addition of invention.

      This is Behn telling us that this is based off a true story. It's interesting that she starts off by explaining herself and her purpose for writing this story, because I feel like men do not really do that like a lot of women authors do. She probably felt like she had to explain herself from the very beginning or else people wouldn't understand the story or even keep reading it.

    2. Oroonoko decides to kill Imoinda and their unborn child to avoid future suffering, and plans for a revenge. After killing his beloved wife, however, his strength leaves him. His revenge plan falls short, and Oroonoko is tortured and killed.

      I was not expecting this tragic of an ending lol. I guess I can kind of see where he was coming from where he did not want his love and his child to suffer, but killing them was not the way to go about it. Imoinda could have helped him with his plans of revenge or he could have hidden her or something so she would not have to suffer.

    3. she was employed by King Charles II in secret service in 1666.

      This is impressive that she got this job. Women were discriminated against during this time and it was thought that they should stay in the home rather than work, so the fact that she got employed by the King is very impressive.

    4. the first English woman to make her living as a writer

      This is a big accomplishment. Most of the female writers that we've learned about so far did not become well known until after their passing. The fact that Aphra Behn was able to make a living off of her work as a writer is very impressive.

    1. Her blistering ambition juxtaposed with an aching insecurity make for a complex authorial voice that shines through in all her writing.

      Her personality is very interesting to me. She is very cocky yet very insecure at the same it. One minute, she was. defending herself and her writing from critics, the next minute, she was self-deprecating towards herself.

    2. she is often defending her right to publish and participate in contemporary intellectual exchange

      It is sad that women had to defend their right to write in this time period. If a man published something, he would not be questioned, but if a woman published something, she would automatically get attacked and questioned.

    3. mad, conceited and ridiculous woman

      I feel like men during this time thought that all a woman should be thinking about was her duties within her family. The fact that she was writing about her desires, personal circumstances, aspirations to fame, and opinions on everything from love to the scientific method probably just upset him, which is absolutely ridiculous.

    1. It is a rallying cry for women, urging them to reflect on their own worth and to question their place in society

      I like that she included this section. Women were seen as inferior in this time period and she is almost giving women a voice and urging them to break away from the social norms. If only this piece would have become popular as soon as it came out rather than hundreds of years later, history could be totally different today.

    2. In the original book, this segment was used as a closing statement.

      It is interesting that they moved this to the front of the book instead of the back. It is almost like they knew people were gonna be doubtful and not understand her arguments so they wanted them to read that section first.

    3. when she found herself pregnant by Hunsdon, he broke up with her and she was compelled to marry a cousin

      Her cousin or his cousin? I am guessing it is her cousin since they have the same last name, or that could just be because they were married lol. Also very sad that Hunsdon left her. You would think he would be mature enough to stay since he is 45 years older than her.

    4. Aemilia Lanyar’s father died when she was only seven and her mother when she was 18.

      This is very sad. I know the life expectancy was not as long back then and people had to grow up much faster than they do these days, but to lose both parents by the age of 18 is devastating.

    1. This preoccupation with reading is why he let his duties as Duke fall into the hands of Antonio. Prospero’s books are also why Prospero and Miranda survive on the island

      It is kind of ironic that the thing that got him banished to the island are also what helped him out of it. Without his books, he would have never been able to become Duke of Milan again.

    1. Are we born destined to be damned, or do our life choices affect our ultimate fate?

      I think this is an interesting question that I have never really thought about before. Are we in control of our own fate and our own salvation, or is everything already planned out for us? I would like to think that we are in control of our own fate.

    2. Doctor Faustus considers the question of whether the pursuit of salvation is worthwhile or better abandoned for the pursuit of pleasures in the here and now.

      This is still something that I feel a lot of people struggle with today. Do you follow God and have eternal life, or do you follow the world and have pleasures in this world but spend the rest of your life in Hell?

    3. and will end with Faust turning his soul over to the Devil to become eternally enslaved thereafter

      I wonder if Faust was fully aware of the bargain or if he was tricked into selling his soul to the Devil and becoming enslaved. If it were me, I would not trade knowledge for my soul if I was fully aware of the deal.

    4. Faust is the story of a man who falls into a depression as he becomes bored and unsatisfied with his life as a scholar

      It is interesting to me that depression was still a common feeling and condition back then. Depression is very prevalent today and this story even seems like it is something that could be written today.

  2. earlybritishlit.pressbooks.com earlybritishlit.pressbooks.com
    1. the transient nature of the material world is the most prevalent theme of the play

      This is still something that people struggle with today. People tend to focus on the material things of this world rather than focusing on God. Although material things may bring you happiness for a time, eternal life in heaven is far greater.

    2. Everyman

      I wonder if the title is Everyman because it is something that every man struggles with. Any human is going to struggle with the difference between good and evil and is going to be fascinated with the material things of this world, so naming the main character of the play and the play itself Everyman was an interesting choice for the author.

    3. must perform acts of kindness and charity throughout our lives

      It is interesting there is emphasis on the acts of kindness and charity in order to be in good standing for the final judgement. Must people push that faith will get you into heaven, but this play is pushing good works over faith.

    4. God is bothered by the way mankind has been living their lives—sinfully and without regard to the great sacrifices made by Christ on the cross

      I feel that this makes it a timeless piece of literature. People are always going to sin and are always going to forget the sacrifices that Christ made on the cross, so this play speaks to a very wide audience.

  3. Jun 2021
    1. And it fell on the youngest of them all

      I wonder if they would have still planned to kill the person who went to the store regardless of who it was. I feel like they wanted to keep the money for themselves so badly that they would have killed him no matter who it was.

    2. The two remaining men sit back, relax, and drink the poisoned wine

      This is pretty ironic. If the three men would have just split the money evenly, all would be well, but they had to be greedy and try to sabotage the others in order to keep it for themselves.

    3. The Pardoner consistently preaches that “Greed is the root of all evil” while selling indulgences, or pardons of sin, and keeping the money for himself

      This is quite sickening. He should not be preaching "Greed is the root of all evil" when he is being greedy himself. It is quite hypocritical.

    1. The tale starts off with this Knight who has raped a young woman and for some reason the Queen wants to give him a chance to redeem himself

      This is an interesting way to start a story. You would think the Queen would be more hard on the Knight since she is a woman herself and might feel for the young woman who was raped, but it was interesting that she gave him a chance to redeem himself.

    2. as property was passed down to sons even if their mothers were still alive

      This is really sad to me. Men were definitely seen as superior during this time and women really did not have a say in a whole that went on, especially when it came to finances and. property.

    3. The story provides insight on women’s roles in the Late Middle Ages when they could occupy only three stations in society: maiden, widow or wife

      There weren't many tales about women during this time, so this is pretty progressive for its time. I think it's sad that the only roles a woman could have in society was either maiden, widow, or wife. I am glad we have come a long way since then.

    1. Emelye prays to Diana (the goddess of animals, hunt, and nature) to remain unmarried

      This prayer kind of answers my previous questions about whether or not Emelye even wanted Palamon or Arcite. It appears she was not in love with either of them and did not want to get married.

    2. King Theseus

      King Theseus was the king of Athens and son of the god Poseidon. He is describes as very wise and virtuous, having conquered many kingdoms and won many battles. He is a man who holds great power and allows The Knight's Tale to progress and develop.

    1. devout but “humanly imperfect Christian”

      I like this viewpoint of Sir Gawain. It shows that even public figures or leaders or even people we look up to have flaws no matter their position. We have all sinned and fallen short from time to time, and this shows that perfectly. I like how the author didn't try to portray Sir Gawain as perfect.

    1. For such was the usage of our fathers in the days of this tale

      This is very sad to me. Fathers should be used for more than their wealth. But I like hoe Marie de France included "in the days of this tale," like she knew that things would change or that her stories would still be read to this day.

    2. Right joyous was the damsel to know that Milon’s love was tender as her own

      I am sure that the damsel was ecstatic when she got the message from Milon. This is still very relatable to stories that are told today. Girls still get happy when they find out that a boy likes them back, and they get happy when a boy wants to see them.

    3. most other writers would merely translate from one language to another

      I like how she went against the norm of her time. She sounds very original and unique, and in the above paragraphs it talks about how she used an octosyllabic French verse. This was not an easy thing to do, but you can tell that she enjoyed a challenge and did not like following the crowd.