2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2024
    1. One of my mantras about writing is that writing is thinking. Writing is simultaneously the expression and the exploration of an idea1. As we write, we are trying to capture an idea on the page, but in the act of that attempted capture, it’s likely (and even desirable) that the idea will change.

      While I read the whole piece, I find this is the main point. Time and time again, Warner mentions "writing is thinking," even in his other pieces of writing. Writing is changing, our ideas are changing, and that can take us to what we want to convey. "But the point I’m trying to make here is that all of this thinking matters even if it’s only experienced by me." We reach our goals when we start thinking about our writing, elaborating, and getting to where we want to go. It's a process.

    1. It’s why I continue to believe this technology is an opportunity for reinvention, precisely because it is a threat to the status quo.

      I find this interesting. I think Warner has a more assimilative perspective on ChatGPT. I say this because he mentions earlier on that the discussion more often than not turns to how we can prevent students from using AI, rather than accepting it, and trying to incorporate it. Teaching the students how to use it responsibly is what should be the focus, not banning the use of AI as a whole.