but by men doing more.
men need to be the ones starting to make changes of there is going to be real progress
but by men doing more.
men need to be the ones starting to make changes of there is going to be real progress
But this changes when they can’t rely on social supports such as paid family leave, subsidized child care, and flexible work arrangements
common theme - there needs to be legislation changes providing paid leave for men and women
gender inequality remains deeply protected by old-school social norms
it's the gender inequality at home that is in a way causing just as much damage as gender inequality in the workplace
Instead of focusing on how the unemployed woman could get her next job, the couples I talked with focused their attention on ensuring that the husband’s career was flourishing
why are women expected to always fill the supporting role?
emphasizing that his income alone is enough to support the family.
protecting his masculinity, even when that wasn't necessarily true
while men’s unemployment was framed as a grave problem in need of immediate rectification, women’s unemployment was not
because men are expected to earn the money
he more economically dependent men are on their wives, the less housework they do.
how does this make sense? does it happen subconsciously or on purpose?
couples often reframe the value of each spouse’s work to elevate the husband’s work as being more prestigious and downplaying the importance of the woman’s job.
despite the fact that they earn less
when wives are professionally successful, couples are often reluctant to acknowledge the woman’s status as the breadwinner.
not just the husbands but also the wives feel uncomfortable calling themselves the breadwinner - possibly because they don't want to feel that they are emasculating their husbands?
Although American mothers—including those with young children—are far more likely to be working now than in past decades, they spend more time on child care today than did moms in the 1960s
this is surprising - you'd think the more work they did outside the home, the less time they would be spending on child care
gender equality for women still lags in another realm: their own home.
main claim
When people move in together or get married, they become more insular
this is interesting - that getting married may actually make you more disconnected from others, while living alone leaves you more open to making those connections because you aren't expected to prioritize a single person
co-housing communities
this seems similar to when people lived in tribes, like the native americans
we are all looking for two kinds of things. One is what Brooks was emphasizing—connection, community, belongingness—and that’s important, but we also, all of us, have some craving for solitude, privacy, autonomy, time to ourselves
now that people aren't boxed in to the expectation of a nuclear family, they can create a family that is most comfortable for them
while people still want flexibility and some privacy, they are casting about for more communal ways of living, guided by a still-developing set of values.
what started the push toward wanting more communal family networks?
the proportion of households in the United States that were made up of married couples and children was less than one in five.
this was really surprising - the typical household has always been considered to be 2 parents living together married with kids, but in fact that type of household is actually atypical
parenting partnership: You have a pair of people, sometimes more than that, who live together and raise children, but what gets subtracted out is the romantic connection
this is so interesting to me, but sounds very doable - if anything it may be easier not having to balance a romantic relationship and raising kids
It used to be that these components all came packaged together
in a nuclear family, it was a specific order and specific steps to be achieved, very constraining and restricting
the answer might resemble the extended families and kinship networks that were more common in earlier eras
this can help people feel more connected and supported
stripping away these boundaries and revealing the complexity of life.
pandemic is breaking down the barriers or boxes people have made to keep their work and home life separate
These myths don’t address the quality of work or your ability to focus and think deeply.
that's true - someone could spend a lot of time producing work, but if its not quality work are they really a good worker
ideal-worker norms very much benefit employers
what are some ways that ideal-worker norms benefit employers?
So much of our guilt comes from the idea that we have multiple priorities. It’s probably healthy to have multiple priorities, but that’s not what our myths valorize.
idea that if you are the best at something, your whole life is dedicated to it, but this is paradoxical for working parents because they are expected to be the best at two things
where a lot of problems start—is when people conflate responsiveness with care and dedication
people assume that the other person has seen the message and so assume that if they respond they care, if they don't respond that they don't which isn't always true
these things become basic expectations
now what was before going above and beyond is just expected as everyone adjusts to the new technology - suddenly you are expected to do more and be more on top of it just because you can
The first step is that you get a new tool, and you choose to use it in a way that enhances your sense of self, or what’s important to you
makes sense - you want to use the new technology to make yourself the best blank/what you are expected to be
“spiral of expectations”
what is it
We have the ability to track our children’s phones, but the questions are: How much should I track? Is it for their safety? Is it just for my peace of mind? Do I actually have a clearer sense of their safety if I know where the blue dot is on a map?
parents having to figure out where to draw the line with technology - balance between caring for child's safety and giving them privacy and freedom
observed the daily lives of nine middle- to upper-income families
very small sample size - so is it reasonable to generalize to the rest of the population?
“ultimate body,” which is cultivated through diligent dieting and exercise, and doesn’t deteriorate with age
myth no. 3, but how does this relate to the first two and to parenting?
“perfect parent,” who “always puts family first.”
myth no. 2
“ideal worker,” who “has no competing obligations that might get in the way of total devotion to the workplace.”
myth no. 1
an inattention to race precludes local officials from seeing how such policies can overlook nonwhite groups that aren’t well-represented in politics.
because its not written into the legislation they can pretend it isn't happening and that they are enforcing the law equally
affirmative action for whites.
an almost hidden phenomenon - because whites inherently given more privilege, the law failing to recognize that and provide additional compensation for black people is actually affording white people more benefits and giving them a head start
the fact that the law wasn’t written with preexisting racial imbalances in mind meant that many non-white veterans were left without access to classic American paths to upward mobility.
because laws didn't specify not to discriminate and didn't take the possibility of racial bias into account, it actually allowed for discrimination to happen
often only for houses in predominantly black areas where property values were lower.
not afforded the same benefits despite falling under the same legislation
facilitated a wave of mostly white homeownership and the growth of the mid-20th-century middle class
further increasing socioeconomic gap between blacks and whites
implemented on the state level
main issue of this legislation seems to be that it wasn't enforced federally - allowed state legislators interpretation and loopholes
require that black veterans seeking college degrees enroll at historically black colleges, which were almost always underfunded and had few of the resources that primarily white colleges did
given the same benefit in name, but wasn't equal
legislation written with language that wasn’t explicitly discriminatory. And yet, these policies did not work for everyone: It was primarily white Americans who were able to benefit from them once they were put in place
despite not being blatantly prejudiced, the execution and enforcement of this legislation was carried out in a way that only benefitted white people - identity politics in disguise
move toward policies that direct attention away from race and instead focus broadly on economic mobility
this wouldn't be good because race is a factor in one's ability to be economically mobile
“identity politics”
term that describes a political approach wherein people of a particular religion, race, social background, class or other identifying factor form exclusive socio-political alliances, moving away from broad-based, coalitional politics
this approach would alienate some largely white swaths of the country that would be crucial to the party’s future electoral success
concerned about offending some racist white voters who may vote left
We need a wider discussion of how we have naturalized logics and practices of carcerality in our communities and classrooms,”
naturalized logic and practice or carcerality - results of socialization
U.S. society doesn’t see black children as children, but as “thuggish” and “predatory”
label can become internalized - if they are already assumed to be one way why try to be better
“Certain children in our culture get to be children, and others don’t.”
minority children seen as a problem to be prevented (focused on being kept out of trouble, assume they will develop into a thief or criminal)
creating more relaxed environments in her schools
preventative practice - creating an atmosphere that discourages violence
goal is for students to talk through their problems and make amends, instead of receiving detention, suspension, or worse.
instead of just being punished with no explanation, having a more democratic approach can help students and teachers fix the problem and prevent future infractions instead of simply scaring student or making them mad
Students who are suspended just once are more likely to ultimately repeat a grade or drop out of school, and to later be in contact with a county’s juvenile probation department.
serious long term consequences for minority groups - can contribute to lower socioeconomic status later in life
schools with SROs had five times as many arrests for “disorderly conduct” compared to schools without these officers
SROS likely doing more harm than good
punishes people for minor offenses, like vandalism, to supposedly create an orderly atmosphere and deter more serious crime.
probably has opposite effect - once students take on the label of criminal they may internalize it and commit more serious crimes in the future
black students are 4.5 times more likely to be suspended than white students
result of subconscious bias
This kind of discipline raises the likelihood that students will embark on a path to prison, dubbed the “school-to-prison pipeline.
goes along with labeling theory
Race only requires some good guys with big guns looking for a reason.
race is created to be used as justification for separation and discrimination
Over history of race has taken geography, language, and vague impressions as its basis.
not just ethnicity
The reasons for that take us right back to fact of race as a social construct.
I don't consider myself African American despite being part African American, because race is a social construct and not just ethnicity/lineage
It is no more legitimate to ask "Is the black race dumber than then white race?" than it is to ask "Is the Jewish race thriftier than the Arab race?"
we have been socialized to think that it is normal to compare black to whites, but see comparing other "races" against each other as not normal
sought to delineate racial difference through head-type:
defining race in a different way, instead of lineage, on physical traits as "proof"
justifying secession on the grounds of irreconcilable ethnic differences between Southern and Northern whites.
race is almost always come up with and used as an excuse to justify divisions
no coherent, fixed definition of race actually exists
why the studies done on it are all, to a degree, flawed
What do you mean by race?"
possible to have different definitions
Many have no trouble establishing their identities via their families, religions, social lives, or careers,
how do they hold onto this despite the rapidly changing world?
a way to prove to themselves and to others that a changing world is no match for them
proof that they are handling it
Body art has taken on a greater significance, and people want their ink to say something about who they are
it's very specific, stakes are high when it is a literal defining part of you
signaling individuality in the same ways a birthmark or scar might
except with a tattoo you have control over the individuality you are signaling
traditional model of spending a lifetime with one employer has eroded
this and the following two highlights show why millennials feel less secure in their identities, they can't tie it to a job or a larger part of a widespread culture, so they tie it to a physical mark on their bodies
Tattoos, recent research suggests, don’t just express identity: They help define it.
main idea/claim of article
part of what makes them so meaningful is the degree of sacrifice involved in the process
pain is meaningful - that you suffered to get it
About half of the inked-up population has between two and five, and 18 percent have six or more
why is this? heard somewhere that getting one is addicting - once you start you can't stop/just want more. is it because it's so grounding? is it something about the experience?
Without access to many of the anchors their parents had to create their personal myths
why don't they have access to those other anchors?
personal myth
a person's own idea of their identity/who they are in the past/present/future
what we found is that we were in this modern era where people did know who they were
tattoo is grounding - physical depiction of an identity when a person feels unsure about theirs
the objects with which we fill our homes play a vital role in how we construct our sense of self
our personal objects not only impact how others see us, they impact how we see and define our own identities
Every personal item has a story behind it
and we can't assume stories by merely viewing
Big Five personality traits
type of personality test testing for specific levels of different traits
unconscious behavioral residue
cues left behind as a result of our habits and behaviors
feeling regulators
items serving emotional needs
conscious identity claims,
things we choose based on how we want others to perceive us
Physical attractiveness, race, gender, facial symmetry, skin texture, or facial expressions and body language
how we gather physical impressions from others
cue utilization
relying on cues to make instantaneous judgements about others
how sexuality intersects with gender, race, ethnicity and age to better understand the shifting landscape of sexual identities and contemporary systems of social inequality
main idea/claim of article
instance, qualitative analysis of interviews with women of color over time
answers above question
most effective sociological analyses of these issues will require mixed-methods approaches that simultaneously qualitatively measure how individuals think about dimensions of sexuality
how would we do this?
the very object of their study is “on the move.
maybe means that it is always changing, as in the definitions are always shifting and expanding?
Among this age group, there are almost as many bisexual-identifying women as there are gay men, bisexual men, and lesbian women combined!
why?
bisexual is now a more prevalent identity than lesbian
why?
“bisexual” is often presented as more nebulous than lesbian, gay, or straight classifications.
what does this mean?
bisexual had become the more prevalent sexual minority identity
because bisexual acknowledges more of a spectrum - not boxed into "only gay" or "only straight," definition is more flexible so can apply to more people
sexual minority identities are growing rapidly among young adults
why? maybe because more people are being open about it - they feel they will be more likely to be accepted? passage of laws promoting equality (like same sex-marriage)?
ame-sex sexual identities, as opposed to same-sex behaviors or desires, yields the most conservative estimates of the size of the LGB population
this makes a lot of sense - not everyone identifies with how they actually behave
not everyone understands sexuality and their own sexuality(ies) in precisely the same ways
everyone has different definitions - makes it difficult to categorize
dimensions do not always line up neatly
not black and white, and depends on people's level of comfort/openess if what they want lines up with what they do. or what they do may not necessarily reflect what they think they identify with, depending on their own personal definition
Sexualities are composed of (among other things) desires, acts or behaviors, and identities
many different factors go into it
how sexuality is being defined
definition/description of what's being asked can heavily skew survey answers - fault in research method
Estimating the size of sexual minority populations is challenging
because in order to estimate the size, you have to put people in boxes - opposite mentality of thinking of it as a spectrum
complicated by how sociologists often measure and make sense of sexual minority identities
is this saying that sociologists are doing it wrong?
some new trend among young people
discrepancy between younger and older generations - that sexuality can just be a trend, something that is "in" and "cool"
not conceived of as “our” children
idea that black people are separate or other, not part of the group
“conundrum of privilege.
don't know how to be a good parent while also being a socially conscious citizen
Privileged parents have the power, autonomy, time, and resources to, for instance, attend school-district meetings
PTA take over
some parents actually have the power to make it so
socioeconomic disparity among races gives some parents and families more power to get there children the very best, while black families can be left behind
ver-policed,
often get in more trouble for misbehaving despite the fact that they don't necessarily misbehave more - labeling theory
Teachers’ biases against black students
can be outright or unrecognized and unconcious
housing segregation and unequal funding
redlining in baltimore and elsewhere - not enough resources for gifted programs in schools with primarily black students
magnet students, who are mostly white and Asian, take classes on the second floor, and the LBJ students, who are majority black and Latino, take classes on the floor below
physically separated - like having two different segregated schools in the 1950s with separate facilities and teachers
separate but not equal
created a school within a school at Columbia High School
cousin's school!!!
racialized tracking
racialized tracking = students of color aren't offered same educational opportunities and therefore set up to struggle socioeconomically
tasked with challenging presumably smart students with acceleration and extra enrichment activities
gifted and talented programs used to segregate white from black kids - white kids are "gifted" while black kids kept in grade level classes
possibly contributes to racial economic inequality further down the road