• 3rd annotation: Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy/ Abortion

• Gordon, John-Stewart. “Abortion | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” Three Views on Abortion, Mar. 2020, www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1a.

• https://www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1a

• Evidence: “This view also faces severe problems; for example, it is not at all clear where the morally relevant difference is between the fetus five minutes before birth and a just born offspring.” (Gordon 1).

• The article explains that pro-life people believe here is a difference between a fetus and a newborn baby. After the fetus is born, they become are humans and have the right to live.

• Now the character is explaining that only after the fetus becomes a newborn they can be considered a human that has a right to live which shows the opposite side when exactly do pro-lifers believe someone has a right to life so it gives the full picture on this matter.

• 9th annotation: Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/ Ethics in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism

• “Ethics in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).” Ethics in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism , 1 Feb. 2017, plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-indian-buddhism.

• https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-indian-buddhism/

• Evidence: “Today, a woman might be informed by her doctor that the fetus she is carrying suffers from a severe genetic abnormality; if she gives birth, her baby will live for a few days or a few months in great pain before its inevitable early death.” ( 1)

• The article explains how it’s the women’s choice whether to abort a child if they think that the child will suffer in life. The fetus has no say in this because the mother knows best.

• To me, I wanted to add this question because even though a lot of pro-choice people believe this is true, a lot of people still have to think twice about this question when its thrown at them. I wanted the readers to suddenly think about the truthness of that statement. It kind of makes the reader think and feel like they are on both sides of the matter.

• As an author, I was shocked when I read this fact and I actually asked some people who are pro-life and they said that they actually never thought about that but it kind of makes sense. To me, this doesn’t make sense at all because how would a person know what another person’s life is going to be like or how they’ll end up?. but I had to mention it because it is a part of what many pro-lifers believe in.

5th annotation: AllSides/ New Zealand Passes Historic Law to Decriminalize Abortion

• Reuters. “New Zealand Passes Historic Law to Decriminalize Abortion.” Https://Www.Nytimes.Com/#publisher, 18 Mar. 2020, www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/03/18/world/asia/18reuters-newzealand-abortion.html.

• https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/03/18/world/asia/18reuters-newzealand-abortion.html

• Evidence: “For over forty years abortion has been the only medical procedure considered a crime in New Zealand. But from now abortions will be rightly treated as a health issue,” (Reuters 1).

• This article explains why and how abortion should be considered to be a health issue. It's not murder so it should not be considered as a crime.

• This is one of the main points about abortion that I had to add. The characters had to talk about how abortion is considered, to many, a crime. I wanted to get the pro-choice character to mention how that differs in his opinion and give his view on it.

• As an author who is pro-life, I wonder a lot about if abortion has anything to do with the woman’s health and that’s why I wanted to mention in the piece for people who have the same thoughts as me.

• 7th annotation: AllSides/ In Supreme Court Clash Between Elites and Pro-Lifers, The Peaceful Will Win

• “In Supreme Court Clash Between Elites and Pro-Lifers, The Peaceful Will Win.” CBN News, 18 Mar. 2020, www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2020/march/in-supreme-court-clash-between-elites-and-pro-lifers-the-peaceful-will-win.

• https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2020/march/in-supreme-court-clash-between-elites-and-pro-lifers-the-peaceful-will-win

• Evidence: “The activists spoke of abortion as a sacred right, untouchable by regulation and oversight, and an act of empowerment for a woman.” (Rose 1).

• I took from this article that it’s a way of empowering women into feeling like they actually have control over their life and body because many women feel like they don’t have that right or control over their life.

• I wanted to add this to my paper because it mentioned something that I really never thought about when it comes to allowing women to abort. So I thought it was interesting to add and I felt like many people, like me, didn't really see it in that light.

• As an author, I myself, alongside the reach I made, I noticed that many people support abortion simply because it gives more rights to a woman. Therefore, I had to mention it in the piece because it’s the reasoning behind many people deciding to be pro-choice.

• 6th annotation: AllSides/ Biden Misleads on His Previous Support for the Hyde Amendment

• New, Michael. “Biden Misleads on His Previous Support for the Hyde Amendment.” National Review, 18 Mar. 2020, www.nationalreview.com/corner/biden-misleads-on-his-previous-support-for-the-hyde-amendment.

• https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/biden-misleads-on-his-previous-support-for-the-hyde-amendment/

• Evidence: If “we’re going to have public funding for health care along the line,” abortion cannot be excluded.” (New 1).

• This article explains how being pregnant and/or having a baby affects women’s health mentally and physically. If it affects it in a negative way then abortion is needed/ justified.

• This is yet another point why some people are with abortion. I wanted to mention as many things as I needed to kind of wrap all of the facts together. Seeing that the women could get physically and/or mentally hurt is a huge deal to why many are with abortion. It's one of the main points that have to be mentioned to fully have an understanding of where they, the pro-choice people, are coming from.

• As an author, I wanted to explain a bit about how it can actually harm a woman. Because I already introduce the idea that it can harm women, I have to give at least some explanation on why that can be true. And to be honest, I kind of expected it so I wasn’t surprised that much by this reasoning on why abortion should be justified.

4th annotation: Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy/ Abortion

• Gordon, John-Stewart. “Abortion | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” Three Views on Abortion, Mar. 2020, www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1a.

• https://www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1a

• Evidence: “They claim that human personhood begins immediately after birth or a bit later (Singer). Thus, they consider the relevant date is at birth or a short time later (say, one month).” (Gordon 1).

• The article explains the pro-choice side’s stance on whether a fetus is considered to have personhood. The pro-choice people's stance is that the fetus is not considered to have personhood.

• This is a continuation of the last point the character made about a fetus not having personhood. This shows when pro-choice people believe a human has a right to life.

• As an author, I wanted to give the readers more details about what exactly do pro-choice people believe in. even if pro-life people don’t agree with their opinions and explanations at all, it still makes the reader have a better understanding of their opinion.

• 2nd annotation: Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy/ Health Care Ethics

• Taylor, Stephen C. “Health Care Ethics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” Human Life: Abortion, Mar. 2020, www.iep.utm.edu/h-c-ethi/#SSH4bi.

• https://www.iep.utm.edu/h-c-ethi/#SSH4bi

• Evidence: “the question of whether the act of abortion is also an act of murder and on the question of whether a fetus has a right to life." ( Taylor 1).

• The article says that people who are with the idea of abortion think that a fetus does not have any rights to live because it’s not considered a human yet.

• This is not the only article I read that talked about whether the fetus has personhood or not. This is basically one of the things that determine whether the fetus has a right to live or not. pro-choice people believe that they don’t have personhood which is a big factor in why they think it’s okay to abort a fetus and why it’s not considered "murder".

• As an author who is focusing on a character who has the opposite point of view to mine. This was quite shocking. I actually found tons of websites that talked about this statement as well. I was really shocked because it really doesn’t make any sense to me. Fetuses are still people.

• 11th annotation: Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/ Feminist Perspectives on Reproduction and the Family

• “Feminist Perspectives on Reproduction and the Family (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)”---. Feminist Perspectives on Reproduction and the Family, 21 Oct. 2013, plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-family.

• https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-family/

• Evidence: “Roe v Wade (1973) granted women the right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy, based on an implicit fundamental right to privacy.” (1).

• Pro-choice poepl believe that abortion is a women’s right to privacy.

• It's supporting and giving more meaning and explanation to the statement prior to this one.

• As an author, I couldn't really understand what they meat by privacy, so I conducted more research and I don't agree with women’s bodies being part of their privacy when it comes to abortion and someone else’s life.

• 12th annotation: Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

• “Moral Motivation (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).” Moral Motivation, 7 July 2016, plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-motivation.

• https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-motivation/

• Evidence: “Thomson, in contrast, believes that abortion is morally permissible.” (1).

• Based on pro-choice people’s moral judgment, abortion is morally permitted

• Yet another controversial statement because at the end of the day its everyone’s own judgment and opinion on whether something is the wrong or right so I wanted to add this as a reminder that that’s, sadly, how life works.

• As an author, I wanted to conclude this whole scene by saying how this is based on moral judgment. From all the research I did, I realized that people were deciding whether their pro-life or pro-choice based on their own morals and I believe that is very true because my decision to be pro-life is also based entirely on my own morals.

• 10th annotation: Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/ Feminist Perspectives on Reproduction and the Family

• “Feminist Perspectives on Reproduction and the Family (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).” Feminist Perspectives on Reproduction and the Family, 21 Oct. 2013, plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-family.

• https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-family/

• Evidence: “If women have rights over their own bodies, then they have rights not to have their bodies used by others against their will.”

• This article is talking about how women have a right to do whatever they want to do with their own bodies. Thus allowing abortions to happen if the women want to.

• Now I wanted to add this because the ending was near so I wanted the pro-choice character to show his opinion on how the world is.

• As an author, I wanted my character to just straight-up to give their opinion on the world as a pro-lifer. Pro-lifers often believe that women need more rights and this is just one of the rights they need. Even though I don’t agree that this should be considered "their right', I had to mention it because I am talking about their point of view as pro-lifers.

• 8th annotation: Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy/ Abortion

• “Abortion | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” The Modified Standard Argument, Mar. 2020, www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1c.

• https://www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1c

• Evidence: “That even if the fetus is a person, abortion may be justifiable in many cases,” (Gordon 1).

• Pro-choice people agree that abortion is justified even if the theory of a fetus having the right to live is true.

• At this point, I thought it was important to re-mention what the character thought from the very beginning. It’s just the base or the overall opinion to pro-choice people on this matter.

  • As an author, I wanted to bring the whole idea back to it being a "women's life" concern for pro-choice people. My opinion on this is that yes, it is the woman’s life, but that’s not the full story.

• 3rd annotation: Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy/ Abortion

• Gordon, John-Stewart. “Abortion | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” Three Views on Abortion, Mar. 2020, www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1a.

• https://www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1a

• Evidence: “This view also faces severe problems; for example, it is not at all clear where the morally relevant difference is between the fetus five minutes before birth and a just born offspring.” (Gordon 1).

• The article explains that pro-choice people believe here is a difference between a fetus and a newborn baby. After the fetus is born, they become are humans and have the right to live.

• Now the character is explaining that only after the fetus becomes a newborn they can be considered a human that has a right to live which shows the opposite side when exactly do pro-choice people believe someone has a right to life so it gives the full picture on this matter.

• As an author, I felt like anyone who’s reading up until now needs an explanation on what is the difference between a fetus and a person, at least to people who are pro-choice, because many people still do consider fetuses as people and wouldn’t understand what pro-choice people’s believe without a more detailed explanation.

1st source: AllSides

• 1st annotation: New Zealand House Passes Bill Legalizing Abortion

• Evans, Zachary. “New Zealand House Passes Bill Legalizing Abortion.” National Review, 19 Mar. 2020, www.nationalreview.com/news/new-zealand-house-passes-bill-legalizing-abortion.

• https://www.nationalreview.com/news/new-zealand-house-passes-bill-legalizing-abortion/

• Evidence: “I will feel proud to have done my bit to stand up for the women of New Zealand,” Adams said." (Evans 1)

• This article was talking about how it's the women’s right to have an abortion. That's why they legalized it in New Zealand. Plus, anyone who helped in this process felt happy and proud of doing so since its obviously the right thing to do.

• I chose this statement to add to my paper because it talked about one of the main points or the base of people who are pro-choice.

• As the author, when I read this during my research I thought this was one of the first points that should be mentioned because I feel like it's one of the biggest reasons anyone would think about getting an abortion. At least, that’s what I learned through my research that really helped me organize the order of this plot.

• 11th annotation: Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/ Feminist Perspectives on Reproduction and the Family

• “Feminist Perspectives on Reproduction and the Family (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)”---. Feminist Perspectives on Reproduction and the Family, 21 Oct. 2013, plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-family.

• https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-family/

• Evidence: “Roe v Wade (1973) granted women the right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy, based on an implicit fundamental right to privacy.” (1).

• Pro-abortions believe that abortion is a women’s right to privacy.

• It's supporting and giving more meaning and explanation to the statement prior to this one.

• 12th annotation: Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

• “Moral Motivation (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).” Moral Motivation, 7 July 2016, plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-motivation.

• https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-motivation/

• Evidence: “Thomson, in contrast, believes that abortion is morally permissible.” (1).

• Based on pro-abortion people’s moral judgment, abortion is morally permitted

• Yet another controversial statement because at the end of the day its everyone’s own judgment and opinion on whether something is the wrong or right so I wanted to add this as a reminder that that’s, sadly, how life works.

• 10th annotation: Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/ Feminist Perspectives on Reproduction and the Family

• “Feminist Perspectives on Reproduction and the Family (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).” Feminist Perspectives on Reproduction and the Family, 21 Oct. 2013, plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-family.

• https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-family/

• Evidence: “If women have rights over their own bodies, then they have rights not to have their bodies used by others against their will.”

• This article is talking about how women have a right to do whatever they want to do with their own bodies. Thus allowing abortions to happen if the women want to.

• Now I wanted to add this because the ending was near so I wanted the pro-abortion character to show his opinion on how the world is.

• 9th annotation: Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/ Ethics in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism

• “Ethics in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).” Ethics in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism , 1 Feb. 2017, plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-indian-buddhism.

• https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-indian-buddhism/

• Evidence: “Today, a woman might be informed by her doctor that the fetus she is carrying suffers from a severe genetic abnormality; if she gives birth, her baby will live for a few days or a few months in great pain before its inevitable early death.” ( 1)

• The article explains how it’s the women’s choice whether to abort a child if they think that the child will suffer in life. The fetus has no say in this because the mother knows best.

• To me, I wanted to add this question because even though a lot of pro-abortionists believe this is true, a lot of people still have to think twice about this question when its thrown at them. I wanted the readers to suddenly think about the truthness of that statement. It kind of makes the reader think and feel like they are on both sides of the matter.

• 8th annotation: Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy/ Abortion

• “Abortion | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” The Modified Standard Argument, Mar. 2020, www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1c.

• https://www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1c

• Evidence: “That even if the fetus is a person, abortion may be justifiable in many cases,” (Gordon 1).

• Pro-abortion agree that abortion is justified even if the theory of a fetus having the right to live is true.

• At this point, I thought it was important to re-mention what the character thought from the very beginning. It’s just the base or the overall opinion to pro-abortionists on this matter.

• 7th annotation: Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy/ Abortion

• Gordon, John-Stewart. “Abortion | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” Three Views on Abortion, Mar. 2020, www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1a.

• https://www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1a

• Evidence: “They claim that human personhood begins immediately after birth or a bit later (Singer). Thus, they consider the relevant date is at birth or a short time later (say, one month).” (Gordon 1).

• The article explains the pro-abortion side’s stance on whether a fetus is considered to have personhood. The pro-abortion stance is that the fetus is not considered to have personhood.

• This is a continuation of the last point the character made about a fetus not having personhood. This shows when pro-abortionists believe a human has a right to life.

• 6th annotation: Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy/ Abortion

• Gordon, John-Stewart. “Abortion | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” Three Views on Abortion, Mar. 2020, www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1a.

• https://www.iep.utm.edu/abortion/#SH1a

• Evidence: “This view also faces severe problems; for example, it is not at all clear where the morally relevant difference is between the fetus five minutes before birth and a just born offspring.” (Gordon 1).

• The article explains that pro-abortion people believe here is a difference between a fetus and a newborn baby. After the fetus is born, they become are humans and have the right to live.

• Now the character is explaining that only after the fetus becomes a newborn they can be considered a human that has a right to live which shows the opposite side when exactly do pro-abortionist believe someone has a right to life so it gives the full picture on this matter.

• 5th annotation: Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy/ Health Care Ethics

• Taylor, Stephen C. “Health Care Ethics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” Human Life: Abortion, Mar. 2020, www.iep.utm.edu/h-c-ethi/#SSH4bi.

• https://www.iep.utm.edu/h-c-ethi/#SSH4bi

• Evidence: “the question of whether the act of abortion is also an act of murder and on the question of whether a fetus has a right to life." ( Taylor 1).

• The article says that people who are with the idea of abortion think that a fetus does not have any rights to live because it’s not considered a human yet.

• This is not the only article I read that talked about whether the fetus has personhood or not. This is basically one of the things that determine whether the fetus has a right to live or not. pro-abortionists believe that they don’t have personhood which is a big factor in why they think it’s okay to abort a fetus and why it’s not considered "murder".

• 4th annotation: AllSides/ Biden Misleads on His Previous Support for the Hyde Amendment

• New, Michael. “Biden Misleads on His Previous Support for the Hyde Amendment.” National Review, 18 Mar. 2020, www.nationalreview.com/corner/biden-misleads-on-his-previous-support-for-the-hyde-amendment.

• https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/biden-misleads-on-his-previous-support-for-the-hyde-amendment/

• Evidence: If “we’re going to have public funding for health care along the line,” abortion cannot be excluded.” (New 1).

• This article explains how being pregnant and/or having a baby affects women’s health mentally and physically. If it affects it in a negative way then abortion is needed/ justified.

• This is yet another point why some people are with abortion. I wanted to mention as many things as I needed to kind of wrap all of the facts together. Seeing that the women could get physically and/or mentally hurt is a huge deal to why many are with abortion. It's one of the main points that have to be mentioned to fully have an understanding of where they, the pro-abortionist, are coming from.

3rd annotation: AllSides/ New Zealand Passes Historic Law to Decriminalize Abortion

• Reuters. “New Zealand Passes Historic Law to Decriminalize Abortion.” Https://Www.Nytimes.Com/#publisher, 18 Mar. 2020, www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/03/18/world/asia/18reuters-newzealand-abortion.html.

• https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/03/18/world/asia/18reuters-newzealand-abortion.html

• Evidence: “For over forty years abortion has been the only medical procedure considered a crime in New Zealand. But from now abortions will be rightly treated as a health issue,” (Reuters 1).

• This article explains why and how abortion should be considered to be a health issue. It's not murder so it should not be considered as a crime.

• This is one of the main points about abortion that I had to add. The characters had to talk about how abortion is considered, to many, a crime. I wanted to get the pro-abortion character to mention how that differs in his opinion and give his view on it.

• 2nd annotation: AllSides/ In Supreme Court Clash Between Elites and Pro-Lifers, The Peaceful Will Win

• “In Supreme Court Clash Between Elites and Pro-Lifers, The Peaceful Will Win.” CBN News, 18 Mar. 2020, www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2020/march/in-supreme-court-clash-between-elites-and-pro-lifers-the-peaceful-will-win.

• https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2020/march/in-supreme-court-clash-between-elites-and-pro-lifers-the-peaceful-will-win

• Evidence: “The activists spoke of abortion as a sacred right, untouchable by regulation and oversight, and an act of empowerment for a woman.” (Rose 1).

• I took from this article that it’s a way of empowering women into feeling like they actually have control over their life and body because many women feel like they don’t have that right or control over their life.

• I wanted to add this to my paper because it mentioned something that I really never thought about when it comes to allowing women to abort. So I thought it was interesting to add and I felt like many people, like me, didn't really see it in that light.

• 1st source: AllSides

• 1st annotation: New Zealand House Passes Bill Legalizing Abortion

• Evans, Zachary. “New Zealand House Passes Bill Legalizing Abortion.” National Review, 19 Mar. 2020, www.nationalreview.com/news/new-zealand-house-passes-bill-legalizing-abortion.

• https://www.nationalreview.com/news/new-zealand-house-passes-bill-legalizing-abortion/

• Evidence: “I will feel proud to have done my bit to stand up for the women of New Zealand,” Adams said." (Evans 1)

• This article was talking about how it's the women’s right to have an abortion. That's why they legalized it in New Zealand. Plus, anyone who helped in this process felt happy and proud of doing so since its obviously the right thing to do.

• I chose this statement to add to my paper because it talked about one of the main points or the base of people who are pro-abortion.

Did you notice this from the very start or did you notice this after focusing and trying to dissolve everything there?

It's true that a selfie can hide many meanings that are important. I never thought of it that way.

An amazing attention grabber as usual.

If this part isn’t mentioned that people will definitely interpret it differently because a mat really isn’t significant unless it’s your own and you did something with it.

Each place in each individuals lives really do teach different things because it puts you in a different environment that you have to adapt to.

Was there anything in the photo or Moraine Valley that was unfamiliar to you after you looked around?

That's why it's amazing to have somewhere that you could call a home and you know that you could always go back there for comfort.

Based on this information, one can come to a conclusion that strangers might notice things in places that are familiar to us that we probably didn't notice.

Maybe that's why you lack enthusiasm towards this house because you got so used to it that its the norm now for you.

Or maybe because you’re still living there? because when you look at photos from your other house you get happy and excited even though it doesn’t really have a "punctum" and it’s just the place you lived at before.

The same thing happened to you when you lived at your other house else for 18 years. It’s just a continuous cycle.

It really depends on how you feel going into a new situation. If you are excited about it then yes, you would love and appreciate everything about it but if you go into it not happy or wanting to then you look at everything in a bad way. So I love how you approached your new life with such enthusiasm unlike many people.

I feel like many people experience this with not only places but even belongings or people. Humans tend to not notice these kinds of attachments until they lose it. Everyone is like that.