What remains a challenge for systemic injustice in Wikipedia is the question of who gatekeeps and sets the rules for what counts as credible knowledge.
How can we as faculty educate our students about the process of receiving feedback and working in an open space - when your work can be critiqued or changed in dynamic open spaces v. traditional peer reviewed process? How are we talking about the inherent risks involved and the gatekeeping processes that are different in a space like wikipedia compared to a peer reviewed publication?