26 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2017
    1. “Heather, did Mr. Abnesti just now make you decide which of us, me or Rogan, to give some Darkenfloxx™ to?” I said. “Yes,” Heather said. She must have been on some VeriTalk™, because she spoke the truth in spite of Abnesti’s withering silencing glance. “Did you recently fuck Rogan, Heather?” I said. “In addition to me? And also fall in love with him, as you did with me?” “Yes,” she said.

      Jeff seems to be the only character in this story who was able to make the connection and notice what was being done to all of them. Did the other characters see the connection as well and the author decided not tot write about it, or is Jeff just being portrayed as the more intelligent character.

    2. Nearby was a brick. I grabbed it, glanced Mike in the head with it. Then was on top of him. Mike gave. That is, there on his back, scalp bleeding, he gave, by shooting me a certain look, like, Dude, come on, we’re not all that serious about this, are we?

      This shows that the crimes vary for why they are in this study. But I feel like there should be different experiments going on for the various levels of crimes. Like Rachel did way worse, and was still getting the same punishment/treatment that Jeff was.

    3. because after that came her biggie: a triple murder—her dealer, the dealer’s sister, the dealer’s sister’s boyfriend

      I am wondering why the author let us know why Rachel was "here" and doing the tests, but we could not learn about why Heather was there also. At first I thought maybe it was becuase Heather's crimes were worse, but I do not see how it could be worse than what Rachel had done now...

    1. Two roads diverged in a wood, and I— I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference.

      I do not agree that the author claimed he took the less traveled road. The two sentences that I only highlighted are basically saying each road/path was equally traveled on.

    2. Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, And sorry I could not travel both

      The first stanza is just talking about how there was a "fork" in the road, and choosing which one to travel on.

    3. yellow wood

      This made me think of the Wizard of Oz. I googled to see if the movie and this poem were written in the same time period, but they were not. Wizard of oz was 1939, so it came out after this poem was written. This was just a connection I made when I first read the poem.

  2. Sep 2017
  3. scsurebels.wordpress.com scsurebels.wordpress.com
    1. microcosm:

      a community, place, or situation regarded as encapsulating in miniature the characteristic qualities or features of something much larger

    2. Memory is an old Mexican woman sweeping her yard with a broom. She has grown even smaller now, residing at that vanishing point

      I am not sure if "Memory" is a real person, but I think it could be talking about what was happening, or seen in the camps. People were not treated properly, possible starved, therefore are vanishing.

    1. took a train to Chicago for factory work, for packaging bolts.

      Not sure if this was in the time period of the industrial revolution, but this is talking about doing work that machines could normally do. Is it combining a laborer society and a industrial society?

    2. Because there was little else to do, one of them chased a stray with his tail between his legs and shot him through the head

      This made me recall the part in the book on page 11 where the women killed the dog with a shovel. As with many of the other stories we read, it seems like animals are always getting killed or tormented

    1. “Alive? Yes, Annie; it may well be said to possess life, for it has absorbed my own being into itself; and in the secret of that butterfly, and in its beauty,–which is not merely outward, but deep as its whole system,–is represented the intellect, the imagination, the sensibility, the soul of an Artist of the Beautiful! Yes; I created it. But”–and here his countenance somewhat changed–“this butterfly is not now to me what it was when I beheld it afar off in the daydreams of my youth.”

      This part confused me. Was this a real life butterfly? Or like a mechanical - machine like creation? Or was this beautiful butterfly something that he had imagined and in his mind he thought others believed it was real too?

    2. “Poh, child! He has not the sort of ingenuity to invent anything better than a Dutch toy,” answered her father, who had formerly been put to much vexation by Owen Warland’s irregular genius. “A plague on such ingenuity! All the effect that ever I knew of it was to spoil the accuracy of some of the best watches in my shop. He would turn the sun out of its orbit and derange the whole course of time, if, as I said before, his ingenuity could grasp anything bigger than a child’s toy!”

      Just from this little paragraph I was able to assume that Peter does like Owen. There were many later lines that reinforced this idea

  4. Aug 2017
    1. “Remove it, remove it, whatever be the cost, or we shall both go mad!”  

      Georgiana's views on her own birthmark have drastically changed from the beginning.

    2. When wearied of this, Aylmer bade her cast her eyes upon a vessel containing a quantity of earth. She did so, with little interest at first; but was soon startled to perceive the germ of a plant shooting upward from the soil. Then came the slender stalk; the leaves gradually unfolded themselves; and amid them was a perfect and lovely flower.  

      Is this somewhat comparing the flower to her birthmark? How at first you may not find a flower beautiful, or see its purpose, since it is only a seed under the ground, but then it grows into a beautiful flower. Much like for the birthmark, you may not see it as beautiful or know its value until you have seen it 'grow'? Like growing aware and accepting of the birthmark?

    3. Aylmer sat in his wife’s presence with a guilty feeling.

      This is the first time it really shows Aylmer having any emotions or remorse for what he says, does, and thinks.

    4. Aylmer’s sombre imagination was not long in rendering the birthmark a frightful object, causing him more trouble and horror than ever Georgiana’s beauty, whether of soul or sense, had given him delight.

      This is showing that the bad parts of her are outweighing the good parts of her as seen in Alymers eyes.

    5. “but never on yours. No, dearest Georgiana, you came so nearly perfect from the hand of Nature that this slightest possible defect, which we hesitate whether to term a defect or a beauty, shocks me, as being the visible mark of earthly imperfection.”  

      He does not like her birthmark and seen it as an imperfection

    6. “No, indeed,” said she, smiling; but perceiving the seriousness of his manner, she blushed deeply. “To tell you the truth it has been so often called a charm that I was simple enough to imagine it might be so.”

      She liked her birth mark and didn't think it made her any less.

    1. Doesn’t she look pretty? everyone said. Consummation at last. To every woman a happy ending. 

      Really messed up poem in general, but the fact it talks about a dead girl in a casket looking beautiful, and then that being a happy ending is pretty morbid. Are we to assume she killed herself?