21 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2025
    1. One cannot change this all in a moment, but one can at least change one’s own habits, and from time to time one can even, if one jeers loudly enough, send some worn-out and useless phrase – some jackboot, Achilles’ heel, hotbed, melting pot, acid test, veritable inferno or other lump of verbal refuse – into the dustbin where it belongs.

      Well this has answered my question from earlier! The way we can really bring about change is to firstly be aware of what's going on, then put a conscious effort into stopping it whenever you can.

    2. What is above all needed is to let the meaning choose the word, and not the other way about. In prose, the worst thing one can do with words is to surrender to them. When you think of a concrete object, you think wordlessly, and then, if you want to describe the thing you have been visualising, you probably hunt about till you find the exact words that seem to fit it. When you think of something abstract you are more inclined to use words from the start, and unless you make a conscious effort to prevent it, the existing dialect will come rushing in and do the job for you, at the expense of blurring or even changing your meaning. Probably it is better to put off using words as long as possible and get one’s meanings as clear as one can through pictures and sensations.

      This essay has helped me realize it can be really simple to fall into "bad" writing and it isn't necessarily on the individual but essentially habits we have picked up from the society around us. I will keep in mind to spend more time considering phrases that I use in essays and if it's conveying the image and message I want to get across to the audience,

    3. A bad usage can spread by tradition and imitation, even among people who should and do know better.

      Exactly, as a society standards need to be heightened but how do we go about doing that?

    4. While freely conceding that the Soviet régime exhibits certain features which the humanitarian may be inclined to deplore, we must, I think, agree that a certain curtailment of the right to political opposition is an unavoidable concomitant of transitional periods, and that the rigours which the Russian people have been called upon to undergo have been amply justified in the sphere of concrete achievement.

      Words are really a powerful tool. It can get you to convey something without outright saying it.

    5. feeling which suddenly becomes stronger at moments when the light catches the speaker’s spectacles and turns them into blank discs which seem to have no eyes behind them.

      Definitely have gotten this feeling from politicians before.

    6. The attraction of this way of writing is that it is easy. It is easier – even quicker, once you have the habit – to say In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption that than to say I think.

      The terrible part about reading this is that it has become SO SO SO much easier since George Orwell wrote this. Hell, we can get an A.I chat bot to "write" out whole essays for us now! People are barely thinking now and it's a problem.

    7. Objective consideration of contemporary phenomena compels the conclusion that success or failure in competitive activities exhibits no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity, but that a considerable element of the unpredictable must invariably be taken into account.

      It is hard to believe that this has essentially the same meaning as the good English passage because this is just so incomprehensible to me. He surely does get his point across though.

    8. In the case of a word like democracy, not only is there no agreed definition, but the attempt to make one is resisted from all sides.

      I mean, he is not wrong.

    9. there is no real need for any of the hundreds of foreign phrases now current in English.

      I wonder how George Orwell would feel about the common phrases used today particularly within Gen-Z. We have so many phrases that are nonsensical without the proper context, and we extremely different forms of writing now than we did in his time.

    10. Instead of being a single word, such as break, stop, spoil, mend, kill, a verb becomes a phrase, made up of a noun or adjective tacked on to some general-purposes verb such as prove, serve, form, play, render.

      I have never considered this point of view before. Like many other annotations stated, it feels kind of expected to tack on other words to a verb while writing to sound more "professional" or original. But in reality there is no need.

    11. This mixture of vagueness and sheer incompetence is the most marked characteristic of modern English prose, and especially of any kind of political writing.

      I was originally confused as to what argument was being made by the author through his writing, but now I feel he is making a point of how proper writing shouldn't just be expected from professional writers like he had stated before. But, for all aspects of English communication, especially in something important like politics. It shouldn't be a standard to have lazy or incomprehensible writing.

    1. Now they often walk with theirheads down, typing. Even when they are with friends, partners, children' everyone is ontheir own devices

      A very sad reality that is becoming all too common. I hope our generation can bring a change to this.

    2. We think constant connection will make us feel less lonely' The opposite is true' If we areunable to be alone, we are far more fk"iy to be lonely' If we don't teach our children tobe alone, they will know only how to be lonely'1')LL: .. tt==*,t -; t: :;

      This entire segment is very powerful and meaningful to me.

    3. A high school sophomorg tglld"t to methat he wishes te "orrlitalk to a; artificial intelligence program instead of his dad aboutdating;

      I have used A.I specifically Chatgpt to give me advice on friendships before, so this is quite relatable. It is a little bit scary how comforting an A.I robot can be to "conversate" with.

    4. But they don't. E-mail, Twitter, Facebook, all of these have theirplaces - in politics, commerce, romance und friendship.

      Reading this in 2025, all these social platforms DEFINITELY contribute to all the things she listed. It has become far more prevalent to see politics online, and witness romantic and friendly connections done solely through technology.

    5. Texting and e-mail and posting let us present the self we want to be' This means we canedit. And if we wish to, we can delete. Or retouch: the voice, the flesh' the face' the body'Not too much, not too liule -- just right

      The author is really making a point of we can be whoever we want to be on the internet, and it essentially takes away from our humanity a little bit.

    6. I'velearned that the little devices most of us carry around are so powerful that they changenot only what we do, but also who we are'

      This is very, very true. A lot of people's personalities nowadays come from what they consume on social media and what influencers they follow.

    7. My students teli me about an iirportant new skill: it involves maintaining eyecontact with someone while you text ro*.o.r" else;

      I personally hate that this is becoming normalized! I do not believe someone is paying attention to the conversation were having if they are going on their phone at the same time. It should not be considered a "skill" to do this.