An external discussion of this preprint is available on PubPeer: https://pubpeer.com/publications/8DA4B0AA40D8625B196C1014E32ED3

The discussion focuses on the study’s cross-validation design, including whether random rather than contiguous splits could allow temporal dependencies to influence the reported encoding results. It also considers how the language features were defined, how the findings compare with concept-cell coding, and how strongly the results support interpretations involving pattern separation and completion. Readers may wish to consult the original discussion for the full context.

paperstack.pub · The trust layer for preprints