11 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2017
    1. uma spent the first six years of his life on his family’s ruralshamba—or farm—inShinyanga District, one of two administrative districts that make up Sukumaland.In 1996 (when Juma was four), the shamba included approximately two hectares ofland that Juma’s father inherited from his father in accordance with the customarypatrilineal land-tenure practices of the Sukuma. Like most smallholder farmers inthe region, Juma’s father cultivated cotton and devoted a smaller patch of land tosubsistence foods, including maize and sweet potatoes

      This passage demonstrate culture-specific aspect of Juma’s life, he follow his family culture and focus on labor since a kid instead of studies to break the pattern. He as a child had to provide for his family because this is the focus in his culture, to help sustain your family. His culture is a circle we’re everyone just fallow the same pattern for their family sake. Juma had to work and that was the only option he had growing up thanks to his culture.

  2. Oct 2017
    1. Eventually, the drinking and smoking pot lead to hard drugs because there's never enough to keep the pain away. Finally the drug controls you, and you don't feel that pain anymore.

      The pain being described is mythological is a pain she has created base on feelings, feelings that just get deeper as she does into an addictive world of drugs and alcohol. Trying to get a fix or cure to her pain created in her head gets her in to a greater pain of depending on the drug to take a break from the pain.

    1. One woman mentioned that she would just sit at atable and cry for God’s help. Several women (6) chose todistract themselves from their symptoms and worries

      Another great example of how the biomedical explanatory frameworks of these women's distress clashed with the woman own frameworks of their distress. She's crying and praying for help and using distractions this is her culture way of dealing with the pain instead of counting on science/medicine.

    2. feelings of helplessness: ‘‘What is the use of taking anytreatment? Whatever has to happen will happen. There’sno solution for it. If he [husband] is good, theneverything would be fine’’.

      Great example of the biomedical framework clashing with the woman framework of their distress. She saying how she see no point on medicine/treatment basically she doesn't believe this works or helps. That's just something within the culture she was brought up in the idea of it'll heal on its own.

    1. o. That he, that they come to him with accusations, that the dead woman iscoming, as if he is guilty...for not saving he

      Yosef is expressing his experience, the reason behind his PTSD. Yosef feelings after the accident and torment his is experiencing show us embodiment.

    2. Especially problematic is the fact Yosef is not studying Torah. Inaccordance with Haredi values, Rabbi Dov said that the fact that Yosefwas not steeped in learning created a dangerous situation

      I disagree with what the author is stating, he's saying that Yosef issues are because of his lack of religious beliefs. Religion in my opinion doesn't play with your head and his issue started once he experience the accident with the women. Ever since he lived this experience he hasn't been the same, this is why he's getting help. Studying and dedication more time towards his religion is not going to get him the answers to his problem.

    1. The whole thing was you had to get the facts. And thefeelings were something that was outside the medicalarena. And I think it helped me start to change the focus ofmy consultations onto the feelings that were going on. Andof course that’s the way in which you do—that contact withthe body self that’s being presented. People come intoyour practice and they present what they know isacceptable to present. They present biomedical facts. Butyou learn to switch out of that onto the feelings...and youstart to actually contact the self

      By knowing the history of the patient in patient’s own words to better understand and later to relate with the medical facts. It also helps in conceptualizing the individual without recourse to compartmentalizing components which entails patient’s mind, soul, spirit and body. Embodiment further helps in interacting physically as well as the doctors engages themselves with their patient’s body.

  3. Sep 2017
    1. The illness narrative as a moral testing of our basic moral premises isconcerned with finding a framework within which the illness can be dis-cussed. That is to say, we test various hypotheses for the onset of the ill-ness: for example, illness as a genetically determined and thereforeunavoidable event, or illness as an event caused by our own negligence orattitudes to life (smoking, for example) and which has been proved tohave had negative consequences.

      This is another meaning i found for sickness is sometimes the believe that is genetics meaning we just inherit the sickness is in our blood line or looking for a factor(s) of why is that we came to get ill. Sometimes as human we think our bad behaviors cause the sickness or we inherit these because someone in our tree line had it. Italic

    2. 52 Lars-Christer Hydenclinical work can, through illness narratives, become better able to attendto what their patients say. But just as narratives gradually came to occupyan increasingly centralised position in social science generally, so also hastheir importance in illness research grown. A central aspect of the narrativeconcept is that, besides being an important knowledge form, it is able torepresent and reflect illness experiences in daily life. Today the narrativeconcept enjoys the pivotal position once assigned to concepts like identity -it could even be argued that the identity concept has become subordinateto the narrative concept (see for example Mathieson and Stam 1995).The growing theoretical importance of the narrative concept in the fieldof illness research is most probably a reflection of the change and expan-sion of the illness concept towards a greater emphasis on siiffering as apoint of departure in social scientific studies of illness. This makes it pos-sible to study the patient's illness experience and illness world as a socialreality apart from the conception and definition of illness as formulatedby biomedicine.Methodologically, earlier views on illness narratives were based on theidea that identity could be conceived in terms of one individual life his-tory. We have become increasingly aware, however, that situational fac-tors play a decisive role in the construction of narratives and that wecontinually produce new narratives in new contexts. Thus, it seems all themore evident that it is not a question of the narrative, but rather of dif-ferent possible narratives which are determined by situational factors,particularly by the interaction between narrator and listener. Several writ-ers have shown how factors of this kind may affect the way in which theillness is presented (Clark and Mishler 1992).Narrative and illnessAny illness constitutes a disruption, a discontinuance of an ongoing life(Bury 1982). The current of daily life is obstructed, perhaps blocked alto-gether. Illness may revise our conceptions of what is changeable, and wemay be forced to change the premises upon which we plan and evaluateour lives (Charmaz 1992).Acute illness, in the best of cases, has only a temporary significance inour lives: it constitutes a transitory and limited disruption; an acute ill-ness may cause us to re-examine our lives in the light of our own frailty.Chronic illness, on the other hand, usually changes the very foundationof our lives because the illness creates new and qualitatively different lifeconditions. Our range of options no longer seems so wide and varied, wemay be forced to look at the future from a totally different angle. Thus,even the past acquires new meaning: as a part of lived life.All types of illnesses thus affect one of the fundamental aspects of life- its extension in time, its temporality. T

      Sickness interrupts and affects life no matter the severity of the illness. Sickness means that your future decisions are now going to be base on the sickness, no matter if is a insignificant decision is going to be make on the fact that you're currently sick. For severe illness sometimes it means your whole life is about to change, it's an eye opening and you turn back to the times you weren't sick in appreciation because now everything rotates around your sickness.

    3. Any illness constitutes a disruption, a discontinuance of an ongoing life(Bury 1982). The current of daily life is obstructed, perhaps blocked alto-gether. Illness may revise our conceptions of what is changeable, and wemay be forced to change the premises upon which we plan and evaluateour lives (Charmaz 1992).Acute illness, in the best of cases, has only a temporary significance inour lives: it constitutes a transitory and limited disruption; an acute ill-ness may cause us to re-examine our lives in the light of our own frailty.Chronic illness, on the other hand, usually changes the very foundationof our lives because the illness creates new and qualitatively different lifeconditions. Our range of options no longer seems so wide and varied, wemay be forced to look at the future from a totally different angle. Thus,even the past acquires new meaning: as a part of lived life.All types of illnesses thus affect one of the fundamental aspects of life- its extension in time, its temporality. T

      Sickness interrupts and affects life no matter the severity of the illness. Sickness means that your future decisions are now going to be base on the sickness, no matter if is a insignificant decision is going to be make on the fact that you're currently sick. For severe illness sometimes it means your whole life is about to change, it's an eye opening and you turn back to the times you weren't sick in appreciation because now everything rotates around your sickness.

    4. ury (1982) points out in an early article that espe-cially chronic illness can be looked upon as a disruption of a person'songoing life, thereby also entailing a disruption of the person's identity.Chronic illness alters the relationship between the patient's body, self andsurrounding world. Thus, for the chronically ill, the reconstruction ofone's own life story is of central importance (Williams 1984). Narrativis-ing the chronic illness within the framework of one's own life historymakes it possible to give meaning to events that have disrupted andchanged the course of one's life (see also Williams 1993, Bury 1991).

      "sickness isn't just a clinical diagnosis” is something that affects your life, interrupting whatever task you have at play and even at times changing your attitude towards those around you or your daily task. This might affect your sickness because your environment plays a big role on how you perceive and feel towards the illness making it better or worst. For example having your sickness affect your work/job might have an even bigger negative impact on your health/sickness making you feel even more sick, so sickness is just not something you deal with at the doctor office is a daily life issue that your environment can help better or worsen.