This is his rebuttal against my argument that we arent original we have experienced this world and AI observes our observations. I don't disagree with him that feelings in our writing is the thing that matters the most. 'saying that there is a time and a place for AI and not to completely demonize it. For example art not every business has the money to spend hundreds of dollars to splurge on a logo that has every small detail they want so if they use AI for a logo is that completely bad?

I think that's an example of being too reliant on AI forgetting the actual point of the things that were doing day to day. Then again there are always people in this world that will go to those extreme path

Im split into two ways;. One side is saying if your a young person that is lazy and always want stuff the easy way you'll become intellectually crippled and become so reliant on AI that you won't be able to form thoughts without AI. The other side is saying that it can be a good starting point if your trying to learn about new subjects. It can tell you the beginning guide and then direct you into the sources you can delve into to further expand your knowledge

I think it's a bit of an exaggeration demonizing AI but I think we already know it's not alive and it says its happy to see us. It's like dora the explora saying how's your day going its just a cartoon and behind it is a voice actor that will never know you and your struggles in life.

I've heard that they got there data to train the AI illegally, but I don't think that's our problem I think that's between them and the person they stole from. As long as you inspect sources they use and credit them then that's not your issue. I think sometimes we dig deep into stuff thats none of our buisness. There are a lot of sketchy things going in the world and if we focus too much on its orgin we would die from boycotting everything. It's like if your boss does something illegally to get his money but your just working a normal job as long you don't use that money in a bad way then its none of your buisness what he does because your not directly assisting his act.

I guess there are details that you can find is profound that you won't find AI doing since it's mostly taking whats common but whose to say that It wont in the future make the small decisions we do. At the end of the day when we draw its from our in expereince in life and Ai just observing our observations

I'd have to disagree on this one I've seen what images Ai can generate. Based on the prompt you give it I've seen some good looking art bettter then most artist... does that go back to what he thinks about AI being bland? If AI takes whats bland only then why is its images so artistic? wouldnt they be bland and repetitive as well.

I've never really thought about that. Since Ai is mostly data it will take what's been repeated it's not gonna reveal to you the hidden gems that went through its system

this is the Main point,