30 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. ChurchTrac offers three pricing tiers:​Free Plan: Includes features like people and family management, user accounts, security, and tech support.​Standard Plan: Starting at $9/month, with pricing based on the number of names in your church database and including essential and commonly-used features like attendance tracking and online giving.​Plus Plan: Starting at $24/mo, with pricing

      Need to be updated as churchtrac don't have a free plan

    2. Trying them both for a while is probably your best bet, especially since both platforms provide free trials and free permanent plans.

      Need to be changed because churchtrac don't have free plan

    3. With ChurchTrac you also get team scheduling features, a song library, lyrics and chords management, as well as an integration with SongSelect.

      should be removed

    4. More Advanced Worship Planning, including a song library, lyrics and chords, and SongSelect integration; as well as team scheduling. Room Tracking: Within their Worship Planning set of features, ChurchTrac lets you assign a location to a scheduled event or service. This is useful when you want to track which rooms are occupied and which are available at a particular time.

      Should be removed

    5. $105/month Or $94.50/month paid annually ($1,134/year)

      churchtrac price for the unlimited is $112 per month with messaging and accounting or $101 if paid annually

    6. Pricing Models

      We need to add a conclusion paragraph saying that, although ChMeetings and Churchtrac provide the same pricing model but ChMeetings is more value for money which can save you $85 per year (~25% saving per year)

    7. offers two main plans, Standard and Plus, which provide access to different sets of features, the Plus plan being the more advanced. The prices for these plans increase based on the number of people you want to manage.

      The pricing of churchtrac depends on the number of people with minimal number 75 person without the accounting and the message and to get the full features of the software you will need to pay $31 (extra ~%25 more than ChMeetings) to get the same value and the yearly payment saves only 10% compared to the 16% saving of ChMeetings

    8. offers several pricing plans that come with specific features and are based on the number of people you want to manage. This structure is predefined and you can’t change the features offered by each plan. However, it’s much simpler for churches to understand what they get, and costs may be lower with this model.

      we need to highlight in this that you can get the full features of the software starting from the small plan for $25 which include everything including the accounting module with a people limit of 250 person and the yearly payment saves ~16%

    9. Churches must subscribe to a paid plan to access church management features, including people management, reporting, and online giving, which may make it less accessible for churches looking to start with minimal or no budge

      we should highlight that since churchtrac don't have a free plan then this puts a financial burden on the church to evaluate the software

    10. ChurchTrac is known for its ease of use, with a straightforward interface that simplifies workflows for church administrators. The dashboard and navigation structure make it accessible to users with little technical experience. The learning curve is rather minimal for this platform as well, though, like with ChMeetings, some features may require specialized knowledge. This includes their Accounting module or the Background Check option.

      This is written in a too much marketing for churchtrac and should be changed to not be marketing very well to churchtrac"

    11. For anyone requiring assistance when getting started

      We should change this to say something like "Although ChMeetings is well know for it's easy to use features, chmeetings also provides detailed ...etc"

    12. Your church is small to mid-sized and values simplicity.

      This should be updated because since people are comparing ChMeetings to Churhtrac then they are small to mid and this should be changed and added to chmeetings instead