Delete. No new subject.

How can the recipes for other types of foods be modified to create fewer crumbs?

double the baking soda

delete

you tested

This does create an awkward subject verb agreement issue. You could most easily get around it by shifting to "generated" (which works for both single and plural recipe/recipes). That still fits the context.

Or, you could just leave it as "recipes" ... you are asking which ones (of seven) generated the most crumbs.... that's also accurate for the project.

Or, just leave it, and assume most won't care that recipe/generate is an issue and treat "recipe(s)" as inherently plural.

because

No new subject

For reading clarity, it might make sense to reference it the way you did "Before" and "After"...

"Percent remaining"

(That matches the way it appears on the chart" -- or just use "percent remaining" lowercase)

"which equals 0.92 or 92%"

Noticing it here.... in multiple surrounding spots in this section, you've spelled out three... "three different crumb tests"... "three cookies"

Might look back to see how much of this you've done. I see two instances of "3 trials" right here... 3.g and 4.e... but if you've spelled numbers out elsewhere... be consistent.

Seems like you're second clause justifies just leaving this as "or"

about?

Delete

... unless they are burning as the previous sentence indicates.... obvious. But the sentence is contradictory.

And this suggests that if they are not burning at 5 minutes... you leave them to 9 or 11..... again... there's a bit of a logic gap here. This seems to "suggest" they might be burning at 5 minutes.... (which may be true for one recipe).

No comma; no new subject

The whisk isn't being thrown into the bowl with the ingredients.

"In a small bowl, combine the flour, baking soda, and salt and then whisk, as shown in Figure 1."

(Need the "and then" -- otherwise, break it to two sentences: In a small bowl, combine the flour, baking soda, and salt. Whisk the ingredients together, as shown in Figure 1. )

weigh?

Run-on: (comma required)

in one day, or you

Nestlé

using?

using?

Again... issue of presentation.

e.g.,

If the end result is that "one" is most important, I would suggest correcting the grammar -- which --> is

If the implication is that more than one (of the three) is "most" important... just leave it.

We don't typically "tell" them what their variables are. Particularly at this level, they should be able to determine that. I would suggest revising how this is phrased.

Rethink "Lastly" twice in the same paragraph.

using "i.e.," here is cumbersome... at the high school level... this may not be needed

or just rephrase it: by agitating (by shaking or stirring)

suggested change:

"that a cookie produces"

While this comma can technically be used here, in this case, the sentence will read better without it. (This sentence appears in the abstract, too. Same change suggested.) -- And, yes, grammarly will suggest ", such as" - which isn't the voice here.

cute... but may or may not work

"crumbly" might work

a "crumb risk" could work

or "the risk of crumbs"

First -- the comma before "and then" needs to be removed. There is no new verb. Second -- there is a parallelism issue with the ending. Two suggested alternatives:

Because crumbs can float in zero gravity, they can easily move around once they are loose and then squeeze into places they should not be, such as electrical panels, where they may cause fires, and air filtration systems, where they may clog the system and cause damage.

Or... "where they may clog and break the system" (if you want to stay with "break")

Suggested edit to improve flow and parallelism: "Crumbs can float around in zero gravity, squeeze into electrical panels, where they may cause fires, and get sucked into and clog air filtration systems."

"Crumbs from food" -- more natural/typical phrasing (still true)

Delete

delete

role (and before you argue it... you have "roles is"... -- while you are listing two things here, this will read better as role (otherwise, you need "roles are" -- this is a grammar error as is))

Remove comma

Remove comment before publishing

Remove before publish

Should be 2024

Add sometehing like: Q: Does my car have to be able to stand stable when not in use. A: No. .... whatever

(I think this will be a question because only 1 wheel is required. A stable car isn't the goal here -- but some might assume that is a given.)

Noting - these will be linked

[delete]

pulled/twisted/tightened, etc.,

Will you include this list in the fragment (not just the table)

Maybe bold this to differentiate from tools. (I initially thought this was confusing because of the second list. I see though that you are differentiation materials (that can be use "on" the car) from tools

Maybe bold this to differentiate tools from materials

These are not related to testing

Does it have to be corrugated? Or could they use any kind of cardboard

You haven't actually said, in the introduction, what the goal is. Usually that isn't simply in the objective or abstract.... the final paragraph of the introduction would say something like, "Your cahllenge is to...."

Given that this will be for all grades, I think it might be worth defining what an axle is.

This is a page note (as far as I can tell a place to make an overall comment that is not attached to specific text)

this is Ben making a comment in Firefox using Hugo's account

Should the video be inline?

This is the title!

Testing

Should we remove "New"?