She claims that she had more 'experience' sniffing out the creeps. But does this really matter if, at the end of the day, she didn't experience cuomo's actions first-hand? She fights this line of questioning by listing 'big names' that she doesn't know personally as evidence for the 'breadth of her experience'. Is it also fair to validate someone's trauma because they were more likely to be less 'experienced' with sexual harrassment? the logic here is flawed, but the conflation of old-age wisdom with ___ creates a mental shortcut around that jumble of logic.
Another note, this article leaves out critical parts of her logic (seen in her full statement https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/12/opinion/letters/cuomo-harassment-claims.html) that are much more subject to outrage than what they selected to include here... (COME BACK AFTER READING TO EXPLORE WHY THE AUTHOR MIGHT HAVE DONE THIS)