I'd never heard of the term redlining before, but it just makes so much sense as a concept. Doing this is actually very popular back home in Bulgaria, in the context of the Roma population asking for loans/credits. People are biased to believe that Roma people are scammers and too poor to be able to maintain any creditworthiness, so they deny them loans purely based on their ethnicity. I'd never really thought about it, but I think it's such a discriminatory way of determining who's "worthy" and who's not.

This is really interesting. Last year I actually took a sociology class on gender and sexuality and we talked a lot about hegemonic masculinity, so it struck me to be seeing the word again in this text as a distinct domain of the matrix of domination. I'd never really thought about power and oppression in terms of those four domains, so it's definitely something new to consider. I also saw further down that the hegemonic domain consists of culture and the media, which says a lot about how those two have the power to determine how we see people of different identities.

I think this part here is really interesting, because "humanities computing" definitely sounds like there is an emphasis on technology and the need to force the humanities to "compute." While, in my opinion, when we're talking about the digital humanities there is a sense of the mere inevitability of digitalizing the humanities, however the digital aspect is something that is added to them, like a filter, transforming them into a separate, independent field. That is, the humanities don't have to do anything -- they don't have to change -- instead, a digital filter is applied to them in order to create a field that can exist by itself, if that makes sense. In any case, I think it's important to keep in mind that the humanities can be done digitally without having technology overpower the human aspect of academia.