5 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2020
    1. Immediate affirmative clear and unmistakable answer from your government is the only way to avoid endless misery. Until I have received this answer alas, I am unable to discuss the subject of your telegram. As a matter of fact I must request you to immediatly [sic] order your troops on no account to commit the slightest act of trespassing over our frontiers.

      I believe that Willy and Nicky both have chances of holding the blame but Willy, on the other hand, has a much higher blame for. The telegram starts off with Nicky reaching out to Willy which shows that Nicky is much more concerned than Willy. The second thing is that Willy kind of puts the blame on Nicky by saying that the peace of Europe lies within Nicky's hands. He also says that the blame will not be laid at his front door. This is means that Willy is not going to be the blame for, Nicky is. Towards the end, Willy concludes by saying that Nicky's government is the only way to avoid endless misery and that he won't discuss the subject of the telegram. Willy tried to discuss on solving this issue but most of it he was saying how he hopes it resolves instead of really trying. If Willy had the same level of concern or tried anything but ending the telegram like that, it would've probably done something.

    1. On fluttered folk and wild— Your new-caught, sullen peoples, Half devil and half child Take up the White Man’s burden

      Kipling was right. In his poem he talks about how the Philippines is America’s responsibility and because of that, it’s become a burden. America has this need that helping other nations is just simply their destiny. This was what America was trying to do here also. "Half devil and half child" This shows America's perspective of the Philippines which was why they felt like they needed to do something about it. In Section 3 of The American Empire, it also states something important. It says, "American forces were instructed to secure Manila". When you imagine America as a whole country compared to these small nations, it's like a father caressing a baby. This is what I vision in my head when I read this. Of course, not everyone had mutual feelings when it came to this. Therefore, I would say that Kipling's argument is true.

  2. Jan 2020
    1. . By 1886, the Knights had over seven hundred thousand members. The Knights envisioned a cooperative producer-centered society that rewarded labor, not capital, but, despite their sweeping vision, the Knights focused on practical gains that could be won through the organization of workers into local unions.13

      This was the Union's view, they wanted to gain or become powerful through the organizations of workers into the local unions. On the other hand, the Capitals' view was that the weak stay weak and the strong become stronger. The Capitals' view is a more selfish view because this was a time where thousands of immigrants were coming into the country considering the fact that majority of them were poor. The country will not have a successful future if only a few are succeeding whilst thousands are living in poverty. They have to acknowledge everybody in order to succeed as a country.

  3. Nov 2019
    1. Although women could not vote or hold office, they played an important role in politics as people who controlled influence.18 They helped hold official Washington together. And according to one local society woman, “the ladies” had “as much rivalship and party spirit, desire of precedence and authority” as male politicians had.19 These women upheld a strict code of femininity and sexual morality. They paid careful attention to the rules that governed personal interactions and official relationships.

      In The Reshaping of Everyday Life, Pg. 44, Second Paragraph, it says "Occasionally, American printing offices saw women--usually printers' wives and daughters--setting type or reading proof." This shows that even though women didn't have many rights or much freedom, they still played important roles way back. In the book, some women were proof-readers but in this document some played roles in politics.

  4. Oct 2019
    1. What then is the American, this new man? He is either an European, or the descendant of an European, hence that strange mixture of blood, which you will find in no other country. I could point out to you a family whose grandfather was an Englishman, whose wife was Dutch, whose son married a French woman, and whose present four sons have now four wives of different nations. He is an American, who leaving behind him all his ancient prejudices and manners, receives new ones from the new mode of life he has embraced, the new government he obeys, and the new rank he holds. He becomes an American by being received in the broad lap of our great Alma Mater. Here individuals of all nations are melted into a new race of men, whose labours and posterity will one day cause great changes in the world. Americans are the western pilgrims, who are carrying along with them that great mass of arts, sciences, vigour, and industry which began long since in the east; they will finish the great circle. The Americans were once scattered all over Europe; here they are incorporated into one of the finest systems of population which has ever appeared, and which will hereafter become distinct by the power of the different climates they inhabit. The American ought therefore to love this country much better than that wherein either he or his forefathers were born. Here the rewards of his industry follow with equal steps the progress of his labour; his labour is founded on the basis of nature, self-interest; can it want a stronger allurement? Wives and children, who before in vain demanded of him a morsel of bread, now, fat and frolicsome, gladly help their father to clear those fields whence exuberant crops are to arise to feed and to clothe them all; without any part being claimed, either by a despotic prince, a rich abbot, or a mighty lord. Here religion demands but little of him; a small voluntary salary to the minister, and gratitude to God; can he refuse these? The American is a new man, who acts upon new principles; he must therefore entertain new ideas, and form new opinions. From involuntary idleness, servile dependence, penury, and useless labour, he has passed to toils of a very different nature, rewarded by ample subsistence. –This is an American

      I strongly agree with one of the things he said. It says,"...hence that strange mixture of blood,which you will find in no other country" I agree because I see this everywhere. America pretty much filled with cultures and people from different parts of the world. Where I'm from, in South Carolina BBQ plays a major role when it comes to food. But here in Iowa they eat Scotcheroos, put chilli on cinnamon, andall kinds of stuff. One thing I would have to disagree upon is that I don't think American is a new man. Yes I understand that it has existed back to the ancient times but I see American as an old man filled with more and different knowledge (different nations). That is just how I see it. American an old man that more knowledgeable now than he was before.