Common xenophobic scapegoats in American history include the fear of Chinese, Russians, Japanese, Jews, and Muslims.
The US government has played a role in creating such conjecture many times over.
Common xenophobic scapegoats in American history include the fear of Chinese, Russians, Japanese, Jews, and Muslims.
The US government has played a role in creating such conjecture many times over.
they withheld the results of other investigations that were skeptical of the condition.
This is concerning.
Another curious action was the decision to remove the panel’s only MPI specialist, Simon Wessely, after he publicly expressed the view that psychogenic factors may have played a role
Is the blatant dismissal of MPI solely from a misunderstanding of the condition, or are there subconscious biases to accuse foreign adversaries?
MPI is a collective stress reaction that is based on a belief and is commonly found in normal populations.
Preconceptions led to the strong refusal to consider MPI
was forced to resign after refusing to rule out MPI as a possible cause
Shows how highly political and emotional this case is
played an influential role in how their symptoms were perceived
confirmation bias? Symptoms of paranoia or anxiety?
Such changes are common in conditions ranging from migraine to depression to normal aging
Again, shouldn't those conducting these studies be familiar with these realities of such tests?
Several
Mentions the four major studies and the wrongdoings that contributed to misinterpreted data
Furthermore, 12 of those affected had histories of concussion compared to none in the healthy controls, which could account for the differences between the groups.
Shows a preexisting brain trauma
“appeared to have sustained injury to widespread brain networks without an associated history of head trauma”
Wouldn't it be standard to first conduct a standard MRI?
the mixing of politics with science
My second article was guilty of this, and when it happens, it decreases the credibility of the case
A typical sound recording device would not be able to recordthe microwave sound because it is generated inside the sub-ject’s head. This includes any commercially available cellularmobile telephone. On the contrary, if it was easy to record thesound with a typical sound recording device, most personsin the same room or environment should be able to hear theloud sound.
Illustrates the feasibility of the phenomenon
Significantly, they also fall within the permissible‘‘safe’’ limits of currently promulgated safety standards andprotection guidelines, The required microwave technologyis mature and in general, commercially available in manydeveloped countries
What would this technology be used for?
computer simulation of microwave auditoryeffect in an anatomical human head
Supporting evidence
and even caus-ing potential brain tissue injury.
Extreme case, but effects vary
umerous laboratoryinvestigations and theoretical research, and supported by bio-logical, physical, mathematical, and computer simulationsalong with reported experiences of the embassy staff.
Supporting evidence: compare with the group, how strong is the evidence of their theories?
Depending on modulation and pulse width, differentmicrowave pulses or pulse sequences will generate differentsound sensations via microwave auditory effect
Explanation for variety of sounds reported
knocking sounds
Very different from the nails on a chalkboard scenario
nails-colliding-on-the-chalkboard effect are significant.
high-pitched, screeching
especially in individuals with distinct early symptoms,appears to be directed, pulsed microwave energ
Outside study that supports argument
the microwave auditory effect pro-vides a scientific explanation for the Havana syndrome.
Note that this is still not confirmed and there is no universal consensus
The symptomsinclude headaches, severe hearing loss, ringing in the ears,nausea, and problems with balance or vertigo, and are sug-gestive of a connection to the inner ear apparatus within thehuman head
Symptoms
These attacks began in Moscow some seventy-one years ago, in 1953, and were eventually privately admitted to by Soviet officials
I don't consider past actions as sufficient evidence
an apparent attack on Ukrainian peace negotiators on or around March 3 of that year
Important consideration if there is any validity to this claim
As of the end of 2022, perhaps up to 1,500 US officials had complained of having suffered such debilitating and disabling symptoms as constant headaches, dizziness, loss of memory and vision, nausea, insomnia, and vertigo.
To increase credibility, how do these compare to non-US officials? Were others experiencing this effect? Also, does it compare closely with an existing ailment?
members of their families
Still no mention of canadians
severe headaches and nausea, after hearing unidentifiable grinding, piercing, and unbearable noises inside their heads, with those who were exposed the longest suffering from the most crippling disabilities.
similar yet some variation in reported symptoms compared to Lin's study
American
Does not mention Canadian officials nor family members
he Journal of US Intelligence Studies
Published in a journal provides credibility; perhaps the above bullet points were merely commentary by the organization
tolerating, denying, and concealing decades of Russian attacks, at the expense of American officials, has harmed the credibility and weakened the power of the US government to deter other acts of aggression.
Very serious and definitive allegation
threatening the Russians with retaliation.
Highly accusatory. While Lin provided an evidence-based scientific study, this article is useful in how it reflects US sentiments and accusations towards Russia
President Vladimir Putin and Russian military officers have publicly bragged about developing weapons that could cause health effects similar to Havana Syndrome.
No source provided here
recall a series of historically documented Soviet technical operations against the US embassy in Moscow that began in 1953 and lasted for decades, providing credible evidence of serious harm to numerous diplomats and other US officials.
Unlike James Lin's report, the FPRI is quasi-accusing Russians in Havana Syndrome