4 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2022
    1. Facebook employees were suppressing conservative news.Most PopularscienceScientists Have Discovered a New Set of Blood GroupsChris BaraniukcultureThe Psychological Impact of Consuming True CrimeAmelia TaitscienceA Bold Effort to Cure HIV—Using CrisprEmily Mullingear19 Android Settings You May Not Know AboutDavid Nield

      At work I often share what I am learning in class and what my assignments are. So brief descriptions of misinformation and how it's important to become aware of what you are seeing, and fact check anything and everything. My very conservative coworker shared her opinion that fact checking is not always an option because platforms like Facebook and Instagram are leftist platforms, and they would claim anything conservative is misinformation. It just goes to show that a platform that is heavily influenced by the people that are content creators or consumers is still claimed to be suppressive to a singular political party.

    2. The velocity of social sharing, the power of recommendation algorithms, the scale of social networks, and the accessibility of media manipulation technology has created an environment where pseudo events, half-truths, and outright fabrications thrive

      This is a statement, and a powerful one at that. I have struggled with coming up with a statement that explained the hold that misinformation and manipulation has on social networks. If we push to stop the spread, there is an outcry of how people's freedom of speech is being infringed upon. If we do nothing, the cry changes to that tech holds a responsibility to do something.

  2. Sep 2022
    1. However, the popularity of online video does not mean text- and audio-based formats don’t still have a big role to play in young people’s news habits. Under 35s still largely say they prefer to mostly read (58%) rather than mostly watch (15%) news – particularly, as our qualitative research finds, when looking for live updates and summaries or when keeping up with what is happening on a ‘need to know’ basis. Some say they seek out a mix of text and video content to better understand information. Others, particularly in Asia-Pacific and Latin American markets, are drawn to audio-based formats like podcasts that allow users to multitask while they listen. There is not a one-size-fits-all approach or medium through which newsrooms can attract younger audiences.

      I find it hysterical that there is not a one-size-fits-all approach or medium for newsrooms to attract younger audiences. I feel like growing up with more options on how to consume media, we became used to being able to pick and chose our medium for media consumption. I wonder what percentage of people over 35 prefer to watch the news and how it compares to the 15% of people under 35 who prefer to watch the news.

    2. And while 25–34s have largely embraced many of the same networks as social natives in their daily lives and news habits, they have remained much more loyal to Facebook (9pp higher for news than social natives) – the network this cohort largely grew up with – and have been slower to move to new networks like TikTok (5pp lower for news than social natives).

      I wonder why there seems to be a Facebook vs Instagram and Tiktok divide between different generations. When you get down to it, especially since Instagram is now owned by Facebook, they are both platforms that have evolved into very similar platforms with the same goal of sharing information/photos. I do think that Facebook has a more information/story feel to it with it's higher character count and there is a higher sense of community with different Facebook groups. I wonder if Facebook bought Instagram purely for because they wanted to appeal and make money off of the younger generation that is not on Facebook.