This is implying that campuses or at least areas designed for students to study are needed to often allow them to balance out their minds and relax while working to keep them in a set pace where they don't feel obligated or frustrated inside a building or type of closed-in room.

Feeling constantly stressed out can cause a student or a person to latch out in assertive behavior.

Human to nature interaction usually can reflect from one another as the human becomes almost "one with nature" being able to communicate and circulate through it whereas if the human was in a structured environment, they almost feel as though they are a bird caged.

This implies that a natural environment instead of a structured one urges to ease the mind to be open and circulate, not feel closed up or to cause any pain to it.

Because most campuses were designed for students being capable to travel by foot or through pavement, the parking lots or decks or garages for those who either commute to campus or the faculty and staff of the campus are usually placed in the outer barrier of the campus because of the structure that has been already primarily set. Plus, in a way to eliminate any danger of those traveling to class being struck by a vehicle on the way.

Traditional college campuses that have been around for nearly over centuries were created in rural territories to keep students in separating them from the "outside world" while living amongst it. Recently, newer college campuses are built in either urban or suburban areas to expose the student to the world around them. For example, when I previously went to Valdosta State, the school campus is all in one area and the city of Valdosta surrounds it making the campus the center of the city. Transferring to Georgia State, the campus is so expanded that it takes 15 minutes for me to walk from my dorm to the classroom buildings whereas it was a quick 5 minute walk from my dorm that was across campus from the classroom buildings back in Valdosta.

This I don't believe to be true. Mainly because the advancement of technology has made it quicker and easier for the student to be able to obtain information especially because "back in the day" it was difficult to get so much information all at once because the researching process was brutal. Being able to "google" a research thesis for a certain type of project gives the student immediate access to what they need and are looking for. It cuts the research process down nearly 5x.

This is true, and I'm not just saying as a college student myself although the personal connection is intact. Even though adults with families and labor jobs are more likely to go through the same thing, I believe personally it is true for college students because of the pressure of having to attain a degree to get a "good-working" job, and then financial struggles of being a college student due to loans if taken and the cost of supplies for certain classes and courses.

This is implying that the structure of a college campus must be almost closed in to be a "proper" learning environment for its students.

These changes include how the environment and structure of such colleges and universities have changed.

These street structures were built to prevent and trick non-residents and travelers to believing that nothing is there for them to trespass upon or seek.

That conversation right there explicitly presents that because of racial stereotyping and profiling prevents certain groups that "they did not want to attract" from getting to the mall. It's unfair and doesn't make sense to have a bus stop right on the other side of the highway and not thinking about who rides the bus that works at the mall. If they're allowing charter buses inside the mall then why couldn't they do the for such public transportation transits? I hope with such an incident as a minor losing their life having to walk a dangerous route to get to their work place opened their eyes and made them aware of their decisions and the impacts it makes on certain people and seek to change it for the better because it shouldn't have to take a life lost for accessibilities to be made.

The limiting of routes to reach such areas are leaving potentials unemployed.

This states that because of one's racial background and class, a certain group overlooks them as undesirable because they do not want them or others like them in their territory.

While some traffic barriers have been made for the benefit of helping innocents, they also been regulated to prevent any harm or wrongdoings reaching innocents from such violence and crime from thugs and gangs.

These racist views on putting up walls and fences on a particular property to isolate and separate another is stereotyping the other group thinking that if they block out crimes and violence by having a barrier that it won't get to them. It's also stating that one must great lengths to run errands because the resources they seek to reach aren't exposed or available right outside the door for them. The residents think primarily of themselves claiming it's for safety but fail to be considerate for the other groups seeking for efficiency and equality.

Despite the wall still being there as a way to segregate a community from another, racial groups are still isolating from one another in the city. Also, I have looked up pictures for this and along the sides of the wall, there are painted murals that showcase art and the meaning of the wall in an expressed manner.

His biographer was right. Considering that he acclaimed Jones Beach and was biased preferring a certain class and race group over another, drove him to constructing a landscape that prevented the groups he did not favor accessing them. He basically played a role of racial favoritism because of his prejudices.

Courts and laws tends to not see the details within the big picture as to how and why some landscapes and architecture are created to exclude certain minority groups. Back when there were racially divided seatings among places, they're believing that just because their hasn't been signs around for nearly half a century "regulating" and yet segregating where and what races should sit that certain infrastructures that are mentioned that have been built are not used to separate and isolate certain accepted groups from marginalized others.

This example sets a prominent visual that in order to control and alter people's decisions without them knowing it, they make whatever they believe is a better choice more visual and reachable to them rather than make what they believe is not good nearly unaccessible.

I recall reading an article years before that a certain city or country (I do not remember if it was stated in the US, I believe it was Canada but I could be wrong) placed spiked-like figures on the seating and the backs on the benches almost resembling a needle bed to prevent homeless people from laying on them. I even remember how a majority of the responses were saying that's cruel or has gone too far and how that's unfair because it's treating them poorly.

This describes that the government and the system makes changes and creates regulations that benefit certain groups while limiting and restricting it for others.

The "wealthy, most white residents" opposed to this because they're stereotyping minorities believing if public transportation systems were to be installed into their neighborhoods that it would lead to unwanted crime and violence when that's not the case. Most minorities are trying to get to their work places because they do not have their own means of transportation and rely on the public transits.

This shows that a person in authority is limiting the transportation system needed for people to reach certain destinations.

Public transportation to some places became limited due to architecture because of discrimination. They were used to isolate minority groups from such "wealthy" and white neighborhoods.